|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Analogue Source Turntables, Tonearms, Cartridges, Phono Stages, Tuners, Tape Recorders, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I have seen turntables with a bearing ball pressd on the spindle riding on a delrin or teflon thrust plate.
Anyone have any experience using a second bearing ball in place of derlin or teflon thrust plate? thanks! bob |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
you may find the teflon helps damp the bearing...might help stop bearing noise
might be worth a go tho altough watch out for: useing a ball bearing might lift the hieght of the platter if its thicker than the origonal teflon plate.... and finally the 2 ballbearings might have a tendancy to want to wobble if the 2 centers are not exactly kept true best wishes j7
__________________
www.audioorigami.co.uk |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Long Island, New York
|
AudioOrigami,
I could have sworn I saw on your website somewhere that you were working on a turntable main bearing. Was I just dreaming or is it true? If it is true how is it coming?
__________________
----------------------------------------------- Kilowattski |
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
hi its on my web site www.audioorigami.co.uk ...in the floppy project ...part 3 there is a thread in here on DIY as well best wishes j7
__________________
www.audioorigami.co.uk |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Portland, Or
|
If the platter is heavy, you're talking about humongous PSI. For my 30 lb. platter, the PSI was over 4 million! I was considering two ceramic balls- they would have shattered or ground each other flat. I'm using ceramic ball/delrin plate now and it is fine. The divot made in the plastic is very small.
Wobble is also a real concern, as already mentioned. Colby |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Michigan
|
Back in the mid-80's when I was turntable shopping, the Linn LP-12 folks harped about any lack of rigidity causing loss of small details.
The LP-12 bearing is machined onto the end of the spindle and rides on a metal thrust plate...no play between the end of a spindle and a bearing. They claimed it was one of the most important design issues in the LP-12 design. I think the lower-priced Axis did something different but I can't remember what. Anyway, I don't see the benefit of two moving parts under the platter spindle. If the pressure is as great as a previous poster calculated, what might have seemed to be trivial, miniscule or dismissable issues may contribute to 'problems', audible or otherwise. Sphericity of a bearing can only be 'so good'. Who knows what happens when you put two together and they randomly interact as they rotate under high pressure? I see two reasons so far to keep it simple...I'd stick with one bearing at most. Murray
__________________
Murray |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Thank you for all of the replies.
I knew that the Yorke turntable used a 2 bearing set-up, with no abnormal wear issues and it produces world class sound. I know that there are a number of grades of finish on ball bearings and assuming everything was machined correctly, a high grade ball bearing set-up would produce less friction than a set-up with a single ball and a teflon-type thrust bearing. I may prototype a daul ball bearing set up and report back to the forum.... |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
coolness
__________________
www.audioorigami.co.uk |
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Musicville
|
Quote:
I do not remember seeing a dual ball bearing setup though. I don't see how it could be a good thing since the bearing axle alone rotates. The ball bearing is fixed and does not turn. THe thrust plate is simply there to dampen energy and support the bearing ball. Introducing another ball would only make things more complicated than they need to be, IMO. AudioOrigami already stated the eccentricity issue to think about. |
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| TT motor spindle source | BobM | Analogue Source | 2 | 8th May 2009 02:36 PM |
| Turntable spindle sizes | Alter Ego | Analogue Source | 6 | 19th April 2009 03:18 AM |
| Air Bearing Spindle DD Turntable | monsieurphot | Analogue Source | 18 | 12th April 2008 07:05 AM |
| spindle bearing | bob38138 | Analogue Source | 9 | 29th March 2008 01:11 AM |
| Ferro-fluid, active bearing, floating spindle | redrabbit | Analogue Source | 10 | 20th October 2007 01:11 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.12531 seconds (65.56% PHP - 34.44% MySQL) with 11 queries |