|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Wilmington, NC
|
I've got a couple of Kicker ZR1000 amps with blown supply FETs. They are HUF75343G. I can get them, but they not from my preferred vendors except in a TO220 package, and these are in TO247s.
I can however get HUF75344G FETs which are very similar, but with slightly lower RDSon (8mohm vs 9mohm) and higher Ciss (3200pF vs 3000pF) and slightly higher Qg (210nC vs 205nC). They look like they will work Ok, and run cooler, except I could see that input capacitance being an issue... Anyone tried them or have opinions? Thanks! |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Heidelberg
|
What´s the value from the gate resistors ?
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Wilmington, NC
|
470ohm
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Louisiana
|
The gate resistors are 47 ohms. I'd use an IRFP064 if the originals are not available.
__________________
Links >> Basic Car Audio Amp Repair --- Basic Car Audio Electronics --- Basic Transistor Testing --- Basic Switching Power Supply Design --- Basic Computer Skills << Links |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Wilmington, NC
|
DOH! Stupid mistake on the resistance
![]() Why the IRFP064? They have similar characteristics, but are MUCH more expensive than the HUF75344G parts. The only real difference I see -offhand- is that the IRFP064 has a higher continuous current rating if you go with the IRFP064NPBF. If I used the IRFP064VPBF it's even better at 130A and a 5.5mohm RDSon, but it has a real high Ciss and Qg... Thanks! |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I think that HUF75344 is a new improved device that replaces HUF75343, but the difference is minimal so don't fear using the newer one. I know because when I ran out of HUF75343 and I went to buy more, I only found HUF75344 too.
On the other hand, IRFP064 is an ancient device with ancient performance and it's overpriced for quite obvious reasons. IR has developed much better automotive MOSFET since then, my two preferred ones are IRFZ48V and IRF2907Z.
__________________
I use to feel like the small child in The Emperor's New Clothes tale |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Wilmington, NC
|
Ok, thanks; that's what I thought may be the case. I guess I'll stick to the HUF75344G3 as they are only $1.816 at quantities of 10 and are available in the TO247 package I need...
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Louisiana
|
Even though the 064 has been around for quite a while, I've found nothing better (more rugged) for use in the power supply.
In the power supply of the Kicker ZR1000, there will be no difference in performance of the 75344 or the 064. If the 75344 is cheaper, use it.
__________________
Links >> Basic Car Audio Amp Repair --- Basic Car Audio Electronics --- Basic Transistor Testing --- Basic Switching Power Supply Design --- Basic Computer Skills << Links |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Wilmington, NC
|
Thanks Perry! I'm ordering them now.
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Replacement for CDM 12.1 | Sandor | Digital Source | 4 | 12th June 2010 08:01 PM |
| AD 846 replacement | Fasen | Digital Line Level | 18 | 16th July 2009 04:33 PM |
| MTX 5 ch pot replacement | pk386 | Parts | 2 | 1st October 2006 04:32 AM |
| looking for a replacement for pcb cad | bigpanda | Solid State | 1 | 18th September 2004 07:24 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09392 seconds (76.19% PHP - 23.81% MySQL) with 10 queries |