|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Analogue Source Turntables, Tonearms, Cartridges, Phono Stages, Tuners, Tape Recorders, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I'd like to find a method to separately measure horizontal and vertical resonance of a tonearm.
If I could just go out and buy the right equipment to do this, what would it be? That probably won't be possible, so is there something I can make that will let me measure it? My understanding is that the horizontal and vertical resonant frequencies need to be different, but I don't understand why. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Hi,
A test record with suitable tracks for determining such things. There is no reason why the frequencies have to be different, for most arms they are the same. Generally speaking though why do you need to measure it ? Usually just a question of sensible cartridge compliance choice. /sreten.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Shilton
|
Its actually relatively simple using a test record - you just measure the cart output voltage - it will peak at resonance, and if you measure the output after the phono stage, it will remove the equalisation from the equation too.
Oddly though in the main, the resonances are usually measured using a mechanical 'exciter' (usually a solenoid coil), but by measuring the stage output, you could actually be getting a better insight into the arm/cart behaviour. Just a thought Owen |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
|
Track 15 on Test record QR2010.
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Owen,
Quote:
Do you have any more details on this exciter thingy? Would it be hard to make one? |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Near London. UK
|
There are test records with subsonic sweeps recorded specifically for finding the arm/cartridge resonance. You just watch the vertical bahaviour of the arm, and when it tries to take off, you note the time from the beginning of the track and calculate the excitation frequency.
__________________
The loudspeaker: The only commercial Hi-Fi item where a disproportionate part of the budget isn't spent on the box. And the one where it would make a difference... |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Geelong
|
What do you actually want to measure? The resonant frequency doesn't tell you much about the arm unless you know the exact compliance of the cartridge.
It sounds to me like you actually want to measure the vertical and horizontal moments of inertia of the arm, which allow one to calculate the "equivalent mass" ( Icm / length^2, where length is effective arm length). The equivalent mass then gives the resonant frequency for a given cartridge compliance from the usual formula for simple harmonic motion. The moment of inertia of the arm is reasonably easy to measure directly using a torsion pendulum. I made one out of a small stainless steel ruler and used a stainless rod as a calibration weight. Torsion pendulum |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Mark,
this looks like what I'm after. If I understand correctly, to take a measurement, you displace the load in such a way that the ruler twists along its long axis. It then oscillates, and you count the oscillations. So, if I wanted to separate horizontal and vertical components, I would make the measurement twice, repositioning the clamp. Is that correct? Neil |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Geelong
|
Sounds good to me.
Caveat:I only used this to do a horizontal Icm, vertical seemed a little trickier (more things to avoid). |
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Enclosure resonances, not a big deal? | thadman | Multi-Way | 167 | 29th May 2009 07:18 PM |
| Pipe resonances. | perpetual | Subwoofers | 22 | 12th June 2005 05:44 PM |
| Room resonances | Positron | Tubes / Valves | 28 | 12th December 2003 03:27 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10068 seconds (79.50% PHP - 20.50% MySQL) with 10 queries |