|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Analogue Source Turntables, Tonearms, Cartridges, Phono Stages, Tuners, Tape Recorders, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#31 | |
|
Previously: Kuei Yang Wang
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Somewhere nice on planet earth
|
Konnichiwa,
Quote:
Sayonara |
|
|
|
|
#32 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Central NY
|
Quote:
Maybe it could be done this way: start with two pumps (A and B) and a box. Route the output of pump A into the box. Enclose pump B inside of the box (except for the power cord, of course). Have the output of pump B exit the box and supply the pressure to the tank. The box, of course, needs to be airtight. If you wanted to double the pressure, that might be worth trying. But I don't think I'd bother as an approach to get 20 or more psi. I think an airbrush or dental compressor would be better. But those aren't exactly cheap, though you could find an airbrush compressor used. What we need is a pneumatics engineer. There must be a way to convert high airflow/low pressure into high pressure/low airflow. Such a person could probably solve my problem of the side forces as well. Paul |
|
|
|
|
#33 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: israel
|
Quote:
Paul, there is nothing complicated about your side force origin. From the picture below, you'll see the slider is looking for equilibrum at some angle relatively to the bearing axle, while moving away from the bearig center, just beacause of the distance between its center of gravity (CG) and center of pressure applied by the bearing. So, projecting the slider weight vector on its axle, you have the side componet of the slider weight, which is driving crazy your arm. This is unstable system: the further slider moves away from the bearing center, the more side force is. Of cource, the angular deviation is rather small, but because you slider is so heavy, the side force becomes substantial enough, to bother you. From my experience, air tracking arm reacts histerically on any side force, and shall be perfectly levelled and balanced. That's why I'm saying the only way to build good high pressure/stiffness air arm is to make lightweight symmetrical slider/bearing/arm assembly and leave heavy shaft fixed firmly on its place. As for air pump performance, typical pressure vs. flow chart shows, the more airflow you need, the less pressue you get. Any air pump is designed for specific pressure/flow characteristics. Looking through those currently proposed on ebay, I got an impression, the good air brush compressor performance suits well air tracker needs, providing typically 30-60 psi pressure and sufficient air flow. I now nothing about how loud are they, but some claimed to be very silent... |
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Singapore
|
according to this stereophile review, kuzma uses the sil air technology compressors.
a google on the web revealed that Silent Aire produces these compressors. they have a supersilent model... comparisons of noise levels shown below:
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: israel
|
There is one currently on eBay:
http://cgi.ebay.com/Air-Brush-Compre...QQcmdZViewItem |
|
|
|
#36 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Central NY
|
Quote:
Quote:
My compressor is rated at 43 dB. It is OK when I put it in the basement except for when it reaches its maximum pressure setting. It then has some sort of release that causes a loud hissing that must be much higher than 43 dB. If the pump ran continuously it would probably be acceptable. I wonder if the airbrush pumps have such a release valve. |
||
|
|
|
#37 | |||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Amsterdam
|
Quote:
Quote:
(Kuzma state in the manual their the arm needs about 4 bar at 4 liters of air per minute). Quote:
__________________
Keep an open mind. It helps. Peter |
|||
|
|
|
#38 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: israel
|
Quote:
http://www.efunda.com/formulae/fluid..._flowmeter.cfm Just calculate your air gap area and put the equivalent circular hole diameter into calculation - this shall give you reasonably good approximation (fluid density and flow coefficient are already set for air). |
|
|
|
|
#39 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Amsterdam
|
Quote:
It seems to be what I was looking for. (too bad you can only use it a few times before it shuts you out, but I found it will work again next day)
__________________
Keep an open mind. It helps. Peter |
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Ladegaard Arm Air Requirements ? | valveitude | Analogue Source | 10 | 1st February 2007 08:06 AM |
| wow! ladegaard success. | graeme uk | Analogue Source | 25 | 22nd January 2007 06:01 PM |
| a couple of q's about ladegaard arm | graeme uk | Analogue Source | 9 | 11th January 2007 09:58 AM |
| Ladegaard | peterr | Analogue Source | 57 | 20th April 2005 02:26 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.19224 seconds (55.14% PHP - 44.86% MySQL) with 11 queries |