
Home  Forums  Rules  Articles  diyAudio Store  Gallery  Wiki  Blogs  Register  Donations  FAQ  Calendar  Search  Today's Posts  Mark Forums Read  Search 
Audio Sector Kits & PC boards from AudioSector 

Thread Tools  Search this Thread 
20th December 2013, 11:01 PM  #451 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Toronto

The parts arrived, so I put them in immediately.
R4 = 275K ( 249K caddock + 1% metal film (mistake ordering)) was 330K C2 = 0.0056 uF Relcap RTE (was 0.01) C3 = 47uF Elna RBD Results are terrific even without break in! Of course, since R4 is now below 300K a Vishay nude can also be installed. A Russian teflon is on the way for the Relcap. 
20th December 2013, 11:57 PM  #452 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Poznań

I'm not surprised.
You made 103.35Hz instead of 50Hz ... 5.6n + 33k gives you 861.23 Hz instead of 500Hz ... You have to change all values in riaa not part of it. Changing big R in second stage you also changing the gain (lower R lower gain). 
21st December 2013, 06:04 AM  #453 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Toronto

But the point of this is that given the design of a current to voltage convertor followed by a difference amp is not hard to model. The equations are closed form solutions. So is Riaa. Then, just take the results of the model, normalize to 1k, subtract normalized Riaa values, and square these errors.
This yields a sum of squared errors of 258 for the original design. The above changes lower the sum of squares of the errors to 12.5. I would think the changed implementation would be closer to Riaa regardless of whether or not specific time constants are met. Using. 250K r4 gives an even closer sum of squared error = 8.34. How can this be a bad thing? 
28th December 2013, 03:11 AM  #454 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Toronto

After setting up the LTspice simulation, I have to agree.... the spreadsheet looks quite wrong..... I used an LT1677 for the op amp. Similar slew rate to the OP27.

28th December 2013, 04:08 AM  #455 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Toronto

I found the error in my spreadsheet.
With my values, the sum of squares error is 145. With the stock values, it is 1.9. With R1=1K596 it is 1.87. The circuit values are correct and cannot be improved in any significant way. R4 to 300K gives sum of squared error of 0.58! 310k gives 0.41!!! Last edited by BigE; 28th December 2013 at 04:20 AM. 
8th January 2014, 06:56 PM  #456 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Toronto

The 0.01 cap is back in place... much better. 0.0056 sounded like hitting the "loudness" button.
According to my spreadsheet, 0.0098uF gives minimal error ( +/ 0.1 db from RIAA), but this is very close as well. R4 is 300k, with no other changes from stock BOM values. 
14th January 2014, 02:26 AM  #457 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Toronto

After playing around, the best values I could generate from the spreadsheet were:
C3=10uF R4=300000 R5 = 32600 ( 32570 == 33000  2M5 ) C2 = 0.0099uF This is very very close to RIAA. Important frequencies are within 0.05db,with frequency extremes being 0.08db out. This has not been tested.... parts are coming to try to build up the 0.0099 uF cap. The change of R4 and R5 will get closer... the 2M5 resistors are also on the way., 
15th February 2014, 07:16 PM  #458 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2011

Can this phono stage be built in a balanced configuration? I was looking at the aqvox at first but I found this and it seems to be the more affordable alternative, I just don't know about the balanced option.

19th February 2014, 01:19 PM  #459 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Bucharest

I have a Hi output MC Denon DL110. Can it be used with this phono pre ?

5th May 2014, 02:33 AM  #460 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Toronto

Yes.
Final values implemented: All stock except: R4 @ 300K (was 330K), C2 @ 09.8 nF (was 10 nf) and C3 @ 47 uF (was 10 uF) Caps are now breaking in (FT2 teflon). 
Thread Tools  Search this Thread 


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
NS10 phono stage  ponger  Pass Labs  9  28th March 2011 09:57 AM 
DIY phono to replace roksan phono stage  seroxatmad  Analog Line Level  6  14th December 2008 06:46 PM 
new phono stage or old preamp with phono?  flohmann  Analog Line Level  2  2nd October 2008 10:51 PM 
phono stage  east electronics  Tubes / Valves  20  24th March 2008 09:22 AM 
Should I replace Scott 222C phono stage with Claret phono stage?  Bing Yang  Analogue Source  0  22nd August 2005 07:41 AM 
New To Site?  Need Help? 