diyAudio - abraxalito
Go Back   Home > Forums > Blogs

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Old

Insider story on Intel's FinFETs - allegedly...

Posted 27th July 2012 at 05:00 AM by abraxalito

Here's an interesting article where Warren East is commenting on ARM's competition with Intel. But for the sting in the tail, scroll down to the comments. The first one appears to be from an Intel insider - fascinating stuff. Let's hope it doesn't get pulled

ARM, TSMC lead Intel in SoC, says CEO East

He (nc3) says :

Intel's 22nm also has much higher leakage, cost, worse analog, worse RF, worse high V transistors in terms of specs and the type of devices offered.
abraxalito's Avatar
diyAudio Member
Views 728 Comments 0 abraxalito is offline
Old

Nvidia wants a divorce from TSMC?

Posted 18th July 2012 at 03:08 AM by abraxalito

This article is a fascinating peep behind the curtain of the current economics of semiconductor production through the eyes of a major IP player - Nvidia. More evidence that Moore's Law is grinding to a screeching halt I suggest.

Nvidia deeply unhappy with TSMC, claims 20nm essentially worthless | ExtremeTech
abraxalito's Avatar
diyAudio Member
Posted in Uncategorized
Views 800 Comments 4 abraxalito is offline
Old

Mathematics of DAC droop correction

Posted 29th June 2012 at 05:09 AM by abraxalito

Here's one of the clearest articles I've seen which explains the background and a couple of solutions to DAC roll-off.

Flatten DAC frequency response | EDN

Both the solutions proposed compromise the dynamic range. My own solution, a hybrid analog/digital approach relies on DACs being cheap - I've termed it 'LAID' which stands for 'Longitudinal Array of Inexpensive DACs'.
abraxalito's Avatar
diyAudio Member
Views 756 Comments 0 abraxalito is offline
Old

Prototype MOS DAC

Posted 23rd June 2012 at 08:22 AM by abraxalito

The prototype is listenable now, but a bit too much background noise/hum pickup to do serious listening. It needs an on-board post filter and amp, which I'm working on now. In the meantime, here's the pics - the DAC itself is built of 5 'dac-sleds' each with a stack of 4 chips. The 'sleds' are then arranged around the central tower holding the resistor ladder. A separate board handles the timing logic and 18 tap delay line.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	P1010084.JPG
Views:	634
Size:	712.4 KB
ID:	715   Click image for larger version

Name:	P1010081.JPG
Views:	1267
Size:	714.1 KB
ID:	716   Click image for larger version

Name:	P1010078.JPG
Views:	602
Size:	694.0 KB
ID:	717  
abraxalito's Avatar
diyAudio Member
Views 1521 Comments 3 abraxalito is offline
Old

Evolving NOS -> MOS

Posted 9th June 2012 at 07:13 AM by abraxalito

Fixing the NOS droop has the undesirable side-effect of making the imaging components worse - HF gain can't be increased up to 20kHz and then suddenly taken away above 22kHz

In the spirit of taming the near-ultrasonic emissons of a NOS DAC, I'm currently playing with an MOS design - where 'M' stands for 'minimal'. I've been wondering if the attractiveness of the NOS sound will still be preserved if I go to 2X OS in order to fix up the ultrasonics. No practical analog filter can have a sharp enough band edge so a digital one it does have to be...

A DSP implemented digital filter comes at a price - that of throwing away some bits (I'm still using only 16bit DAC chips - TDA1387) so I'm now exploring using a transversal filter (no DSP) to carry out 2X OS. The LTSpice screen grab shows the architecture I'm playing with - a 19 tap delay line feeding 19 separate DACs. The DACs are shown on the right as current sources and their individual weightings are...
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	LTSpice_MOS.png
Views:	476
Size:	36.9 KB
ID:	698   Click image for larger version

Name:	LTS_MOS_FR.png
Views:	204
Size:	4.2 KB
ID:	699  
abraxalito's Avatar
diyAudio Member
Views 1015 Comments 1 abraxalito is offline
Old

DACalito - transversal modification of DAC-AH Lite

Posted 30th April 2012 at 06:46 AM by abraxalito

Plenty of audio DIYers have discovered what an excellent modding base the DAC-AH Lite is. I'm a latecomer to the party, but better late than never here's my contribution to the art of DAC-AH-alikes.

Most of the mods I've seen focus on the output stage, some upgrade the PSUs. Here's yet another variant - change the DACs. The TDA1545 is pin compatible with the TDA1543 so I swapped out 8 TDA1543s and replaced them with 8 DAC-stacks made up of 5 TDA1545s each. 32 DACs in parallel produce the normal NOS output, the additional 8 DACs are fed from a two-stage delay line (16 74HC595s) to correct for the zero-order hold. I/V conversion is done passively and differential - 1.3ohms in each polarity. The post I/V stage is a pair of AD605s giving a true differential output. In between the two is a passive filter made up of TDK ferrite beads and NP0 capacitors.

How does it all sound? - well of course one is always biassed when describing one's own offspring, but in a word...
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	P1010072.JPG
Views:	1104
Size:	686.1 KB
ID:	661   Click image for larger version

Name:	P1010060.JPG
Views:	1357
Size:	712.6 KB
ID:	662  
abraxalito's Avatar
diyAudio Member
Views 2183 Comments 2 abraxalito is offline
Old

Using Audacity to do NOS droop correction

Posted 29th April 2012 at 03:36 AM by abraxalito

If you have a NOS DAC (like a Metrum) and are curious to hear how it sounds with the zero-order hold corrected, here's a fairly simple way to try out my 3-tap filter using Audacity.

Load up the file you'd like to process and make two duplicates (select original and use Ctrl-D) - we'll call them A and B. We need to apply delay and gain to A and B which we do with Audacity's time-shift button (in the group of 6 tool buttons to the right of the transport buttons) and the 'Effects - Amplify' feature. A is shifted one sample to the right, and B, two samples right. I've shown how this looks with a mono chirp signal in the first image.

The gain is input into Audacity in dB so 0.15 becomes -16.5dB and 0.026 is -31.7dB. These are the gains for A and B, respectively. A needs to be inverted too - use 'Effects - Invert'. The second screen grab shows how it looks after these operations (I hid the device toolbar to give more space for waveforms).

Having processed...
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	audacity_NOS1.png
Views:	149
Size:	30.5 KB
ID:	654   Click image for larger version

Name:	audacity_NOS2.png
Views:	137
Size:	29.0 KB
ID:	655   Click image for larger version

Name:	audacity_NOS3.png
Views:	158
Size:	23.4 KB
ID:	656  
abraxalito's Avatar
diyAudio Member
Views 868 Comments 0 abraxalito is offline
Old

First measurement of NOS droop correction

Posted 27th April 2012 at 06:13 AM by abraxalito

Here's a ten discrete tone test waveform played back into my Sony PCM-M10 then FFT'd in Audacity with 512point FFT.

Audacity reports lower freq tones at -18.6dB and the highest (17.3kHz) at -18.9dB - a droop of 0.3dB. This might be in part my passive (LC) reconstruction filter which I have yet to characterize separately. So it appears to work
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	transversal_freq_resp.png
Views:	242
Size:	25.8 KB
ID:	650  
abraxalito's Avatar
diyAudio Member
Views 557 Comments 0 abraxalito is offline
Old

Flattening the NOS droop

Posted 14th April 2012 at 03:13 AM by abraxalito
Updated 14th April 2012 at 03:48 AM by abraxalito

Having been a fan of NOS DACs now for something over a year I've decided it was high time for sorting out their most serious drawback - the roll off in the HF. This is an unavoidable result of using a zero-order hold function to reconstruct the original (impulse) samples. Droop exists even with oversampled DACs, its just at its most severe in NOS.

One of the most popular ways to flatten the response is to add on some kind of analog filter with a rising response (to 3.16dB @ 20kHz). A first order shelving filter can't quite cut it though so an LC tank circuit has been employed by a few. This needs to have a moderately high Q to achieve the correction.

I've played around with inductors to achieve this and haven't much liked the resulting sound. Whether this was due to the particular inductors I was using I didn't experiment. Admittedly they were very cheap ones. In general though when I've used high Q circuits in crossovers I haven't much liked the colouration...
abraxalito's Avatar
diyAudio Member
Views 959 Comments 4 abraxalito is offline
Old

ARM's cutest baby now has an even less hungry sister

Posted 16th March 2012 at 02:45 AM by abraxalito

Cortex-M0+ Processor - ARM

Just 11uW/MHz at 90nm so under 1mA current draw when running at 100MHz Freescale says they'll be first to show working silicon but I bet NXP will end up shipping the real volumes.
abraxalito's Avatar
diyAudio Member
Posted in Uncategorized
Views 601 Comments 0 abraxalito is offline
Hide this!Advertise here!

New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:27 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2