diyAudio - Blog Entries
Go Back   Home > Forums > Blogs
Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Gallery Wiki Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Old

Is neutrality really the same as accuracy?

Posted 11th October 2015 at 07:41 PM by cspirou

One thing I hear from objective audiophiles is that amps should strive to be as neutral as possible because you should only hear what the record producer intended for you to hear.

Philosophically I do agree that I should hear what the artist meant for me to hear. However how do you know that the album was recorded while listening to a similarly neutral amp? Recording to a master tape usually doesn't include the amp powering the monitors so whatever they heard through their amp and speakers isn't captured on the tape. In order to really hear what was in the studio, you would need the same amp and the same set to speakers to listen to what they listened to. So if my home setup has a miracle amp and speaker that truly is ruler flat from 1hz-1MHz and 0.00001% THD, I probably still am hearing things differently then the artist because they probably used an average monitor that has -10db at 30Hz.

So how important is it really that an amp be neutral?
diyAudio Member
Posted in Uncategorized
Views 501 Comments 1 cspirou is offline
Old

House concert/recording session- Chicago-MKE area

Posted 11th October 2015 at 02:15 PM by SY

We will be hosting a house concert and recording session on November 20th, 2015, featuring the remarkable young artist John Statz. 8:30 pm music start, come earlier for food and drink.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gIScZp67gU

Contact me at my two letter handle (SY) at my domain, syclotron.com if you want to attend.
SY's Avatar
SY
diyAudio Moderator
Posted in Uncategorized
Views 801 Comments 2 SY is offline
Old

Weller soldering station PCB files

Posted 11th October 2015 at 12:10 PM by googlyone

I have been asked for the PCB file for the weller WPS80 like soldering station driver.

This is rock solid stable - have been using it for quite a long while now with zero issues.

The files are attached, in ALTIUM format.

Weller 80W.zip

Any questions just ask.
diyAudio Member
Posted in Uncategorized
Views 473 Comments 0 googlyone is offline
Old

Designing the best bang-for-the-buck headphone amp

Posted 10th October 2015 at 01:55 AM by abraxalito
Updated 16th October 2015 at 05:36 AM by abraxalito

Headphone amps aren't any different from speaker amps in principle - what you hear (apart from a bigger version of the input signal) is the power supply's noise coupled through the inadequate PSRR of the electronics.

SE classA operation is a way to minimize the generation of power supply noise by arranging the current flow to be constant to a first order so that any remaining ripple on the supply is the result of the finite output impedance of the follower's loading current source and those of the driving stages. But how significant are these 2nd order effects? This design is an attempt to find out - by reducing them as far as practicable.

The idea is to run SE classA at a much higher voltage than is needed to drive the 'phones (balanced, with 80V supplies giving 144V peak-peak) then step down the output voltage with a custom-wound output transformer. This has the effect of increasing the PSRR of the amp's output stage. I'm not worried overmuch about the PSRR...
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	P1010035.JPG
Views:	195
Size:	588.0 KB
ID:	1741   Click image for larger version

Name:	P1010036.JPG
Views:	162
Size:	705.9 KB
ID:	1742   Click image for larger version

Name:	balSEclassAheadamp.png
Views:	460
Size:	28.5 KB
ID:	1744   Click image for larger version

Name:	PSUnoise100R.jpg
Views:	79
Size:	46.6 KB
ID:	1746   Click image for larger version

Name:	P1010039.JPG
Views:	173
Size:	643.0 KB
ID:	1748  

Click image for larger version

Name:	P1010041.JPG
Views:	313
Size:	686.1 KB
ID:	1749  
abraxalito's Avatar
diyAudio Member
Views 985 Comments 4 abraxalito is offline
Old

ASUS Xonar Essence STX soundcard

Posted 9th October 2015 at 10:46 PM by rjm (RJM Audio Blog)
Updated 7th November 2015 at 09:44 PM by rjm

https://www.asus.com/Essence-Hi-Fi-A...r_Essence_STX/

I admit I did not give ASUS the benefit of the doubt and seriously consider their Essence STX soundcard as a replacement for my Onkyo SE200-PCI. ASUS make nice motherboards, but unlike Onkyo have no previous expertise in high end audio.

I am happy to report - a bit late in the game, the card came out in 2009 - that they've done a really good job with it and the drivers for Windows 10, technically still in beta, work just fine.

*****

Asus updated the design recently to the STX II. The PCB has been redone, but the only visible change is the PCM1792A DAC has been moved towards the top of the card closer to the IV conversion op amps. An second LDO regulator IC, U34, empty on the STX, is now populated. A "TXCO" clock source is added next to the ASUS audio controller IC. The four film caps next to the output IC are replaced with WIMA brand. It's basically identical, so it...
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	controlpanel.jpg
Views:	267
Size:	104.2 KB
ID:	1737   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_8149bs.jpg
Views:	183
Size:	301.9 KB
ID:	1738   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_8136bs.jpg
Views:	544
Size:	318.0 KB
ID:	1739   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_8152bs.jpg
Views:	183
Size:	266.3 KB
ID:	1740   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_8136b.jpg
Views:	401
Size:	467.7 KB
ID:	1750  

Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0780 sm.jpg
Views:	200
Size:	151.5 KB
ID:	1751  
rjm's Avatar
rjm
diyAudio Member
Views 912 Comments 0 rjm is offline
Old

Onkyo SE200-PCI sound card windows 10 driver issues / disable immezio 3D effects

Posted 8th October 2015 at 07:35 AM by rjm (RJM Audio Blog)
Updated 23rd November 2015 at 11:30 PM by rjm

Apologies for the Google-friendly title, I'm hoping people experiencing the same problem will find their way here.

Onkyo download page: http://www.jp.onkyo.com/support/pcau...d/se200pci.htm

Current version is 5.60C, last update was 2012 to be compatible with Windows 8. Driver package 5.60C installs without issues on Windows 10 64 bit. The AudioDeck utility installs as well.

However, all is not well:

On installation, Immezio 3D effects are enabled. This locks the sample rate at 48 kHz. 44, 96, and 192 kHz cannot be selected. Deselecting the Immezio 3D effects prompts a reboot, but the Immezio 3D effects remain enabled after rebooting. The card is stuck at 48 kHz. 3D effects (which enables the DSP processing such as Qsounds, EAX, A3D) cannot be shut off.

I see three possible workarounds:

1. Find a command line switch, or edit the installation batch file to disable Immezio 3D on installation...
Attached Files
File Type: zip RegReboot.zip (159.9 KB, 583 views)
rjm's Avatar
rjm
diyAudio Member
Views 4284 Comments 3 rjm is offline
Old

Orb JADE-1 headphone amplifier and DAC : review

Posted 2nd October 2015 at 05:07 AM by rjm (RJM Audio Blog)
Updated 9th November 2015 at 01:44 AM by rjm

This is a headphone amplifier with digital inputs, not a DAC with a headphone jack. Though technically given equal board space, the headphone amp, with hot-running single-ended class-A output stage, is surely the centerpiece of the design. (The Asahi Kasei DAC, with MUSES01 for the I-V, is no slouch mind you.)

First impressions. It is large, solid, and very nicely made, but - after seeing the inside - rather simple, spartan even. From the DAC output to the headphone jack is just two op amps and two transistors, the op amps being shared between channels. A third op amp most likely just buffers the analog line output. Apart from the headliner MUSES01 op amp none of the parts are especially expensive, though many were clearly carefully chosen for sound quality - the 2SC5196 for example. The TE7022 USB receiver is a disappointment, as is, to be honest, the single set of power rails and the use of dual op amps shared between channels.

On a positive note, the front...
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_7802s.jpg
Views:	958
Size:	299.9 KB
ID:	1731   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_7804s.jpg
Views:	558
Size:	333.1 KB
ID:	1732  
Attached Files
rjm's Avatar
rjm
diyAudio Member
Views 902 Comments 0 rjm is offline
Old

Choosing a USB DAC

Posted 26th September 2015 at 11:49 AM by rjm (RJM Audio Blog)
Updated 9th October 2015 at 04:24 AM by rjm

My Onkyo soundcard drivers stopped working when I upgraded to Windows 10. Onkyo says they have no plans to release a patch, so I'm left with no high quality audio solution for my computer. Since I already have a good headphone amplifier, what I'm mainly looking for is a high quality line level analog output.

One options is another soundcard, the ASUS Xonar STX being the obvious choice. I dunno, it doesn't grab me.
I was thinking with going with an external box this time, connected via USB. As this opens up about a zillion options, I'm going to limit things to,
  1. Respected audio brands with a solid reputation for digital audio.
  2. Small enough to be placed on top of my computer case.
  3. $500-ish, used or new.
My short list includes the following: Denon DA-300usb, TEAC UD-301, and Onkyo DA-1000. Teac also makes the 301's big brother, the UD-501. This is a much nicer unit, very substantial. A bit large. Rounding out the field is the LUXMAN DA-100 . These can be found deeply...
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	gb1.jpg
Views:	105
Size:	44.7 KB
ID:	1727   Click image for larger version

Name:	gb3.jpg
Views:	161
Size:	232.3 KB
ID:	1728   Click image for larger version

Name:	K0000429480.jpg
Views:	357
Size:	60.0 KB
ID:	1729   Click image for larger version

Name:	UD-501_m_chassis_l.jpg
Views:	459
Size:	213.4 KB
ID:	1730  
Attached Files
rjm's Avatar
rjm
diyAudio Member
Views 1362 Comments 5 rjm is offline
Old
Rating: 2 votes, 4.50 average.

Discrete transistor based CFB I/V stage

Posted 25th September 2015 at 01:56 PM by abraxalito
Updated 26th September 2015 at 01:35 AM by abraxalito

Since I figured out the reason for needing all those caps in my earlier DAC designs was all brought on by using passive I/V, I'm now a total convert of active I/V in order to do away with the sheer bulk.

Having tried single transistor I/V and loved it, I found there was still some improvement to be gained by biassing the common-base transistor with additional current sources to reduce its input impedance. Since getting down to the region of 1ohm would require some 25mA of bias which isn't well suited to portable applications I decided to have a go at using feedback to obtain the impedance I'm seeking.

I'm not using an off-the-peg CFB amp because they still turn out to be fairly power supply quality susceptible (subjectively speaking) so here's a design I hope that greatly reduces the supply impedance requirements so that it can be used in a portable player.

The picture shows the second prototype I/V stage, coupled to a 6th order Chebyshev anti-imaging...
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	dac_be.jpg
Views:	393
Size:	145.4 KB
ID:	1724   Click image for larger version

Name:	CFBIV.jpg
Views:	703
Size:	66.2 KB
ID:	1725  
Attached Files
abraxalito's Avatar
diyAudio Member
Views 1068 Comments 2 abraxalito is offline
Old

Designing high order active filters

Posted 20th September 2015 at 11:54 PM by abraxalito
Updated 25th September 2015 at 01:20 AM by abraxalito

I've been getting a lot of use out of Simon Bramble's webpage for designing active filters recently - http://www.simonbramble.co.uk/techar...ter_design.htm. Its a great resource.

Right down at the bottom of the page the last filter he shows the schematic of is a 9th order Chebyshev, 1dB ripple, with a corner frequency of 1kHz. A textbook frequency response plot is obtained using LTC6241s. I latched on to this and tried changing the corner frequency to 18kHz, wondering if I could use such a design for an anti-imaging filter for my DACs. So I divided all the capacitor values by 18 and ran the sim. Disaster! The frequency response I obtained is below - a 7dB spike at 17kHz.

The problem seems to be inadequate Q - high order filters are composed of sections which increase in Q (more positive feedback) and the chosen opamps aren't fast enough (18MHz GBW). I went to a faster opamp for the highest Q stage which brought about some improvement...
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	bramble18kchebyshev.jpg
Views:	106
Size:	31.5 KB
ID:	1719   Click image for larger version

Name:	LTC6244-17.4k.jpg
Views:	100
Size:	47.6 KB
ID:	1721   Click image for larger version

Name:	NOSdroop.jpg
Views:	257
Size:	44.3 KB
ID:	1722   Click image for larger version

Name:	NOSdroopFR.jpg
Views:	86
Size:	34.9 KB
ID:	1723  
Attached Files
abraxalito's Avatar
diyAudio Member
Views 750 Comments 7 abraxalito is offline
Hide this!Advertise here!

New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:54 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2016 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2016 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2
Wiki