diyAudio - Comments
Go Back   Home > Forums > Blogs

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
  1. Old Comment

    dantimax (contact information)

    Thanks for some input. Now I know what direction it seems I have to take. Unfortunately I all ready ordered the three remote and volume pieces at a sum of $265.55 . The money was taken ! My best avenue at this point is I am going to try to see what my credit card bank can do about getting a return on my money.....
    Heads up to all.
    permalink
    Posted Today at 03:38 PM by djg440 djg440 is offline
  2. Old Comment
    abraxalito's Avatar

    My latest infatuation - transformers

    Update on the Mod-86 saga - I have now caught sight of a schematic for it. Regulators for the three opamps are indeed LM317L/337L and there's no passive filtering on their inputs, just the usual 100nF input cap. Hence HF rejection, especially on the -ve rail, is going to be poor. The total current draw on these regs looks to be about 10mA which results in a 20kHz output impedance of the order of 4ohms.
    My concerns on the thread were initially about the classAB operation of the THAT1200 - however that is dwarfed by the classAB operation of the LME49710 - it sees a load about 1.3k hence its peak output current is just shy of 10mA. To a first order then the peak excursion on the supply rails could reach 40mV.
    permalink
    Posted Yesterday at 02:09 AM by abraxalito abraxalito is offline
  3. Old Comment
    abraxalito's Avatar

    Supercapacitor b*ll*cks

    Yes its constant on the timescale of music signals, except for the effect of the ESR. Since the ESR of the total bank is about 30mohm this is going to result in some audio-induced ripple voltage, assuming that the powered circuits aren't pure classA. If we assume that ripple below the audio band doesn't matter then a 30mohm ESR gives the same ripple at 20Hz as roughly 0.25F. So I reckon a cap bank (using normal caps) bigger than 250,000uF will out-perform this supercap bank in practice.
    permalink
    Posted Yesterday at 01:09 AM by abraxalito abraxalito is offline
  4. Old Comment

    Supercapacitor b*ll*cks

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by abraxalito View Comment
    Very good points. I was picturing a ripple waveform as I was reading your writing - this supercapacitor powered unit is just like a vastly slowed down version of a direct mains powered unit. The ripple voltage is still there - I wonder how much ripple they accept on their 24V rails? That's obviously rail noise and with 9 supercaps in series the impedance isn't particularly low.
    Right. Even if the ripple voltage is still high, if it is slowed down to be discharging and charging over several seconds it is essentially constant when compared to music signals, e.g. Fripple << Faudio or Fripple ~ 0.1Hz while 20Hz < Faudio <20kHz. This could be considered advantageous in an of itself. But as other have pointed out, how does the cap bank really compare to a good quality PS across the board, and in the balance is it really any improvement or just a new approach that doesn't really improve on the tried and true transformer>CRC>linear regulator arrangement.
    permalink
    Posted 27th February 2015 at 06:06 PM by CharlieLaub CharlieLaub is offline
  5. Old Comment

    dantimax (contact information)

    I order and pay for a chip by Dantimax.1 year ago..he never sent it to me..have talk to his mother on telefone,,no result

    If it was me i will not buy anything there

    he do not answer mail...have sent many of them

    Best Bjarne
    permalink
    Posted 27th February 2015 at 04:45 PM by beardman beardman is offline
  6. Old Comment
    mlloyd1's Avatar

    Which is better, Sennheiser HD600 or AKG K702?

    thanks for sharing.

    interestingly, my conclusions actually coincides with yours, but probably for different reasons . i describe my headphones sound preference as "airy, natural and real". HD600 fits this sound to me better than any headphones i've heard (but i haven't listened to any of the planar designs nor any electrostatics yet). the AKG sounds too "live" or too "forward" or "in your face" to me; sounding "more like listening to speakers" is a good way to describe it.

    my musical tastes are pretty wide: i listen to jazz, fusion, big band, classic rock, folk, classical, electronic, latin/brazilian and audiobooks. i used to have the older (original?) version of Beyer DT990 and they really worked well for me for many years. i heard the HD600 at a CES show and decided immediately they would be next when my Beyers died. that time came and i went shopping. i listened to several models including the HD600, HD650, AKG701/702 and others. several people who's opinions i value about such things said "get the AKG's; you'll be happier". But from my tests, i wasn't. unfortunately, all this effort was made moot - during this process, i got married and my wife bought me the Sennheiser HD598 as a surprise for Christmas. After building a stronger amp (HD598 are low impedance), i find i prefer the HD598 over the AKG but they don't quite sound as good as the HD600 (or even my old Beyers if i trust my memory ).

    I'm hoping Sennheiser keeps making the HD600 because I will eventually get a pair. I'm one of those that even prefers the HD600 over the HD650. I have my hearing tested/measured periodically since I'm older (56) and for years have had a dip in both ears from about 1KHz to 5KHz. Plus, the "old age" roll-off starts kicking in about 15KHz now. I suspect my hearing significantly contributes to my sound preferences compared to my friends. I must admit I am often amused by some of the threads I read on DIYAudio and other groups that suggest some of the similarly elder members have high-end hearing comparable to bats; I'd really like to see their hearing measurement results

    mlloyd1
    permalink
    Posted 26th February 2015 at 08:19 PM by mlloyd1 mlloyd1 is offline
  7. Old Comment
    rjm's Avatar

    Supercapacitor b*ll*cks

    If the capacitors are in series then the capacitance is no longer the algebraic sum of the values printed on the can. Just as the "total resistance" of two 100 kohm resistors in parallel isn't 200 kohms.

    I suppose they can wiggle out of that by saying the capacitance reflects the physical parts count, and I doubt the intended market for those gadgets is savvy enough to appreciate the distinction anyway.
    permalink
    Posted 25th February 2015 at 05:26 AM by rjm rjm is offline
  8. Old Comment
    abraxalito's Avatar

    Supercapacitor b*ll*cks

    Very good points. I was picturing a ripple waveform as I was reading your writing - this supercapacitor powered unit is just like a vastly slowed down version of a direct mains powered unit. The ripple voltage is still there - I wonder how much ripple they accept on their 24V rails? That's obviously rail noise and with 9 supercaps in series the impedance isn't particularly low.
    permalink
    Posted 24th February 2015 at 04:24 AM by abraxalito abraxalito is offline
  9. Old Comment

    Supercapacitor b*ll*cks

    I sense some new math in the first comment here by Mr Johnson. He is correct in that 1A = 1C/s but he forgets that any old current can not be delivered into a load unless there is sufficient potential to do so. To state that 5A can drive a 4 ohm load to 50W is a bit misleading when not also stating that the potential must be maintained at or above a voltage equal to V = P/R. Assuming he is talking about clean peak power, then V = 50/4 or 12.5 Vpk. Now think about how the charge reaches the load - it starts in a capacitor bank and then goes through an amplifier with some efficiency before reaching the load. A capacitor discharges according to an exponential law - that is the voltage across the terminals falls exponentially as charge is removed.

    Because of the need to maintain a certain voltage to power the load, and because of the exponential decay of the capacitor's potential, it would seem that the duration that the isolated cap bank can support the load is much less than what one might think using Mr Johnson's argument. I would guess that the limiting factor is actually the voltage that the cap bank can support at any given instant that determined when the re-charging cycle must begin. Even when the average playback level is low, you need voltage headroom for short duration music transients if you want to claim "high fidelity" reproduction that is true to the source. Thus the caps must remain highly charged to retain a high potential that can serve the amplifier as needed by program demand.
    permalink
    Posted 23rd February 2015 at 04:53 PM by CharlieLaub CharlieLaub is offline
  10. Old Comment
    rjm's Avatar

    Gustard H10 Headphone Amplifier

    I doubt it would make much of a difference replacing either the NE5532s or the OPA134s. Both are pretty solid choices.
    permalink
    Posted 23rd February 2015 at 12:18 PM by rjm rjm is offline
  11. Old Comment

    Gustard H10 Headphone Amplifier

    Thanks for replying. My knowledge of all this is absolutely minimal. But that raises two questions, if you don't mind. First, would sticking the NE5532 in the balanced-to-single-ended conversion for the input XLR make a difference to the sound--assuming you would then use XLR imput?
    Second, can you see any easy ways of upgrading the H10, for example by replacing the OPA134s with better ones?
    Thanks again...
    permalink
    Posted 23rd February 2015 at 08:59 AM by asaifa asaifa is offline
  12. Old Comment
    rjm's Avatar

    Gustard H10 Headphone Amplifier

    The NE5532 are dual op amps, they won't replace the main OPA134s, only the NE5532 already used in the balanced-to-single-ended conversion for the input XLR.
    permalink
    Posted 22nd February 2015 at 11:32 PM by rjm rjm is offline
  13. Old Comment

    Gustard H10 Headphone Amplifier

    Hi. Thanks for writing down your impressions. I've been looking at the H10 for some time, as it is quite affordable. I have a pair of Dexa NE5532s which I used in an Eastern Electric Minimax Dac. But I sold the dac and would like to use the Dexa opamps elsewhere. Do you think it would be an improvement putting them in the H10?
    Thanks...
    permalink
    Posted 22nd February 2015 at 02:24 PM by asaifa asaifa is offline
  14. Old Comment
    rjm's Avatar

    Z-reg II improved simple Zener voltage regulator

    Food for thought. I'll look into it!
    permalink
    Posted 22nd February 2015 at 01:32 PM by rjm rjm is offline
  15. Old Comment
    dimkasta's Avatar

    Z-reg II improved simple Zener voltage regulator

    You can also try a small film cap near the gate to eliminate higher frequency switching stuff

    Salas on his BiB for example is filtering his led reference with 0.22uF

    A gyrator is also an interesting idea used by Matrin from acoustica

    He uses it on the raw supply though to fix the high frequency limitations of the LM series, but it would be interesting to see it filtering the reference too...

    Using 3-pin regulators off-piste: part 2
    permalink
    Posted 22nd February 2015 at 11:44 AM by dimkasta dimkasta is online now
  16. Old Comment
    6L6's Avatar

    Where I'm standing today, DIY F4's to begin soon.

    You need to use (8) 22,000uf caps per PSU board, not (4). Or (8) 15,000uf. Whatever get you to approximately 120,000uf or more per board.
    permalink
    Posted 21st February 2015 at 03:59 PM by 6L6 6L6 is online now
  17. Old Comment

    Superregs for your line-level projects

    Hi Jan

    Thank you for sharing this great circuit.

    In your view is it suitable to provide the 12vdc I need to power my PicoPSU (DC to DC ATX) which is plugged into my audio PC? At the moment I use an old TTI bench supply to provide a low ripple/low noise 12v to the Pico PSU. The bench supply disply shows the computer is drawing about 1.2amps while playing music.

    Would I need to upgrade the capacitors and diodes to cope with the 18vdc input to give me 12v out?

    Regards
    Is there a higher power alternative to the amp AD825 please? can't see one on Mouser or RS
    permalink
    Posted 18th February 2015 at 11:05 AM by SteveHolt SteveHolt is offline
    Updated 18th February 2015 at 11:10 AM by SteveHolt
  18. Old Comment
    abraxalito's Avatar

    Supercapacitor b*ll*cks

    Right - so what problem is being solved here by having the two banks of supercaps and switching between them? I rather suspect its all down to marketing narrative - once a company has established its story (which for Red Wine was in a major part the isolation from mains power) then it can't go back on that. Even though sufficient isolation from mains power is possible without resorting to the complexities of supercap charging/switching.
    permalink
    Posted 17th February 2015 at 12:27 AM by abraxalito abraxalito is offline
  19. Old Comment
    fas42's Avatar

    Supercapacitor b*ll*cks

    Hmmm, I've thought of trying something like this concept - the trick is to completely isolate the charging circuitry from the playback area - unless there is zero, audible cross interference there is no point ...

    The proof of the pudding is in the ... . Experiments should determine whether there is significant gain in SQ performance using this more complex approach, and whether that gain is worth the money. In my own high energy gainclone, there was no noticeable variation in the tonality while the amplifier was playing off "battery" power, having pulled the mains lead from the wall socket.

    So, solving problems? IME, there are numerous ways of doing "it" -whatever works, and/or floats your boat ...
    permalink
    Posted 17th February 2015 at 12:00 AM by fas42 fas42 is offline
  20. Old Comment
    wlowes's Avatar

    2013 Holiday Projects - Ridding the system of resistor problems

    Hi Polaron
    Sorry I missed your comment. In my understanding there is absolutely no difference technically/sonically between the $350 assembled unit from Intact Audio and the AVC pair at $200. The assembled version would be very easy, and provides a second fine tuning control. I took th eless expensive route and wired it myself. Took me an afternoon to assemble and wire. I have never needed a finer step in volume than the basic 3db step provided.
    I expect your setup will be very good, but Dave Slagle will happily comment if your system is appropriate for an AVC.
    permalink
    Posted 16th February 2015 at 06:52 PM by wlowes wlowes is online now
Hide this!Advertise here!

New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:19 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2015 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2015 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2