|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
|
I plan on installing a sub with 3 ohms( JL 13TW5). I don't want to spend top dollar for a new or used jl 500/1. Can anyone reccomend other brands or models that would fill the bill ? I plan on shopping on Craigslist and ebay for a used amp - prefersably under $200.
Thanks |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
|
LOL, I got into amps more to answer that kind of question, but now it is even harder to answer! Do you have other brands you like, and what power level do you need? What is regulated? You mean the new amps that run any ohm load? Any amp that can handle 2 ohms like most any class D should work fine at 3 with a little less output.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
|
Hi and thanks.
I believe the JL sub I bought requires 500 watts RMS at 3 ohms. ( although I've read that it actually runs closer to 4 ohms) I will be using it in a Mini Cooper and so don't think I'll need to crank it to loud.... I have no brand loyalty - except to JL subs. I've heard that sub amps can have a up to 10 % distortion and not be audible. I don't know if its true, but suggest that I don't need to spring for a top quality JL amp. I have read that the audiobahn amps are not to reliable, but other than that, I' open to sugestions. I have seen a few class D Kenwood mono amps that claim 500 RMS at 2 ohms, I'm leaning towards that. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
|
I don't think sub distortion is that much of an issue, most any amp I've seen is <1% at rated rms output except real cheap amps with bogus ratings that just make less power. And on subs it is not as noticeable if it does distort, yet power is so cheap just get a larger amp if you need to. I would go class d. If you get a real cheap amp certainly plan on one rated larger than you need, and great amps may be underrated or able to run lower loads.
I like Kenwoods for their price range, the 910x/915x class d are bargains IMO. They seem to work great and are IIRC 850/950rms at 2 ohms, though I've never power tested one. I've sold them for 100 used, great deal for near 1kw amp. Have not seen the smaller class d but most kenwoods are similar inside. Most Kenwoods seem to work well they just are not the most durable, yet some others break more often. I would call them one of the cheapest decent amps to use but just my .02. Hard to complain for the price. Some say the excelons are really nice. The newer ICE amps like the Pioneer PRS are interesting, they can run full range and are a type of class D. I don't know much about them. Just would give you more options in the future to have one of those. I have almost always run cheaper amps on subs and never had an issue other than lack of power, I can't say the same for highs though. I wish more people here that know a lot about amps would comment on quality of certain brands (hint, hint), but it is very difficult to do. Old amps we know from many years of experience how good they are. Then again it seems that in a price range, some manufacturers must be doing something right. Take some old names like Kenwood, Pioneer, Alpine, RF, MTX, and they have been around a long time with relatively little change. SoundStream for example is a much different product today than the old ones were. Certainly the issue today is poor reliability with cheap amps. Have seen some of the Audiobahn class AB and they are a cheaper amp that worked ok, though plenty were blown up. Same with power acoustik, spl, insignia, pyramid, blitz, sony, etc. I'd say the kenwood is better built than those are IMO. One factor is who runs the amps, hard to say if a brand is abused more. I mean minivans are rated the safest cars on the road but its more because of who drives them. I have a newer kicker I don't like, but some people think they are great and others don't. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
|
Thanks for the really usefull info
last thing.... I forgot to ask... is it a gimick or really usefull to have a separate dial / control to be able to adjust the sub volume ? I know it can be adjusted through my head unit, but pushing itty bitty buttons while driving is a lot tougher than just turning a dial up and down. I think I just answered my own question! |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
|
You just did is right. I can get to it sort of easy with my HU if I leave the settings menu at sub level, but still a pain. The issue I have is source material from radio to songs is all different, I have to mess with it all the time. If my next amp has one it will go on there or I'll use a processor with one. My current amp does have one but I didn't put it in at the time as I had a crossover in front with a gain. For as long as I remember I have used a crossover with high and low gains, in front.
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
|
For some stupid reason, I had the 500 RMS in my head as a minimum requirerment. While the JL 13TW5 is sort of ineffient, if I push it to 500 RMS, my poor little mini cooper would probably shake apart.
I'll definitely check out some smaller amps as well. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
|
I tested the alpine mrp-m450 (400rms@2ohm) and it seemed to work well but did not use in a car. I think they went to a M500 for the new model. The 450 could be had used pretty reasonable last time I looked, but just a suggestion. Wish I would have kept the one I had but I like alpines too. The M650 is longer.
Last setup I had as a single 12 box I tried a few subs in it running on an old soundstream rubicon 300w. It was in trunk of smaller sedan and it was plenty loud for sure, just didn't have the bottom for me so I went with an IB setup with four 12s....that actually can make too much output. My highs are too weak to keep up with it now, but if they could they would go too loud as the subs really thunder on only 420rms rated class D and could take more power. So I plan to beef the highs and slim down the subs. |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Regulated or non-regulated SMPS | longitude | Class D | 5 | 8th May 2007 03:02 PM |
| Need a little help with my first regulated PSU | jarros | Power Supplies | 16 | 2nd May 2005 11:28 PM |
| Regulated PS Kit | cantskienuf | Chip Amps | 7 | 24th September 2004 03:20 AM |
| Regulated PSU Help.. | jleaman | Analogue Source | 9 | 26th July 2004 12:36 PM |
| Regulated or no regulated PSU? | Higo | Chip Amps | 2 | 16th July 2003 04:38 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |