Go Back   Home > Forums > General Interest > Car Audio
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 27th November 2009, 07:39 PM   #51
diyAudio Member
 
BP1Fanatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Quote:
Originally Posted by scampo77 View Post
thanks BP1 for all this info but they both seem like sales pitches for these speakers. from what info i have gathered it seems that these wont work well in a sealed box and i think i should stick to a ported box.

the spec that makes the most amount of sense is....
6.0 ft3 (170L) + port displacement
3.5 x 16.25” (8.9x41cm) port, 13.75” (35cm) long
Power Handling = 750W RMS
box size determines max power i can use? is that right? the reason i ask is because i bought these speakers blown up and i have put new coils in them. when i reassembled the speaker i just machined pieces of steel that hold the surround and the spider in place. so if i blow the coils again i can easily pop new ones in. so want to drive these speakers as hard as i can because i really dont have much to lose. i have 1200 watt for each speaker and i have 4 of these amps. so why not drive them with as much power as possible? (this is a serious question)

my question is, if my options are between

3.25 ft3 (92L) + port displacement
3 x 13.25” (7.6x34cm) port, 14.5” (37cm) long
Power Handling = 600W RMS

OR ...

6.0 ft3 (170L) + port displacement
3.5 x 16.25” (8.9x41cm) port, 13.75” (35cm) long
Power Handling = 750W RMS

then what will be my trade off? because this is my exact question which i started with. because i have space and power to drive 4 of the first box or 2 of the second box.

i gotta say, glowbug you have really raised one of my eyebrows at that link you sent of those 4 speakers. i will definatly be considering them for the next upgrade. for now however i need to stick with the equipment that i have on hand and try to make something work.
No problem! The "6.0 ft3 (170L) + port displacement 3.5 x 16.25” (8.9x41cm) port, 13.75” (35cm) long Power Handling = 750W RMS" is for the 15! That's why I put the 12" specs in bold and underlined them.
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th November 2009, 08:41 PM   #52
diyAudio Member
 
event horizon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: East Midlands, England
Quote:
Originally Posted by BP1Fanatic View Post
That's why I put the 12" specs in bold and underlined them.
I'm sorry but having seen this i really must ask

What are the driver specifications?

For a good while i have been looking about at lots of car subwoofers simply because the boys want high SPL. Most manufacturers don't list such things as QTS,QMS,QES etc etc but they might state some ridiculous Xmax.

Having purchased an un-named driver & received a nice spec sheet with the thing i doubt it'll come as much of a surprise that the measured QTS of the driver (admittedly not broken in) was 0.89 when the quoted QTS was under 0.39.

Yes it may well alter given a week of a decent amount of power as FS with adjustments as the resonance drops, but what i'm getting at is where are the "REAL" driver specifications other than someone saying "it'll work well in box size X"?

Work well for who? For you?

If i'm designing for a flat response & high excursion in a "hifi" system i need more than "it'll work ok in this box be it sealed or ported"....

Specs please

E2A:- Someone mentioned RE Audio drivers, if there specifications are accurate then even the cheap RE 8/10/12 D4 speakers are seriously good value for money Why can't other car sub manufacturers quote specs?
__________________
"Never let your morals prevent you from doing what is right!" Salvor Hardin

Last edited by event horizon; 27th November 2009 at 08:50 PM. Reason: added info
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th November 2009, 09:05 PM   #53
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Montreal
Send a message via Yahoo to scampo77
that seems very valid considering that i have changed the coils in these speakers. can anyone link me to a webpage instructing me how to measure these things? if i learn how to do it on one speaker is it the same for all speakers (even midrange)?
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th November 2009, 09:18 PM   #54
diyAudio Member
 
event horizon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: East Midlands, England
Quote:
Originally Posted by scampo77 View Post
that seems very valid considering that i have changed the coils in these speakers. can anyone link me to a webpage instructing me how to measure these things? if i learn how to do it on one speaker is it the same for all speakers (even midrange)?
I'm asuming you mean how to measure driver specs?

If you weren't addressing me i apologise

Look for a book by radio shack, can't remember the name but it is to do with designing & building loudspeakers. Red cover from what i can remember with a kind of cartoon pic of a speaker assembly on the front

It'll instruct you on how to measure just about every driver parameter you need to know, frequency doesn't really matter - same theory & practise applies to midrange drivers & tweeters.

All you'll need is a function generator, a precision resistor & a voltmeter. With those you can measure damn near every driver parameter. If i can find this book (which is in bits i might add) i'll let you know the proper title
__________________
"Never let your morals prevent you from doing what is right!" Salvor Hardin
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th November 2009, 12:17 AM   #55
diyAudio Member
 
tsmith1315's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Doerun, GA
Quote:
Originally Posted by event horizon View Post

Look for a book by radio shack, can't remember the name but it is to do with designing & building loudspeakers. Red cover from what i can remember with a kind of cartoon pic of a speaker assembly on the front
Or The Loudspeaker Design Cookbook by Vance Dickason, or for the quick route buy the woofer tester ($99?) from partsexpress.com
Attached Images
File Type: jpg scan0003.jpg (227.5 KB, 25 views)
__________________
Tim
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th November 2009, 01:09 AM   #56
diyAudio Member
 
BP1Fanatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Quote:
Originally Posted by event horizon View Post
I'm sorry but having seen this i really must ask

What are the driver specifications?

For a good while i have been looking about at lots of car subwoofers simply because the boys want high SPL. Most manufacturers don't list such things as QTS,QMS,QES etc etc but they might state some ridiculous Xmax.

Having purchased an un-named driver & received a nice spec sheet with the thing i doubt it'll come as much of a surprise that the measured QTS of the driver (admittedly not broken in) was 0.89 when the quoted QTS was under 0.39.

Yes it may well alter given a week of a decent amount of power as FS with adjustments as the resonance drops, but what i'm getting at is where are the "REAL" driver specifications other than someone saying "it'll work well in box size X"?

Work well for who? For you?

If i'm designing for a flat response & high excursion in a "hifi" system i need more than "it'll work ok in this box be it sealed or ported"....

Specs please

E2A:- Someone mentioned RE Audio drivers, if there specifications are accurate then even the cheap RE 8/10/12 D4 speakers are seriously good value for money Why can't other car sub manufacturers quote specs?
http://kicker.com/sites/default/files/L7_0.pdf

Model: 08S12L72 Averaged 08S12L74 Averaged
Norm Imp 4.00 8.00
SPL 87.27 87.47
Lem 3.825 5.420
Reve 3.86 6.77
Sd 0.0645 0.0645
BL 20.06 25.44
Vas 45.55 45.46
Mms 264.98 247.53
Fs 34.93 31.55
Qms 6.258 5.744
Qes 0.504 0.586
Qts 0.511 0.532

Model: 08S15L72 Averaged 08S15L74 Averaged
Norm Imp 4.00 8.00
SPL 89.28 89.43
Lem 4.085 6.284
Reve 3.69 7.10
Sd 0.1056 0.1056
BL 21.10 27.90
Vas 156.56 165.66
Mms 374.43 351.15
Fs 26.2 26.28
Qms 7.489 6.579
Qes 0.511 0.529
Qts 0.478 0.490

Model: 06S15L72 06S12L72 06S10L72 06S8L72
Nominal Impedance(Ohms): D2 D2 D2 D2
SPL dB 1W/1M: 89 88.6 86.1 83.4
Displacement, cc: 4530 2475 1830 980
Displacement, cu.in.: 276.5 151 111.8 59.8
Hole cutout, in dia: 14 1/16 11 3/16 9 1/2 7 5/8
Mounting Depth, in: 8 1/2 6 11/16 6 3/16 4 11/16
Revc: 3.56 3.73 3.645 3.305
VC Inductance, mH: 3.98 3.81 3.089 2.77
Sd, m3: 0.1056 0.0645 0.0439 0.0273
BL: 21.395 17.93 17.16 14.29
Vas, Liters: 179.3 65.55 34.3 10.075
Vas, CuFt: 6.33 2.31 1.21 0.36
Moving Mass , oz.: 12.73 6.97 6.13 4.83
Fs: 24.2 33.1 33.1 44.1
Qms: 6.8965 6.191 6.239 7.064
Qes: 0.4515 0.503 0.4745 0.614
Qts: 0.424 0.465 0.441 0.5645
Peak Power Handling, watts: 2000 1500 1200 900
EXmax, mm: 16.1 14.1 13.9 12.2
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th November 2009, 01:16 AM   #57
Glowbug is offline Glowbug  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Glowbug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hillsborough, NC/McLean, VA
Quote:
Why can't other car sub manufacturers quote specs?
The good ones do
__________________
Jim J.
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th November 2009, 01:24 AM   #58
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glowbug View Post
The good ones do
Quoting specs is one thing.

Quoting accurate specs is another.

Time for sub manufacturers to supply "birth specs" with their subs... :-)
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th November 2009, 03:36 AM   #59
diyAudio Member
 
BP1Fanatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Steele View Post
Quoting specs is one thing.

Quoting accurate specs is another.

Time for sub manufacturers to supply "birth specs" with their subs... :-)
I agree
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th November 2009, 05:37 PM   #60
diyAudio Member
 
event horizon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: East Midlands, England
Quote:
Originally Posted by tsmith1315 View Post
Or The Loudspeaker Design Cookbook by Vance Dickason
That's the one It looks in vastly better condition than my copy!
Quote:
Originally Posted by BP1Fanatic View Post
A lot of the time i can't find any, in fact that may well be the first time i have seen specs for Kicker drivers
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glowbug View Post
The good ones do
Yes, i tend to agree - they also tend to be pretty accurate or at least in the ball park.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Steele View Post
Quoting specs is one thing.

Quoting accurate specs is another.

Time for sub manufacturers to supply "birth specs" with their subs... :-)
& there i rest my case!

Ok, it doesn't matter too much in my case as i'll be using these drivers i have in a sealed enclosure. The resulting peak can be taken care of with some simple electronics like a Linkwitz-Riley network.

If i'd have wanted them to work in a reflex going on the so called manufacturers specs it'd be a nightmare
__________________
"Never let your morals prevent you from doing what is right!" Salvor Hardin
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ported vs TL vs sealed Jimmy154 Multi-Way 93 2nd January 2012 01:18 PM
sealed vs. ported sonu Multi-Way 25 9th May 2005 12:50 PM
Sealed or ported? mazeroth Subwoofers 13 23rd November 2004 12:44 PM
ΏSealed or Ported? eXn Car Audio 28 11th October 2004 11:05 PM
Ported vs sealed 2 ways plasmodium Multi-Way 3 18th November 2002 08:22 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:03 PM.

Page generated in 0.14212 seconds (84.59% PHP - 15.41% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio