|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
|
I have 1" silk domes with 1st order crossovers. They play down to 1750. I like their sound and the simplicity of the crossovers.
When I turn them up, it sounds like they get thick and loud around the tweeters resonance. My mids and lows are fine at these levels so I think I want to either reduce the low content going to the tweeters or protect their resonance but I don't want to upset the crossover too much. The options I've come up with are: 1. Put a resistor in parallel with the tweeter and adjust the capacitors accordingly. 2. impedance notch filter. 3. A large (out of band) inductor to turn the crossover 2nd order at some low frequency. 4. some combination of the above. 5. A full 2nd order conversion. I think I only really want another 6-10dB. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
|
Have you tried running them higher? I've run ceramic resistors on drivers a lot of times to cut them back if running multiple drivers & one amp. I ran soft domes a lot too, 1", and didn't like them that low so I ran a smaller cap except I forget the value now. Also experiment with one or both out of phase, but if they are screaming/raspy you are either into resonance or too low for that power level. You might be able to run a larger mid dome, some can get fairly high and with some EQ be used as a tweeter...if you like that sound with them running lower. I'm sure you can cut the lows down some with the right xover as well. Another benefit of running them higher and having the midrange get in there is the domes can blow up easily running low.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
Quote:
But cheaper ones often have highish ressonance Which makes low crossover point a problem May work fine at low SPL, but not at higher SPL Well, ofcourse there could be some other reasons I have removed LCR curcuit on my woofers and mid, with some succes Though it took a lot of work on xo afterwards But on my tweeters the ressonance "killer" had to stay Couldnt make it work without And Im not even crossing it low But Im curious, how do you know it plays down to 1750hz Last edited by tinitus; 6th October 2009 at 10:20 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Did it Himself
diyAudio Member
|
#1 won't do anything but load your amp more. I would go with #3 or #5.
__________________
www.readresearch.co.uk my website for UK diy audio people - designs, PCBs, kits and more |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Doerun, GA
|
Quote:
6-10dB additional output is a very significant increase when you're already having problems. A 2nd or 3rd order crossover would be no more complex than a first order with a notch filter, and would be my only bet to achieve the gains you're looking for without raising the crossover frequency.
__________________
Tim |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
|
With 3 x 1u5 capacitors per side, it looks like the impedance peak is having an effect. I confirmed the response by measuring it.
I'd like to try an out of band inductor across the tweeter. All I have on hand that's matched is a pair of 0m82's. These give about a 2.6kHz rolloff with a Q below 0.3 which may not be helpful but.... If the impedance peak is happening there, what affect will it have on this option? |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Did it Himself
diyAudio Member
|
Really with passive you need to work above resonance, i.e. cross at 2x or 3x resonance frequency. Else the impedance peak just screws everything up. As you are also trying to get significantly more output from the tweeter, 1st order is just no longer an option.
__________________
www.readresearch.co.uk my website for UK diy audio people - designs, PCBs, kits and more |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
|
OK then. At least I can play with the level and reverse the phase if I have to. On the other hand I could look for a more versatile set of tweeters. I don't see many car tweeters sold separately...are there many out there?
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Did it Himself
diyAudio Member
|
You are going to struggle to find any tweeter that will take a 1.7kHz cross at 1st order. You will have to move to looking at drivers like the Jordan HD.
__________________
www.readresearch.co.uk my website for UK diy audio people - designs, PCBs, kits and more |
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| power handling | lsutherlin | Multi-Way | 1 | 19th October 2007 10:57 PM |
| Tweeter power handling ? | youyoung21147 | Multi-Way | 29 | 4th May 2007 12:53 AM |
| Power output vs speaker power handling | Bob0513 | Chip Amps | 4 | 5th November 2006 10:41 AM |
| TL Power handling | fortyquid | Multi-Way | 9 | 13th October 2003 12:18 AM |
| Power Handling | Myren | Multi-Way | 1 | 30th October 2001 07:18 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10592 seconds (77.67% PHP - 22.33% MySQL) with 10 queries |