|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Analogue Source Turntables, Tonearms, Cartridges, Phono Stages, Tuners, Tape Recorders, etc. |
|
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Lincolnshire, UK
|
OK, I am going with a Premotec synchronous motor for my DIY Idler drive project. With my chosen motor, here (35104 or 35504) I have a choice between 24 or 220 volt operation, (these are the only ones stocked by the UK distributor, all others are dependant upon a minimum order number)
Specifications seem to be the same for both voltages so which one do you think I should go for? I,m thinking perhaps the 24 volt would be less likely to upset the cartridge, or wont it matter? Paul. |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Geelong
|
Don't use either.
Synchronous motors are very difficult to handle in idler drive applications because a synchronous motor has no torque reserve the way a DC or induction motor does. To see what I mean by this look at the torque curves on the attached web page - you will see that both the induction motor and the DC motor will provide significantly higher than their rated torque during the run - up. A synch motor does not do this, it starts at full speed and if that requires more than its rated torque then it doesn't start at all. If you use a motor with enough torque to start it will cause a lot of stress on the idler mechanism as it jumps to speed in a matter of milliseconds. I use a three phase EC motor (basically an advanced version of a synch motor) in my 301 and I had to change the drive electronics so it started at half speed then went to full speed to reduce this problem. Turntable Motors |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Lincolnshire, UK
|
Mark, thanks for the info and I found your site very interesting.
I see what you mean, I think! My biggest problem is that I have no knowledge or expertise in designing or building electronic circuits, that is the reason that I wanted to go the synchronous motor route. Also the design I have in mind probably goes against the popular norm for TT design. I am going to build an Idler drive, but without the idler wheel. The motor will be pivoted and drive a sub platter directly. If the idea looks like working I will take the design further and decouple the main platter from the sub platter. I anticipate much tinkering and tweeking so i cant afford to spend large amounts of money on it at this momment. Is the main problem going to be one of sudden take up of the drive train? If so I have an idea how to get round that. As I am not going for a high mass platter I doubt the motor will stall.... |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Help required for using a FDD motor as a turntable motor. | binspaul | Analogue Source | 5 | 13th May 2009 03:59 AM |
| Lambda motor vs. XBL^2 motor vs. any other motor | Thinkcat | Subwoofers | 16 | 23rd December 2008 06:23 AM |
| DIY TT: motor, motor PS, platter speed measurements | dice45 | Analogue Source | 52 | 9th May 2006 01:07 PM |
| Rail Voltage to Capacitor Voltage | Mermprin | Parts | 6 | 20th September 2004 03:56 PM |
| Rail voltage compared to transformer voltage | SteveG | Solid State | 4 | 22nd July 2002 11:50 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |