diyAudio - RJM Audio Projects
Go Back   Home > Forums > Blogs > rjm

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
RJM Audio Projects Information and announcements regarding my audio projects.
Old

X-reg voltage stabilizer LTSPICE file

Posted 15th March 2013 at 01:54 AM by rjm
Updated 20th March 2013 at 01:47 AM by rjm

I did up the X-reg circuit in LTSpice.

Results shown below, together with the LTSpice .asc file you can use to play around with this yourself.

First attached image shows FFT for the rectified DC (green), reference voltage (red) and X-reg output (blue) for the designed-for 10 mA output (top) and a more punishing 100 mA (bottom).

Second image shows an LTSpice screengrab for the LT1086 with bypassed adj pin under comparable loading. Input voltage in blue, output in green. This is a reasonable approximation of a "good" IC regulator.

Last image shows a plot of the exported LTSpice FFT data for the X-reg and the LT1086-12V (Cin 1000uF, Cout 100uF) both at nominal currents of 10 mA. The LT1086-12V is a reasonable substitute for a generic LM7812, i.e. a "bad" IC regulator.

A typical op amp will have sufficient PSRR to mop of the residual noise from the bypassed LT1086. The fixed LT1086-12V, on the...
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	xreg 01.png
Views:	2627
Size:	104.8 KB
ID:	910   Click image for larger version

Name:	LT1086.png
Views:	1005
Size:	56.0 KB
ID:	912   Click image for larger version

Name:	Regulator Comparison.png
Views:	577
Size:	50.4 KB
ID:	914  
Attached Files
File Type: zip xreg 01.zip (1.9 KB, 162 views)
rjm's Avatar
rjm
diyAudio Member
Views 2271 Comments 2 rjm is offline
Old

Phonoclone boards, soldering, and Q1, Q2.

Posted 7th February 2013 at 05:34 AM by rjm

This is in response to several recent emails I've received, where people were having problems with, typically, one board having a bad V+ or V- regulated voltage output.

The number of cases relative to the number of boards shipped caused me to worry that a manufacturing error might have occurred, so at my request I had a customer return the phonoclone boards he had built to me for inspection.

I'm happy to report that the problem was traced to poor soldering technique, the boards themselves are fine. What had happened was solder had cooled before the component had fully settled, and pushing the component down to the board surface then tore the trace away from the bottom of the board, breaking the circuit.

Subsequently, thinking the transistors blown, he replaced them, doing a fair bit of damage to the pads of Q1, Q2.

Fortunately, I was able to fairly quickly set everything to rights, and the boards are now on their way back to him....
rjm's Avatar
rjm
diyAudio Member
Views 603 Comments 2 rjm is offline
Old

B-board Boxer Project : A Low Voltage Headphone Amplifier for 16 ohm Loads

Posted 7th July 2012 at 12:19 AM by rjm
Updated 29th September 2012 at 02:58 AM by rjm

I always seem to end up optimizing my headphone amplifier circuits for higher impedance headphones, this mostly happens because I own a pair of 300 ohm HD-600s and it is tedious to design for both the voltage requirements of high impedance headphones and the current requirements of low impedance headphones.

Not impossible, just, for the class-A designs I seem to be building recently, increasingly large, heavy, and impractical.

Complimentary transistor circuits, however, offer the opportunity to swap voltage for current at something close to the same design cost. They are therefore a practical topology for efficient class-A power delivery into low impedance headphones. As a design experiment, my aim is to discover how far I can leverage an ultra-low-voltage, unity gain circuit for compactness without sacrificing sound quality.

Ok. Back-of-the-envelope calculations:

A typical 16 ohm in-ear-headphone has a sensitivity of 100-105...
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	B-board Boxer AA.png
Views:	2516
Size:	26.6 KB
ID:	730   Click image for larger version

Name:	B-board Boxer AA LTSPICE.png
Views:	1613
Size:	124.7 KB
ID:	732   Click image for larger version

Name:	B-board Boxer AA 0.5 sch.png
Views:	863
Size:	19.6 KB
ID:	735   Click image for larger version

Name:	B-board Boxer AA 0.5 brd.png
Views:	724
Size:	21.7 KB
ID:	736   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0083 800.jpg
Views:	285
Size:	134.3 KB
ID:	747  

Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0086 800.jpg
Views:	409
Size:	185.2 KB
ID:	748   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0075 800.jpg
Views:	235
Size:	155.1 KB
ID:	749   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0079 800.jpg
Views:	398
Size:	206.1 KB
ID:	750   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0114 800.jpg
Views:	351
Size:	207.7 KB
ID:	751   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0106 800.jpg
Views:	633
Size:	196.0 KB
ID:	752  

Attached Files
rjm's Avatar
rjm
diyAudio Member
Views 2626 Comments 7 rjm is offline
Old

The Double-Diamond Amplifier (DDA)

Posted 13th June 2012 at 06:09 AM by rjm
Updated 16th June 2012 at 02:57 PM by rjm

This isn't my first attempt. It's been on my mind for a while: how to coax a diamond buffer into giving voltage gain, without resorting to fronting it with a op amp.

After reading a particularly gregarious thread over in the headphone forum, I'm more and more stoked on giving this a real shot.

Despite the (catchy) name I'm thinking pre-amplifier rather than amplifier applications.

update: I have have a quick and dirty sim up and running in ltspice. Curiously, the output distortion is 15 dB lower when the buffer runs open loop than when it is included inside the feedback loop. Intrigued. Currently under investigation.

update: refined the sim slightly, achieved -85 dB distortion levels at 0 dB / 1 kHz / 600 ohms running the output buffer open loop. Bandwidth is just under 1 MHz, adjusted by changing the feedback resistance. As before, performance sims out notably worse with the buffer
inside the feedback loop.
...
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	DDA mission patch.png
Views:	324
Size:	54.5 KB
ID:	704   Click image for larger version

Name:	DDA 0.6 FFT.png
Views:	1919
Size:	115.5 KB
ID:	709  
Attached Files
File Type: zip current feedback prototype 6 LTSPICE file.zip (1.4 KB, 173 views)
rjm's Avatar
rjm
diyAudio Member
Views 1828 Comments 2 rjm is offline
Old

Bypassing, Goldilocks, and the Sound of Nothing

Posted 31st May 2012 at 06:28 PM by rjm
Updated 1st June 2012 at 11:53 PM by rjm

Douglas Self writes,
Quote:
The 5532 and 5534 type op-amps require adequate supply decoupling if they are to remain stable, otherwise they appear to be subject to some sort of internal oscillation that degrades linearity without being visible on a normal oscilloscope. The essential requirement is that the positive and negative rails should be decoupled with a 100 nF capacitor between them, at a distance of not more than a few millimeters from the op-amp; normally one such capacitor is fitted per package as close to it as possible.
He's someone who should know. Anyway, it doesn't take much digging on the internet to confirm beyond reasonable doubt that bypass caps should be as close to the op amp power pins as possible. So thinking about my previous experiments with bypassing the Sapphire, by adding bypass caps around the transistors I also effectively also added a bypass for the op amp, but a rather poor one as the power-pin-to-power-pin round trip loop distance is probably 10...
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1366 1280 hack.jpg
Views:	713
Size:	313.9 KB
ID:	696   Click image for larger version

Name:	pcb-sapphire-14s1-brd-bypass.png
Views:	1644
Size:	40.6 KB
ID:	697  
Attached Files
rjm's Avatar
rjm
diyAudio Member
Views 1962 Comments 0 rjm is offline
Old

Ceramic capacitors : who knew?

Posted 12th May 2012 at 01:15 AM by rjm
Updated 28th May 2012 at 11:51 PM by rjm

This I have been experimenting - call it a hunch - on the effects of bypassing electrolytic capcitors (Nichicon FW and KW) with 0.1 uF TDK ceramics (Mouser 810-FK28X7S2A104K) with the diamond buffer circuit used in both my B-board preamp and Sapphire headphone amplifier.

This being a mod, I had to solder the caps to the underside of the boards, attached to the leads of the Nichicon 100uF electrolyic capacitors.

I used four ceramics per channel, one per active device in the diamond buffer if you like.

I did several other changes on the B-board at the same time, so it wasn't obvious until I modded the Sapphire in the same way what was the result of the bypassing. Anyway, with both the improvement was immediate and dramatic: any sense of "transistor-like" treble glare is completely quenched. The whole top end takes a step backwards, not in extension, but in prominence.

Less audiophile detail, more swinging mojo.

Update...
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	810-FK28X7S2A104K.jpg
Views:	974
Size:	13.2 KB
ID:	682   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1368 1280.jpg
Views:	667
Size:	361.7 KB
ID:	683   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1366 1280.jpg
Views:	494
Size:	288.6 KB
ID:	684   Click image for larger version

Name:	b-board bypass.png
Views:	634
Size:	24.7 KB
ID:	691   Click image for larger version

Name:	b-board GZ 10e board bypass.png
Views:	673
Size:	26.0 KB
ID:	692  

Click image for larger version

Name:	pcb-sapphire-14s1-brd-bypass.png
Views:	1257
Size:	37.8 KB
ID:	694  
Attached Files
rjm's Avatar
rjm
diyAudio Member
Views 2343 Comments 1 rjm is offline
Old

RJM B-board vs. 47 Labs 0247

Posted 5th May 2012 at 12:29 PM by rjm
Updated 6th May 2012 at 06:16 AM by rjm

B-board vs. 0247.

Comparison of the noise baselines, measured at the circuit output using a NI USB-6215 DAQ. Unloaded for the preamps, and with a 6 ohm load for the 0347 amplifier.
  • B-board: -139 [300Hz-100kHz] 0 dB gain (-139 - 0 = -139 dB, 110 nV sqrtHz input referred). The actual B-board output noise is below this measurement threshold.
  • 0247: -124 dB [300Hz-100kHz] 14 dB gain (-124 - 14 = -139 dB, 110 nV sqrtHz input referred).
  • 0347: -109 dB [300Hz-100kHz] 31 dB gain (-109 - 31 = -140 dB, 100 nV sqrtHz input referred).

See the attached plot for the FFT data. Note the peak at 28 Hz is an artifact of the measurement apparatus.

By way of comparison, a typical audio opamp has an input referred voltage noise figure of 3-8 nV sqrtHz (-170 ~ -160 dB) and can be expected to return this datasheet specification in most well-designed circuits. In other words the output noise is going to be about -160 dB + the circuit gain.

The 0247...
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	compiled FFT.png
Views:	604
Size:	60.7 KB
ID:	675   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_4078 1280.jpg
Views:	1075
Size:	367.6 KB
ID:	676   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0938 1280.jpg
Views:	1644
Size:	375.4 KB
ID:	677  
Attached Files
rjm's Avatar
rjm
diyAudio Member
Views 1452 Comments 0 rjm is offline
Old

Flight of the Pheonix

Posted 26th April 2012 at 08:34 AM by rjm
Updated 4th May 2012 at 02:30 PM by rjm

Nor the remake, the original. Good film. Story shakes out something like "Twelve Angry Men in the desert": Put together a small, random group of people and pressure them to complete a task. In the case of "The Flight of the Pheonix" this is to make an airworthy plane (this one) from the crashed remains of another (this one).

So. We start with my old red Gainclone case, and a pair of these buffer boards , and a Takman resistor, 24 position stepped attenuator from eBay, unassembled, and start working to transform something old into something new.

Here's my LM3875 gainclone. Served me well, but it is time to bid adieu! (at least to the guts):
Click the image to open in full size.

Opened up, we see the circuit board, such that it is, and my home-built 11 position attenuator:
Click the image to open in full size....
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_4007 1280.jpg
Views:	154
Size:	236.8 KB
ID:	651   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_4009 1280.jpg
Views:	336
Size:	301.2 KB
ID:	652   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_4023 1280.jpg
Views:	251
Size:	291.4 KB
ID:	653   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_4073 1280.jpg
Views:	238
Size:	375.5 KB
ID:	663   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_4075 1280.jpg
Views:	118
Size:	309.4 KB
ID:	664  

Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_4078 1280.jpg
Views:	221
Size:	367.6 KB
ID:	665   Click image for larger version

Name:	B-board 10e FFT.png
Views:	212
Size:	35.9 KB
ID:	670  
Attached Files
rjm's Avatar
rjm
diyAudio Member
Views 803 Comments 0 rjm is offline
Old

Stereo VSPS rev 50c

Posted 25th April 2012 at 12:48 AM by rjm

The original stereo VSPS project is now quite mature. I did a couple of minor tweaks on the last re-spin of the layout, removing the pads for the old Black Gate coupling caps (long gone), adding thermal isolation, and making room for a pair of optional ceramic bypass caps next to the op amp.

The new boards are matt black. Quite cool. I have a small stack if you need any.

All the info you need to build one is attached.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_3986 1280.jpg
Views:	412
Size:	235.5 KB
ID:	644   Click image for larger version

Name:	pcb-vsps-50c.png
Views:	692
Size:	13.3 KB
ID:	645   Click image for larger version

Name:	pcb-vsps-50c-brd.png
Views:	976
Size:	10.2 KB
ID:	646   Click image for larger version

Name:	pcb-vsps-50c-sch.png
Views:	839
Size:	24.3 KB
ID:	647  
Attached Files
File Type: zip pcb-vsps50c.zip (83.0 KB, 266 views)
File Type: zip pcb-vsps50c-bom.zip (86.2 KB, 228 views)
rjm's Avatar
rjm
diyAudio Member
Views 1803 Comments 2 rjm is offline
Old

X-reg Evaluation Boards

Posted 7th April 2012 at 12:15 AM by rjm
Updated 9th April 2012 at 03:37 AM by rjm

Once in a while I get emails asking after the X-reg evaluation boards. These are handy little 5x8 cm test boards for the X-reg voltage regulator - or they would be, if I had ever bothered to get a set made.

Since the circuit is built into the VSPS300 and Phonoclone 3, it wasn't really a big priority.

Anyhow, yesterday I re-drew the evaluation boards and I'll be getting a batch made in the near future, along with some of the stereo VSPS that people were also asking after recently. They won't exactly fly off the shelves, but I started to feel bad for those few people who actually wanted them.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	pcb-xreg-15c-brd.png
Views:	743
Size:	10.3 KB
ID:	640   Click image for larger version

Name:	pcb-xreg-15c.png
Views:	801
Size:	11.0 KB
ID:	641   Click image for larger version

Name:	pcb-xreg-15c-sch.png
Views:	756
Size:	22.2 KB
ID:	642  
Attached Files
File Type: zip pcb-xreg.zip (129.5 KB, 252 views)
rjm's Avatar
rjm
diyAudio Member
Views 1253 Comments 0 rjm is offline
Hide this!Advertise here!

New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:26 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2015 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2015 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2