Box volume on WinISD/BCAE seems way too small

Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
I have been looking at putting two different drivers in my car that both have a unique "problem" in that WinISD and BCAE box calculators seem to recommend extremely small volumes (at a Qtc of .7)

The first driver is a SoundSplinter RL-p12 D4; the sealed volume I get is 0.300cuft...while Mike recommends 1.25-1.35cuft.
Qts 0.219
Qes 0.242
Qms 2.266
Fs 18.856 Hz
Res 6.26 Ohms
Ls 7.382 m
Lp 9.456 m
Rp 14.68 Ohms
Dia 250 m
(% shift) 33.20%
Vas 142.7 L
Mms 168.8 g
Cms 421.9 u
Bl 22.74
n0 380.1 m
Xmag 26.0 mm
Xsus 24.2 mm
Xmax 24.2 mm
SPL/Sensitivity 87.79 dB
Added mass 212 g
The other driver is a Dayton RS180; the sealed volume I get is 0.013cuft.--I have seen various recommended volumes for an enclosure for this mid and none are anywhere near 0.013cuft.

Specifications: *Power handling: 60 watts RMS/90 watts max *VCdia: 1.5" *Le: .90 mH *Znom: 8 ohms *Re: 6.4 ohms *Frequency range: 40-2,200 Hz *Fs: 38 Hz *SPL: 87.6 dB 2.83V/1m *Vas: .88 cu. ft. *Qms: 2.00 *Qes: .47 *Qts: .38 *Xmax: 6 mm *Dimensions: A: 7-1/8", B: 5-3/4", C: 3-5/8"


Can someone please explain to me what is going on?
 
you put the numbers in wrong

you had WINisd set to liters when you put in the RS numbers, that is why you got such a small box. I tried the same thing and got the numbers you got. PE has their VAS in cuft, not liters. I would go with a .3cuft box (Q=.75) for the RS driver so you get a flatter response to 80Hz and a steeper acoustic rolloff. You are using the RS's as mids, so they don't need the lower extension.
The small Qts of the 12 will net you a small box, this is how it goes. Although I get a box size of .55 cuft with an F3 of 60Hz out of WINisd.
 
Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.