|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Analogue Source Turntables, Tonearms, Cartridges, Phono Stages, Tuners, Tape Recorders, etc. |
|
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Helsinki.
|
Hi all!
I found recently a couple of passive preamp projects using 10kohm DACT CT2 stepped attenuator. Both of those seemed to be very successfull and got me interested. Now I'd like to hear comments about good/bad sides of passive preamplification and especially if someone has experience with DACT CT2. I know that passive preamp is a lossy device but it's sooo much more simpler to make by a newbie like me than any solid state version that it might compensate for the lossiness... I hope you can help me with this one, I really appreciate all the comments. Cheers, Mikko |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: London UK
|
I know that passive preamp is a lossy device but it's sooo much more simpler to make by a newbie like me than any solid state version that it might compensate for the lossiness...
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------They are fine if you have input impedance of 50 kOhm at the amp. The DAXCT I find to have too few steps. Ideally this should be 60 or so to set the right volume. Don't use too long a cable, 1.5m low capacitan is fine.
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: U.K.
|
For such a simple thing, there are a surprising number of things to get right for it to work well. Here are some that I consider the most important:
* There should be sufficient system gain. * It's impedance should be high compared with the source impedance. * It's impedance should be low compared with the load impedance. * The cables to and from, should be short. |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Helsinki.
|
Oookay, I guess the only problem will be the power amps imput impedance. I'll have to think about that issue...
Thanks for the info everyone. |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Belgium
|
Hi,
If you don't need any gain, have the attenuator followed by a buffer stage. That should take care of the Zout, will drive relatively long and capacitive cable and interface much better with both the source and the Zin of the amplifier. The DACT are series type devices using a 24 step Elma switch. There are better ways of doing this as in the case of the DACT you'll always have a number of resistors in series at most positions of the attenuator. For inspiration on alternative ways check the Goldpoint site at: GOLDPOINT Cheers,
__________________
Frank |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| F1 and a passive preamp? | roscoeiii | Pass Labs | 10 | 10th May 2009 12:55 AM |
| Want a passive Preamp | hkfind | Swap Meet | 0 | 5th January 2006 07:07 AM |
| Passive Preamp | Rarkov | Analogue Source | 77 | 15th April 2003 06:51 PM |
| Passive preamp | Flemming J P | Everything Else | 7 | 5th November 2001 09:40 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |