|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Analogue Source Turntables, Tonearms, Cartridges, Phono Stages, Tuners, Tape Recorders, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#11 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Portland, Or
|
I haven't been here in a long time. I came back to do some reasearch on vacuum hold-down and found this thread first. I also have been considering adding magnets just as you did, to lighten my platter, which is 30 lbs.
Congrats on a great looking job! |
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: israel
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: North Californie
|
... consider a Bismuth /Magnesium & Zinc layered platter next time = a superconductor at about 120 degrees K when activated with a small electrostatic charge (according to Los Alamos Nat. labs).
Then it would be really cool ...
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: minimalopolis
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: israel
|
I quit the magnetic bearing route eventually.
I struggled to minimize magnetic flux on the platter surface, especially in vicinity of the bearing axle (inner grooves). In spite of the fact that magnetic field seems to have no audible effect on the cart, I was still a bit worried about long term consequences. The stanless steel shaft which appeared to be ferromagnetic, was replaced to non-magnetic SS alloy with little effect. The only thing left to try was Mu-metal magnetic shielding, means major re-design of the bearing and platter, not to mention money/time expence. The main driver behind the mag bearing was the scaring weight of my platter: 35 kg total! I though it is impossible to bear such weight with conventional ball-thrust plate design. I was wrong! Now I end up with 1/2 inch steel ball running on the delrin thrust plate. Large ball increases the contact area and reduces stess. Another essentinal component is the low viscosity Van-den-Hul bearing oil; any other oil I've tried slowed down the platter too much. Following three weeks of spinning, I disassembled the bering. There was a dimple 1 mm deep in the delrin - not a big deal! The most important, sonically I did not noticed any deterioration, comparing to both fully suspended and partially supported by magnets platter. Quite the opposite - with a fully suspended platter I could not get rid of feeling somehow "springy" bass, quick but lack of authority and proper decay. Subjectively, conventional bearing has more relaxed, full-bodied sound, I was always after. So, why bother with magnets? I want to say my TT in its recent state leaves very little to desire for me, especially after I switched to wonderfull Sumiko Celebration cart, which appeared to be very good match to my linear tracker. |
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: SoCal
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| maggie PIN specs?? | bear | Planars & Exotics | 6 | 11th April 2008 04:10 PM |
| Modding Maggie SMG's | Glowbug | Planars & Exotics | 1 | 7th February 2008 04:51 AM |
| Finishing my Maggie Rebuild | alexmoose | Planars & Exotics | 1 | 9th May 2007 09:18 PM |
| Maggie 1.6 Ohm Reading | amkazen | Planars & Exotics | 2 | 15th December 2005 02:47 PM |
| Gabevee's Maggie (MAG1515) | percy | Tubes / Valves | 2 | 14th September 2004 11:43 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08859 seconds (81.78% PHP - 18.22% MySQL) with 11 queries |