Go Back   Home > Forums > Source & Line > Analogue Source
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Analogue Source Turntables, Tonearms, Cartridges, Phono Stages, Tuners, Tape Recorders, etc.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 14th January 2010, 02:26 PM   #31
Previously: Kuei Yang Wang
 
ThorstenL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Somewhere nice on planet earth
Hi,

Quote:
Originally Posted by Onvinyl View Post
I don't get where the other end of the 1Meg resistor goes. One of the supplies?
Okay, simple.

Feedback Loop = 316K//10n & 36K, 750R to the collector of Q1 from negative input of U1.

CCS from Q1 Collector to ground or negative supply.

Resistor 1M from the collector of Q1 to the positive input of U1.

Capacitor 1uF or larger (high quality) to ground from positive input of U1.

This does not eliminate the offset of U1 of course, but offset should be minimised and it will track any thermal shift in the input folded cascode. The Offset of U1 can then be easily trimmed off or you can use a 2nd order Servo with a very high value resistor into the inverting input of U1 minimising the sonic impact.

Ciao T
__________________
Freedom is always the freedom of those who express ideas and views that YOU disagree with.
  Reply With Quote
Old 14th January 2010, 05:07 PM   #32
diyAudio Member
 
Onvinyl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Germany
Thanks Thorsten.

Fiddling with it in a simulator indicates it might not be that easy to make it working. I will try on the bench.

However, your first answer indeed backs up my feeling that the input stage deserves something (more) decent as a following stage than 1 opamp.

Rüdiger
__________________
"I can feel what's going on inside a piece of electronic equipment. I have a sense that I know what's going on inside the transistors." Robert Moog
  Reply With Quote
Old 14th January 2010, 05:46 PM   #33
Previously: Kuei Yang Wang
 
ThorstenL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Somewhere nice on planet earth
Hi,

Quote:
Originally Posted by Onvinyl View Post
Fiddling with it in a simulator indicates it might not be that easy to make it working. I will try on the bench.
A Fet Input Op-Amp may help...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Onvinyl View Post
However, your first answer indeed backs up my feeling that the input stage deserves something (more) decent as a following stage than 1 opamp.
Well, I have a "near other commercial stuff" comparison Phono a design with an INA103 set up as Howland current pump (so it effectively behaves as transconductance cell (so it behaves a lot like a folded cascode).

The second stage set up as inverting Op-Amp with suitable input impedance and feedback network to affect the HF timeconstant with a cap to ground and the input resistor, plus the LF timeconstants in the feedback loop.

OPA is of course the OPA637.

No Servos.

No Coupling Caps. Hand trimmed offset using Vishay trimmers.

All Rhopoint wirewound copper alloy resistors for the critical stuff and mil spec east german made polystyrene caps (1985 vintage) for the EQ.

Massively overbuild unregulated supply, using four 50VA transformers with full wave schottky rectifiers and 10 pcs 10,000uF Caps in RCRC...RC filters per voltage.
Seperate 10R resistors and 80uF/35V Film Caps for each Op-Amp with some additional SMD Film Caps for decoupling.

This phono stage was in part inspired by the Emitter and the Vendetta plus some twists of my own.

Two section chassis, non-magnetic & copperclad in the audio section.

It takes some very SERIOUS phono-pre to better this little "illustration of a good commercial Phono".

So far not much commercial, solid state or hollow state did much better (except some extreme tubes stuff).

So, that "better than one op-amp" may take some doing.

The Phonostage that was designed with this one (and many others) as reference is not entierly inexpensive and was the one I referenced above.

Ciao T
__________________
Freedom is always the freedom of those who express ideas and views that YOU disagree with.
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th January 2010, 11:22 AM   #34
diyAudio Member
 
Onvinyl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Germany
Thorsten, for sure I did not want to sound pretentious. I you get great results with that opamp-stage this is good news to me, and I will try to get there.

Rüdiger
__________________
"I can feel what's going on inside a piece of electronic equipment. I have a sense that I know what's going on inside the transistors." Robert Moog
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
folded cascode the_tool Chip Amps 1 27th June 2006 10:53 PM
Folded Cascode Sound? wrenchone Solid State 16 26th February 2004 06:56 AM
folded cascode puzzling drakonis Pass Labs 6 30th March 2002 10:04 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 07:27 PM.

Page generated in 0.16710 seconds (63.26% PHP - 36.74% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio