diyAudio - Uncategorized
Go Back   Home > Forums > Blogs > abraxalito

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Uncategorized Entries with no category
Old

At last, NXP has a low-end, low-power Cortex M4

Posted 8th November 2014 at 02:46 AM by abraxalito
Updated 8th November 2014 at 03:00 AM by abraxalito

NXP's ARM offerings I find to be the most power efficient and I've searched for a long time for a current-sipping M4 which is available in a lowish pin count package. Up until now the best offering in that realm has been STM's F411 with 13mA @ 100MHz. NXP's latest offering the LPC54100 beats that by a healthy margin, turning in a sub-10mA draw at the same clock rate. There's also a dual-core variant with a 100MHz M0+ with around half the current requirement. Respect - the fly in the ointment though is only 2 SPI peripherals which don't support TI mode. Pricing looks great at $2/10k.

http://www.nxp.com/news/press-releas...ng-market.html
abraxalito's Avatar
diyAudio Member
Posted in Uncategorized
Views 304 Comments 0 abraxalito is offline
Old

Taobao has a TDA1387 DAC (apparently)

Posted 23rd October 2014 at 03:33 AM by abraxalito
Updated 15th January 2015 at 02:19 AM by abraxalito

Its rather difficult to work out whether there's a line-level output here or if the phono sockets are inputs to the LM1875 amps. The TDA1387 is a plug-in module for the USB-input DAC section which might feed only the amps. Anyone who's good at reading Chinese, please contribute in the comments

http://item.taobao.com/item.htm?spm=...8-3f2abc0f8bd9

Update - seems one particular vendor has quite a range of TDA1387 DACs now, all very affordable. The cheapest is this one (48rmb kit, 88rmb built in my limited understanding) - http://item.taobao.com/item.htm?spm=2013.1.20141002.7.yoDoCx&scm=1007.100 09.2083.i41769520252&id=41937738376&pvid=402c7a10-8221-4bca-82c0-99c1c511877f.
This one has 8 chips, I guess its a tribute DAC to the DAC-AH - http://item.taobao.com/item.htm?spm=...cket=17#detail...
abraxalito's Avatar
diyAudio Member
Posted in Uncategorized
Views 557 Comments 2 abraxalito is offline
Old

Amplifier-centric two-way XO (and system) design

Posted 3rd July 2014 at 05:30 AM by abraxalito
Updated 5th July 2014 at 03:55 PM by abraxalito

The traditional view is that the speakers are the weakest link of the audio system and hence they're not really designed with amplifiers in mind. Why make amp design easier when speakers are plenty hard enough to get right?

In my experience speakers don't contribute very much to the listening satisfaction. They're more a matter of taste, but a much better speaker can't undo the faults of an amplifier (or DAC for that matter). That's not to say some speakers don't sound better than others - I mostly prefer my Paiyons to the much cheaper Denons but their 'betterness' is orthogonal to the way to the manner DACs and amps sound better. Electronics has had the biggest impact on my listening satisfaction so far so here is an XO designed to make the electronics' job as easy as possible.

Given that the critical parameters of an amp designed for listener satisfaction aren't THD+N and FR, rather multitone IMD (aka MTPR) and PSRR it makes sense that an amp is given the narrowest...
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	twowaysch.jpg
Views:	125
Size:	56.4 KB
ID:	1319   Click image for larger version

Name:	twowayXO.jpg
Views:	60
Size:	83.3 KB
ID:	1320  
abraxalito's Avatar
diyAudio Member
Posted in Uncategorized
Views 483 Comments 5 abraxalito is offline
Old

Just for fun - an ultra-low impedance AIF

Posted 19th June 2014 at 12:40 AM by abraxalito

DIYing high enough Q inductors for anti-imaging filters is a bit of a challenge so here's another way to approach this. I found its possible to build very high Q inductors by simply slipping ferrite beads over a fairly thick copper wire. The limitation though is that the beads I have offer about 1.2uH per bead. So making a ferrite bead version of a 660uH inductor will call for over 500 beads - rather impractical.

To make such a ferrite bead inductor filter a practical possibility its necessary to work at a much lower impedance. I've taken a 1ohm working impedance inititally to develop this filter. Now the largest inductor just needs 10 beads. Given this very low impedance the post-amplifier's noise performance becomes rather a challenge - but a transformer will probably do the trick nicely. I plan to try this with a 1:7 step up trafo and see how it goes.

This kind of filter is probably very suitable for DACs with higher output current - the communications type...
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	ultra-low-Z-AIF.jpg
Views:	98
Size:	32.9 KB
ID:	1308  
abraxalito's Avatar
diyAudio Member
Posted in Uncategorized
Views 317 Comments 0 abraxalito is offline
Old

Tweeter line level passive XO

Posted 13th June 2014 at 05:47 AM by abraxalito
Updated 16th June 2014 at 05:51 AM by abraxalito

I'm really impressed with the bang for the buck with my 228rmb speakers, but have a theory they're rather being limited by their crossover. Especially the first order tweeter crossover which hasn't enough LF rejection.

In search of a steeper XO for the tweeter I've decided to go the whole hog and design a kick-*** filter that'll allow me to fully activate these puppies and see just how much they're limited by their electronics. kinku just pointed me to a filter design program called AADE which I've just finished using to design my first LC bandpass filter.

Its bandpass because I want to stick it straight after the DAC and it needs the anti-imaging function, meaning a steep low pass around 18kHz. The tweeter doesn't need this as they're fairly low on IMD, but the tweeter amp sure benefits from having no ultrasonics. Hence here is my first attempt at a tweeter bandpass filter, to go between the DAC and a dedicated tweeter amp.

For now I'll use the TDA1521...
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	PLLtweeterXO.jpg
Views:	159
Size:	37.5 KB
ID:	1303   Click image for larger version

Name:	TWeeter bandpass FR.jpg
Views:	106
Size:	95.3 KB
ID:	1304   Click image for larger version

Name:	TweeterXO.JPG
Views:	161
Size:	716.7 KB
ID:	1305   Click image for larger version

Name:	5thordertweet.jpg
Views:	120
Size:	38.7 KB
ID:	1307  
abraxalito's Avatar
diyAudio Member
Posted in Uncategorized
Views 782 Comments 17 abraxalito is offline
Old

Linsley Hood amp on Taobao

Posted 4th June 2014 at 06:27 AM by abraxalito

Looks like a bargain, around $120. Sorely tempted to get one to play with - what do you think ?
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	JLH.jpg
Views:	390
Size:	58.8 KB
ID:	1301  
abraxalito's Avatar
diyAudio Member
Posted in Uncategorized
Views 1094 Comments 8 abraxalito is offline
Old

Cheapo passive speakers breaking in

Posted 1st June 2014 at 07:02 AM by abraxalito
Updated 2nd June 2014 at 04:54 AM by abraxalito

A pair of these were delivered yesterday. At first I thought their bass sucked and the top end was too 'phasy' - it was only after a while I realized I'd connected them out of phase

Now they're wired up correctly on my TDA1521 amps, they're starting to come on-stream. I rate them as a bargain at the asking price of 228rmb (around $35).

After they've fully broken in I plan to explore what the lowest hanging fruit is by way of tweaks to the crossover....

Update1 - here's the XO, very simple 1st order. 250uH inductor on the bass (0.1ohm DCR, 6ohm bass/mid) and 1.5uF cap for the tweeter (8ohm). The NP cap for the tweeter has a rather high ESR (3ohms at 1kHz) so there might be some mileage in substituting this for a foil cap.

Plotting this arrangement on LTSpice gives a crossover frequency (if -6dB) around 7kHz which seems a little high. If we were to assume a -3dB crossover (because they're in quadrature for a 1st order) then it would...
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Denon228s.jpg
Views:	107
Size:	12.4 KB
ID:	1295   Click image for larger version

Name:	DenonXO.JPG
Views:	139
Size:	678.4 KB
ID:	1299  
abraxalito's Avatar
diyAudio Member
Posted in Uncategorized
Views 434 Comments 6 abraxalito is offline
Old

TDA1521 chip amps rock!

Posted 23rd May 2014 at 04:13 AM by abraxalito

Here's my prototype TDA1521 dual mono arrangement - two chips per channel in bridged/parallel, sat atop 400,000uF hexacaps. The neutrality has taken a while to get used to but I'm lovin' em....
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	P1010105.JPG
Views:	445
Size:	711.2 KB
ID:	1292  
abraxalito's Avatar
diyAudio Member
Posted in Uncategorized
Views 562 Comments 4 abraxalito is offline
Old

Triton One speaker unveiled at CES

Posted 17th January 2014 at 03:45 AM by abraxalito
Updated 17th January 2014 at 03:57 AM by abraxalito

Just for a change from DACs, here's a speaker which caught my eye.

http://www.avsforum.com/t/1511825/go...ne-at-ces-2014

Now how much of its improved SQ over rivals three or more times the price is going to be down to the active bass section offloading the most PSU-draining signals from the driving poweramp? The comments about the scale of the soundstage do reflect the kinds of improvements I've been getting by reducing LF noise in my DAC, so the reduced LF noise from the poweramp from having a more benign load to drive could indeed be key. 92dB efficiency certainly helps a lot in reducing poweramp PSU stress.

That article says this speaker is 'sure to shake up the industry'. Really? What do you guys think?
abraxalito's Avatar
diyAudio Member
Posted in Uncategorized
Views 722 Comments 17 abraxalito is offline
Old

Stereophile's measurements of dCS Vivaldi DAC

Posted 9th January 2014 at 03:59 PM by abraxalito

John Atkinson's 'WOW!' (more than once) to his measurement results from the Vivaldi DAC prompted me to have a closer look at how it does for noise modulation.

The AP's FFTs shown don't come with details about the number of points in the FFTs, so noise estimates are a tiny bit tricky. However there is enough detail to make some reasonable estimates.

I've attached the plot from which I'm making my estimates - if anyone notices I've made a slip-up, please do comment and correct me.

The red line shows white noise at peak level of -4dBfs. I generated white noise in Audacity at this level to compare - with the maximum 16k point FFT and BH windowing, I got the same level of noise as on this plot - -42dBfs in 22kHz bandwidth. That suggests to me that the FFT shown has 64k points.

Another way to estimate the noise is by looking at the difference between the blue plot (19.1kHz, 0dBfs) grass and the red. To my eye, the difference in level is 76dBr...
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	DCS-vivaldi-FFT.png
Views:	219
Size:	163.4 KB
ID:	1211  
abraxalito's Avatar
diyAudio Member
Posted in Uncategorized
Views 852 Comments 1 abraxalito is offline
Hide this!Advertise here!

New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:02 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2015 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2015 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2