diyAudio - Blog Entries
Go Back   Home > Forums > Blogs
Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Gallery Wiki Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Old

Audacity sucks.

Posted 9th May 2013 at 02:50 PM by rjm (RJM Audio Blog)
Updated 10th May 2013 at 03:35 AM by rjm

Under windows at least, Audacity is unable to record audio at bitrates above 16 bit.

It will seem to, all right, but the data is quantized at 16 bit (30 microvolt LSB), regardless of the settings chosen.

The attached images show the same source, the first recording is made in Audacity, supposedly 24 bit, but actually only 16 bit, while the second is recorded with a program than actually supports 24 bit, exported, and imported into Audacity. The data is amplified +70dB in both cases to make the difference visible.

Audacity will happily manipulate and save high bit rate data, but as a result of licensing restrictions and on account of it being freeware, it does not support the actual recording of this data.

***

Any internet search will confirm that the Windows version of Audacity is limited to 16 bit recording. And yes, it's more of a limitation of Windows than it is of Audacity. My irritation, however, is chiefly with Audacity...
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	16bitLSB.png
Views:	200
Size:	102.3 KB
ID:	987   Click image for larger version

Name:	24bitLSB.png
Views:	244
Size:	55.0 KB
ID:	988  
rjm's Avatar
rjm
diyAudio Member
Views 854 Comments 0 rjm is offline
Old

Back to passive filters

Posted 8th May 2013 at 02:11 AM by abraxalito

I didn't much care for the sound of my active elliptic filter - great dynamics in the bass for sure but the upper-end colourations were a bit unnatural sounding. So I've shelved tthat one for now and instead I'm playing with a simplified (by which I mean fewer inductors) passive elliptic.

There are two topologies for building elliptics where the zeroes are realized either by shunt series-LC networks or series paralleled-LC networks. The series created zeroes means fewer inductors are called for. In its most basic, unbalanced form there would be just three inductors for a 7th order filter. This filter though is balanced and designed to feed my Nitro desktop amp directly, without any I/V amplifier stage.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	simpler-elliptic.png
Views:	889
Size:	15.3 KB
ID:	986  
abraxalito's Avatar
diyAudio Member
Views 1051 Comments 13 abraxalito is online now
Old

Tube-I-zator Output Cap Upgrade

Posted 3rd May 2013 at 03:23 PM by dvb projekt
Updated 15th May 2013 at 07:56 AM by dvb projekt (Sound review added)

My last dream come true!

The output cap upgrade to the holy grail...

Click the image to open in full size.

DUELUND´s CAST PIO Copper Cap!






Therefore the Tube-I-zator must go to the 2nd floor

Click the image to open in full size.

Click the image to open in full size.


Sound review


Now after ~150 hrs. burn in time, i will share my impressions with these outstanding caps.

I had a déjà vu after changing from my previous Mundorf Suprem silver/gold/oil caps to the Duelund CAST PIO Copper.
The same difference as in my 300B mono block´s.

This openness, clarity, three-dimensionality with so many more subtleties and micro informations, absolute breathtaking.
Only the Duelund CAST has the possibility to reproduce this 3D soundstage
...
dvb projekt's Avatar
diyAudio Member
Views 1625 Comments 3 dvb projekt is offline
Old

J-Mo Mk. II vs. Szekeres, distortion comparison

Posted 3rd May 2013 at 08:24 AM by rjm (RJM Audio Blog)
Updated 5th May 2013 at 11:52 PM by rjm

Two headphone amplifiers sharing the same basic MOSFET source follower output stage.

When the source current and source resistance are optimized for the given headphone load and similar maximum output power (~50 mW at 1% THD), the distortion pattern vs. output power is remarkably similar.

One plot below is simulation, the other measurements. The J-Mo 2 simulation closely matched the actual measurements, it wasn't worth my while to generate a full simulated data set when I already had the measurements on hand. No reason to suspect that the Szekeres sim is inaccurate, either.

The take home message is the distortion characteristic of a MOSFET follower is what it is, and unavoidable. Take it or leave it, as it were. However - and this is key - if you don't optimize the stage for the headphone impedance, the distortion for a given output power will increase significantly.

As an aside: Greg did his homework with the original circuit....
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	szekeres THD sim.png
Views:	383
Size:	27.4 KB
ID:	980   Click image for larger version

Name:	jmo2 thd sim.png
Views:	429
Size:	32.1 KB
ID:	981   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMGP6429 1280.jpg
Views:	403
Size:	386.1 KB
ID:	982   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMGP6436 1280.jpg
Views:	615
Size:	408.4 KB
ID:	983  
rjm's Avatar
rjm
diyAudio Member
Views 1077 Comments 0 rjm is offline
Old

Szekeres Headphone Driver, distortion simulation

Posted 3rd May 2013 at 08:11 AM by rjm (RJM Audio Blog)
Updated 3rd May 2013 at 08:15 AM by rjm

I've always enjoyed the sound of the Greg Szekeres' Headphone Driver (buffer) and derivatives sharing the MOSFET source follower output stage.

I've often wondered however, whether it's distinctive sound is because it is unusually free from noise and artifacts, or because its unusually prone to heavy second harmonic distortion.

It's not hard to set this up in LTSpice, but I haven't seen it done before. So, for your education and enlightenment, I present the harmonic distortion vs. output power data for the original "classic" circuit as uploaded to Headwize all those years ago. The LTSpice asc file is also included I you want to play along. The harmonic data is generated by hand, reading the FFT peaks for 10 or so different input voltages.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	szekeres sim circuit.png
Views:	500
Size:	50.6 KB
ID:	976   Click image for larger version

Name:	szekeres THD sim 2.png
Views:	376
Size:	28.2 KB
ID:	978   Click image for larger version

Name:	szeke2.gif
Views:	1596
Size:	6.0 KB
ID:	979  
Attached Files
File Type: asc Szekeres.asc (2.1 KB, 229 views)
rjm's Avatar
rjm
diyAudio Member
Posted in The Lab
Views 1298 Comments 0 rjm is offline
Old

Power Up! - A Low Power Desktop Amp

Posted 28th April 2013 at 03:04 PM by BuildMeSomething
Updated 8th May 2013 at 06:38 PM by BuildMeSomething

The Amp boards arrived Saturday, unfortunately, I was just leaving for work so they'd have to wait. Everything looked OK on them.

Initial power up test was done with both LME49990 in place but only one LME49600 mounted on each channel [PSU used was a modified "The Wire" unit meant for testing the A/B Power Amp at +/-25Vdc, now set at +/-15Vdc. It was getting quite hot as it was dropping 10V per rail]. That went Ok, so the rest of the 49600 were put in place and powered up once more... Again, everything OK.

Measured offset:

Left channel: 27mV
Right channet: 8mV

Foam board speakers are progressing, and will be ordering a heatsink this week also.

Update [13-04-30]: Been a little bit worried about the higher offset value on the left channel, though it's not at a bad level overall. Once the amp has been on awhile, it appears to settle at 25.9 mV.

Made a quick SE input>volume pot AC coupled...
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	BMS_LPDA_1.JPG
Views:	1117
Size:	483.0 KB
ID:	968   Click image for larger version

Name:	BMS_LPDA_2.JPG
Views:	658
Size:	476.0 KB
ID:	969   Click image for larger version

Name:	mFonken_2.JPG
Views:	607
Size:	453.8 KB
ID:	984   Click image for larger version

Name:	mFonken_4.JPG
Views:	403
Size:	419.4 KB
ID:	985  
Attached Files
diyAudio Member
Posted in Uncategorized
Views 1387 Comments 6 BuildMeSomething is offline
Old

Force/sense shunt

Posted 24th April 2013 at 08:35 AM by abraxalito
Updated 24th May 2013 at 03:59 AM by abraxalito (Added pics of prototype fs-shunt. Added noise update.)

I'm a recent convert of the lowest possible impedance of power supply based on my experience of adding caps to my chipamp. So I figure the signal stages can't be harmed by reducing their supply impedance either, particularly at LF.

I note there are a few aftermarket regulators around - I had a look at Paul Hynes and Belleson in the past few days. They're a bit pricey for my tastes, given the cost of the components they're using can't be over single digit $ so I've had a look at "doing it at home, only cheaper".

First off, a simple TL431 is about the best bang for the buck achievable, as the part here is 0.2rmb. But the dynamic impedance is typically 0.2ohms and I was hoping and aiming to go a bit lower than this - perhaps an order of magnitude lower, to around 10mohms. Lower than this and the resistance of the PCB tracks come into play and its also very hard to maintain such a low impedance beyond the audio band as cap ESRs (for the best ones) are of...
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	fs-shunt-LTSpice.png
Views:	1497
Size:	25.5 KB
ID:	966   Click image for larger version

Name:	fs-shunt-plot.png
Views:	367
Size:	5.6 KB
ID:	967   Click image for larger version

Name:	fs-shunt-alpha.png
Views:	357
Size:	210.7 KB
ID:	970   Click image for larger version

Name:	fs-shunt-alpha-rev.png
Views:	428
Size:	188.8 KB
ID:	971  
Attached Files
abraxalito's Avatar
diyAudio Member
Views 1323 Comments 1 abraxalito is online now
Old

Active elliptic - practical implementation

Posted 20th April 2013 at 09:33 AM by abraxalito

Here's the first channel under construction on 2mm pitch double-sided proto board. The opamps in this instance are AD8014 in SOT23-5 packages, hence the choice of the 2mm pitch board. Power supplies will go on another board to be attached to the reverse side.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	active-ellptic.png
Views:	281
Size:	891.7 KB
ID:	965  
Attached Files
abraxalito's Avatar
diyAudio Member
Posted in Uncategorized
Views 524 Comments 0 abraxalito is online now
Old

Discrete transistor line amplifier stage mod 1

Posted 19th April 2013 at 10:24 PM by rjm (RJM Audio Blog)
Updated 20th April 2013 at 05:04 AM by rjm

Changed the collector load on the voltage amplifier stage to a current source (Q3), as per the Marantz SR2285B circuit.

Also increased the resistance of the feedback connection, R6+R8, there seemed to be no obvious advantage in making it much smaller than the typical load (>10k). The compensation capacitor C2 is increased to match, to flatten the HF response.

The circuit can drive light loads to +20 dB. Of course that's not much of a challenge for this general class of circuit.

I'm a bit stumped as to what the next logical step is from here. Seems to me to depend on what you actually want the circuit to do.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	RJM discrete mod1.png
Views:	1121
Size:	59.2 KB
ID:	963  
Attached Files
File Type: asc RJM discrete mod1.asc (3.5 KB, 170 views)
rjm's Avatar
rjm
diyAudio Member
Posted in The Lab
Views 1003 Comments 0 rjm is offline
Old

Progressing - Low Power Desktop Amp

Posted 19th April 2013 at 09:49 AM by BuildMeSomething
Updated 25th April 2013 at 08:36 AM by BuildMeSomething

Holiday: Bad weather to a point it was near impossible to take a steady photograph due to the gusting winds. Hiding from the winds meant poor vantage points, very much non-idealistic for photographing landscapes.

Digi-key: The order turned up on the Monday morning, roughly 10 minutes before leaving. The PSU boards must have arrived mid week, a neighbour had those...

The parts order was enough components for one power supply and one amp. The PSU is assembled but untested as yet. The toroidal and 10K Alps RK27 are to be ordered from RS Components later today.

PCB issues: C1-C6... this is where trusting the people who generate default libraries for FreePCB falls down and my inexperience shows. Lead diameter on the caps is 28MIL, default part through-hole diameter is 28MIL... Each lead needed a quick file to reduce its width enough to fit the board. No other issues to report.

I don't think I could have made the overall size of the board...
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	BMS_PSU_1.JPG
Views:	283
Size:	327.1 KB
ID:	960   Click image for larger version

Name:	BMS_PSU_2.JPG
Views:	325
Size:	316.9 KB
ID:	961   Click image for larger version

Name:	BMS_PSU_3.JPG
Views:	296
Size:	323.9 KB
ID:	962  
Attached Files
diyAudio Member
Posted in Uncategorized
Views 585 Comments 0 BuildMeSomething is offline
Hide this!Advertise here!

New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:13 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2016 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2016 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2
Wiki