|
|
#221 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Czyżeminek, near Łódź
|
Quote:
![]() You essentially have just: - CS8412 IC and its power supply - TDA1543 IC and its power supply - 1 input resistor for CS, 3 output resistors for TDA, 2 output caps and 1 resistor+1cap for PLL filter. I think that's all. The schematic only looks daunting because the power supplies are very sophisticated, but you could use a much simpler arrangement and still get very good sound. Quote:
If you are using Bobken regs, I would go for a 15-33uF Os-Con at the output, although you might prefer Starget in the TDA regulator. Keep in mind, these are still not quite as good as the Black Gates - but very good nonetheless; the best I could find, at any rate. And you can of course wood-mod them, which will greatly enhance the sound. For bypassing, I would simply go for the best film cap that meets your size / budget constraints, the same for output caps. Your current choices are ok for their price. Also, it is not on the new schematic, but you could try installing a 10nF cap at the DAC input. With most caps, this will degrade dynamics and colour the sound; however the best ones might actually be an improvement. I'm talking Jupiter Beeswax / V-Cap / Duelund sort of quality (or my hand-made caps! ).
__________________
Studio Zèy - natural, hand-crafted components for hi-end audio. "Dare to be different, and you may stumble upon something amazing." |
||
|
|
|
#222 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
I expected to kind of impair Peter's Dac with these 'inferior' caps. Big surprise. To my ear sound opened up. More bass better controlled and a bit of a veil removed across the board. Peter's Dac eventually migrated out of the picture and was replaced fully by the WaveIO as a USB to I2S converter. This is just in a different league altogether. Point of this is there are cap choices that can work very well. I am guessing that the pcm2706 really mates well with the Oscon SEP and most anything in the first stage of the crc will suffice. |
|
|
|
|
#223 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
The audio world is f***** without blackgates...
Hm, but what more do you need for USB? |
|
|
|
#224 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Czyżeminek, near Łódź
|
Quote:
@wlowes - which version of NOS DAC you were using? I have not heard any TDA1541-based DAC, that would match Peter's latest version for naturalness and raw energy, so I'm kinda curious what pushed you towards 1541?...
__________________
Studio Zèy - natural, hand-crafted components for hi-end audio. "Dare to be different, and you may stumble upon something amazing." |
|
|
|
|
#225 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Quote:
It is to my ear pretty good. I evolved in this direction prior to the revised approach to 1543 described by this thread. It may well be better than my 1541a. No question however, my 1541a driven by Peter's I2S segment was much better in naturalness than Peter's original....the WaveIO took it into another realm. I expect you and Peter have created something awesome, but I have no opportunity to compare as I have not built it. At this stage for me the 1541a mystique has grabbed me, and I am happy with the audio result. I continue to watch this thread as I can imagine building this one day for an alternate experience. |
||
|
|
|
#226 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Czyżeminek, near Łódź
|
The new version is really quite something, I heartily recommend trying it - especially that it is so brilliantly simple. But it was Peter and Bobken who developed it, I merely played around with different part substitutions within their schematic.
__________________
Studio Zèy - natural, hand-crafted components for hi-end audio. "Dare to be different, and you may stumble upon something amazing." |
|
|
|
#227 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
|
last design, to what post are you referring it?
One other question, with the balanced version and using a balanced amp (a circlotron) any advice on how to achieve the volume control? a balanced double pot per channel? |
|
|
|
#228 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: London, Ontario
|
I have one of those MUSE 1543x 4 DACS that uses the DIR9001 receiver chip. The specifications claim 50pSec jitter for the DIR9001 and 200pSec for the CS8412.
I am planning on building my own DAC and have read that NOS DAC's are less critical of jitter. Has anyone tried both receivers or know of any sonic differences in using either one? |
|
|
|
#229 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hangzhou - Marco Polo's 'most beautiful city'. 700yrs is a long time though...
Blog Entries: 62
|
I listen to NOS DACs and so far I couldn't be sure I've heard any differences - have tried DIR9001, CS8414 and WM8805. I haven't found jitter to be an audible problem so far. There are guys over on HeadFi who say they prefer one receiver chip to another in Audio-gd's DACs.
__________________
When a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure. C.A.E. Goodhart |
|
|
|
#230 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
If I understand this new build it is just under the premise that better power is the only thing the 1543 needs... Then some DC coupling output, correct?
Is the improved power about regulation, or noise rejection? I haven't been under the impression that power regulation improves sound as much as noise rejection, yet. |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FS: NOS TDA1543 DAC | 2A3SET | Swap Meet | 0 | 24th March 2011 07:10 PM |
| Pushing Aleph P to limits - Passive Tri-amp | Alves | Pass Labs | 4 | 12th September 2006 01:56 AM |
| TDA1543 and CS8412 NOS DAC | Igla | Digital Source | 3 | 7th March 2006 07:27 PM |
| Nos Tda1543 Dac. | IpsilonSound | Digital Source | 0 | 4th June 2004 06:25 PM |
| TDA1543 nos dac question... | setmenu | Digital Source | 13 | 2nd June 2004 12:03 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |