|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Analogue Source Turntables, Tonearms, Cartridges, Phono Stages, Tuners, Tape Recorders, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2003
|
Why is it that a cartridge starts shaking/trembling in the direction shown on the picture? (Lateral, is this the word?)
It’s worse on the outside of the record, an diminishes rapidly after say two minutes of the first song. /Hugo |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Sofia
|
How old is the cart? Maybe just Parkinson?
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Anione now a data sheet for SUPEX SDX1000 Phone cartrige
Thanks Cici |
|
|
|
#5 | ||
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2003
|
Quote:
I guess something’s wrong with the cartridge, it behaves the same on two complete different turntables. A TD124 with SME3012 and a Technics SL1210. Quote:
I had to return the first stylus because the azimuth was way out of spec. Now the second one is slightly off center as you can see on the picture. Although the vendor was so kind to order four of the same styli, all of them were in some way not perfectly build. We picked the best one out. It's a Stanton 881 MKII. /Hugo |
||
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Belgium
|
Unless I am mistaken the Stanton has a very high compliance, while the Technics arm, and certainly the SME, has a high effective mass.
Together these yield a low resonance frequency, probably below 8Hz, which is then easily excited by small horizonal irregularities in the LP. In other words, a complete miss-match. EDIT: the 881's compliance of 30um/mN, mass of 6g, and a 12g arm would give < 7Hz. Disaster ... return it and get a more suitable cartridge with much lower compliance. |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2003
|
Werner,
Thanks a lot for that. I believe your calculations matches mine, as I did some reading and came up with 6.7Hz. Tonearm mass 14g + cartridge mass 5.5g. I can't figure out however that in the early days the shure V15 was a seemingly perfect match for the SME. SME Headshells had the Shure label on it. ![]() When looking at the mass of the V15VxMR (recently discontinued!!) http://www.shure.com/phono/catphono_hifi.html we got even worse figures. Of course the early shures could have had a lower mass to fit the arm. /Hugo
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Did it Himself
diyAudio Member
|
I had this problem before with a couple of decks and different carts. I thought it was bed recordings with subsonic garbage present. I guessed this excites the resonance of the cart/arm interface.
I changed to an Ortofon cart on one deck and with the same records the problem reduced but did not go away. One one deck the shaking was so bad that skipping occured.
__________________
www.readresearch.co.uk my website for UK diy audio people - designs, PCBs, kits and more |
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| tweaks for an old cartridge | Zero One | Analogue Source | 9 | 7th September 2006 09:18 PM |
| DIY Cartridge? | dnsey | Analogue Source | 22 | 6th August 2006 05:59 PM |
| Speakers to match t-amp with room shaking capabilites possible? | zester | Multi-Way | 0 | 11th May 2006 11:12 AM |
| a new cartridge.... | marcanto | Analogue Source | 2 | 29th September 2005 07:24 AM |
| EMT TSD-15 cartridge | tgroendahl | Analogue Source | 0 | 8th May 2005 12:52 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10263 seconds (76.21% PHP - 23.79% MySQL) with 11 queries |