|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Analogue Source Turntables, Tonearms, Cartridges, Phono Stages, Tuners, Tape Recorders, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Calgary, Alberta
|
I was trying to find a "best" RIAA eq for my preamp in this thread: Would this work (simple OPA1632 phono preamp)? and the Doug Self circuit from 1996 is mentioned often. In Rod Elliott's Project 25 http://sound.westhost.com/project25.htm he does show a schematic and points out that 1 cap is likely the wrong value and if you change it you do get the 3180 us constant. However I found another project http://www.mhennessy.f9.co.uk/preamp/schematics.htm (click Phono stage schematic) where the designer also claims to use the Self eq but has other components with different values. Does anyone have the original Self article or know enough about the subject to verify what is correct?
__________________
Aerodynamics are for people who can't build engines. Enzo Ferrari |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
you might want to read Nelson Pass' article on the Pearl (I believe that's the one) -- www.passdiy.com
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
I think 'cos it's still available from http://www.softcopy.co.uk/mag/defaul...070540&count=1 (watch out, this adds it to a 'shopping basket') for 4 pounds, it might not be readily available on the net.
As it's not on his own site (http://www.dself.dsl.pipex.com/ampins/ampins.htm) you might end up having to get a copy for yourself to verify what is correct.
__________________
Jont. "It is impossible to build a fool proof system; because fools are so ingenious." |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: n
|
I'm prepared to be wrong on this but I think the mhennesey value
for the big resistor isa conseqence of misreading the schematic in 'Self on Audio'. I think 5220 Ohms in parallel with 14.32n and 63500 in parallel with 50n gives the right numbers. Paul |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Hi,
I have the book at home so I can check tonight. However D.Self categorically states that the time constants interact and you cannot get accurate EQ by using the time constants for each section. Consequently for the proper values a simple R||C time constant calculation should yield "incorrect" time constants. /sreten.
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
|
If I remember I'll check his book when I get home.
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Kuala Lumpur
|
I have one of Doug Selfs Wireless World design articles at work and can check tomorrow.
The best thing is to use a simulator like Simetrix and simulate against the ideal mathematical model. It's quite easy to get very close to ideal. I have seen a few discrete preamps that are off at the 3180us point because they run out of gain |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: virginia
|
I recall an article by Reg Williamson in Audio Amateur about 15 years ago on this subject. He had 4 different topologies for the RIAA network and the correct time constants for each topology to provide the proper RIAA break frequencies.
Finding the article may take some time. Regards, Ray |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: ..
|
you might want to look at jung's Op Amp Applications book
section 6 has a dozen pages on riaa circuits http://www.analog.com/library/analog..._handbook.html |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Kuala Lumpur
|
Doug Selfs Wireless World February 1979 RIAA preamp
This was a single supply bipolar transistor design. I have modeled it here with opamps for simplicity but the results are similar. Note that the gain is low from 50Hz to 1KHz, as much as 1.6dB so the 3180 us pole is wrong. |
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Looking for Transistor based Gyrator info. Any "Wireless World" collectors out there? | Hearinspace | Everything Else | 24 | 19th February 2011 07:58 PM |
| Wireless World article | yves | Solid State | 31 | 3rd October 2010 08:57 PM |
| RIAA: what does it stand for? | jarthel | Tubes / Valves | 2 | 4th September 2006 06:54 AM |
| USB RIAA in Electronics World | jackinnj | Solid State | 0 | 24th December 2002 01:21 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11491 seconds (71.90% PHP - 28.10% MySQL) with 11 queries |