diyAudio - Digital
Go Back   Home > Forums > Blogs > abraxalito

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Digital Microcontrollers for audio signal processing
Old

Atmel plays fast and loose with its new chip's low power credentials

Posted 31st March 2015 at 02:26 AM by abraxalito
Updated 2nd April 2015 at 03:04 AM by abraxalito

On the face of it, this article gives the appearance that Atmel's raced into the lead by a substantial margin in the realm of low power ARM offerings - New ARM-powered chip aims for battery life measured in decades | Ars Technica

However a quick peek beneath the surface reveals all is not what it seems at first sight.

First a stand-out from the linked article :

Atmel, the San Jose-based microcontroller maker, today released samples of a new type of ultra-low power, ARM based microcontroller that could radically extend the battery life of small low-power intelligent devices. The new ... (MCUs) consume less than 35 microamps of power per megahertz of processing speed while active,

Radically eh? Less than 35 microamps /MHz is the claim here - wanna see how that stacks up?

Ostensibly the 35uA headline figure is a worthwhile improvement over NXP's latest offering - where NXP is claiming 55uA/MHz (the LPC5410x I posted about...
abraxalito's Avatar
diyAudio Member
Posted in Digital
Views 367 Comments 0 abraxalito is online now
Old

What's in a datasheet?

Posted 7th October 2011 at 05:38 AM by abraxalito
Updated 14th November 2012 at 01:47 AM by abraxalito (Updated with link to new article 14th Nov 2012)

Yesterday I had this very interesting exchange with RocketScientist about his open source design for a headphone amp, the O2.

http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/headp...ml#post2736266

The nub of the issue raised here is - should designers stick only to what datasheets tell them about parts or to what extent use what's 'common knowledge' about parts to eek out better performance?

I was surprised to learn from RS that offsets within dual opamps are so closely matched in practice - its a really new discovery for me. So why don't semiconductor manufacturers tout this feature? Or perhaps RS just 'got lucky' with the relatively few samples he tested?

My experience of reading opamp datasheets is that the specs for offsets (both the typicals and the max) degrade in going from single to dual devices, where the devices are all on one die. Let's have a look at a relevant opamp from...
abraxalito's Avatar
diyAudio Member
Views 1186 Comments 7 abraxalito is online now
Old

Jumping back on board the digital train - part IV

Posted 6th May 2011 at 03:52 AM by abraxalito

Where is all this going I hear you ask? What's his point? Well to tell the truth I don't hear anyone asking this - the comments sections are remarkably empty save for jkeny egging me on

So here's my point, and its a single word: convergence. Convergence is coming to digital architectures - indeed its already here, just the majority of people have yet to notice.

The diverse marketplace for embedded processors is rather similar to the market for home computers in the early to mid-1980s. It was hard to make the choice - Acorn, Sinclair, Apple, Commodore, Atari, Amstrad, Dragon? Then convergence arrived in the shape of the IBM PC and those brands (with the exception of Apple) were relegated to the history books.

It took quite a while after the 1983 arrival of the PC for this to occur. I had an Acorn Atom which I built from a kit in the long summer vacation after I graduated, and I didn't make the jump into PC-land until the early 1990s. It wasn't...
abraxalito's Avatar
diyAudio Member
Posted in Digital
Views 874 Comments 15 abraxalito is online now
Old

Jumping back on board the digital train - part III

Posted 1st May 2011 at 02:11 PM by abraxalito

Apart from an architecture which is attractive to program in, I also have several other demands on the checklist for the digital toys I'm going to pin my colours to. Ease of entry into the game and low cost development tools are a must.

Arduino is a phenomenon I did a little research into. Its become jolly popular over the past six years or so since its inception and I wanted to understand some of the reasons for its acceptance. One of the reasons has to be its open source nature. Another is the well written materials to get you going - they've put quite a lot of thought into the practical issues, even inventing their own vocabulary for elements in the process - 'sketches' springs to mind. If there's a weakness in what they're doing its this - its tied to Atmel as they're the vendors of the chips used. There are no second sources of the parts to my knowledge. This vendor-specific approach doesn't sit at all well with the open-source side - Atmel's architecture is unique...
abraxalito's Avatar
diyAudio Member
Posted in Digital
Views 602 Comments 1 abraxalito is online now
Old

Jumping back on board the digital train - part II

Posted 30th April 2011 at 05:46 AM by abraxalito
Updated 30th April 2011 at 05:50 AM by abraxalito

When I began writing real-time code for the 68k, the price of entry into the development game was rather high. My first project was a tachometer processor which my boss was applying on a patent for: US patent 4924420. In order to develop this we purchased a hardware emulator which became my pride and joy - it cost a sum equivalent to around two months of my salary at that time. This was a considerably more expensive solution than the other commonly used development technique in those days - EPROM emulators - it did though provide a much faster development path by virtue of providing a window into the interior of the CPU as well as a history in its trace buffer of everything it had done. During the course of this and subsequent projects which also used the 68k (later we added a 68020 too) I became a confirmed devotee of the architecture. One of my nicknames in the company was 'the cycle stealer' - if someone had some 68k code that wasn't running fast enough, I'd find some way to get it...
abraxalito's Avatar
diyAudio Member
Posted in Digital
Views 761 Comments 6 abraxalito is online now
Old

Jumping back on board the digital train - part I

Posted 26th April 2011 at 04:53 AM by abraxalito
Updated 30th April 2011 at 05:51 AM by abraxalito

My first brush with a micro as programmer was as a schoolboy - my maths teacher had a National Semiconductor SC/MP board with LEDs and toggle switches. It could be programmed in binary. I was hooked.

About a year later Science of Cambridge came out with adverts for their Mk14, using the same SC/MP. This though had a real hex keyboard and calculator style 8 digit 7 segment display. I ordered one almost immediately I saw the ad. Trouble is, it seemed to take an age to come. Someone joked that Clive Sinclair's approach was to gather up the cheques and when he'd got a few thousand pay someone to do the design! I dialled SoC's number so many times chasing my order that its still engrained in my memory over 30 years later: 0223 311488.

When I got to uni, it was clear my room-mate was in a league above me - he'd designed a system with a Z80. That was a real man's processor, compared to my little boy SC/MP. I felt a tad threatened by his prowess. Science of Cambridge...
abraxalito's Avatar
diyAudio Member
Posted in Digital
Views 768 Comments 7 abraxalito is online now
Hide this!Advertise here!

New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 03:16 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2015 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2015 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2