|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Analogue Source Turntables, Tonearms, Cartridges, Phono Stages, Tuners, Tape Recorders, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#11 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Athens
|
Thanks Werner,
My cartridge is a 3mV VDH MC-Two, and with a similar first stage topology ( Thorstenized Pacific.... sk117) sounded ok to me. Could I use the 117s (BL 5ma IDSS..) I have on hand instead of 369 ? For a total gain around 40db could you please advice me component values for the 627 ?
__________________
Marinos |
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Belgium
|
I wouldn't call a cascoded Pacific 'similar' to the above circuit. As seen from the point of view of the power supply they are quite massively different. And the same holds for the voltage seen by the input FETs drain.
I only use 2sk170 and 2sk369. These are the only JFETs I have, no experience with the 117. I can't give values for 40dB, as the whole network around the opamp must be carefully simulated for the intended frequency response, preferrably with the actual measured component values of the Cs in place. |
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Athens
|
Sorry Werner,
My mistake, read 2SK170 instead of 117. Quote:
How about using 2SK170 instead of 2SK369? From another thread "...the 2SK170 @ 5mA has around 30mS (30mA/V) transconductance.." a bit lower than than 2sk369. That means lower gain. Correct ?
__________________
Marinos |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Belgium
|
Correct. And you can also degenerate it by inserting a resistor between source and ground. Not ideal for noise, but who cares with a 3mV cartridge?
Bu why don't you download a simulator and try optmising the circuit yourself? As I stated in the original post, the values in the schematic are indicative only. In other words: they are NOT the real thing. But close. http://www.catena.uk.com/Pages/download.html |
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: As far from the NOSsers as possible
|
Right, forget arguing about noise and sonics...etc.
Think RF. Stick with FETs. Jocko |
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: SF Bay Area
|
Werner:
I just came across this thread, and was surprised because I have just finished building a phono preamp with a very similar topology. Folded-cascode front end using 2SK146 pairs in parallel, with the first RIAA pole (plus the HF correction) implemented at the output of this stage. Feeds an AD797 that has the 50Hz and 500Hz corrections in the feedback loop. No caps in the signal path other than the RIAA caps, because I use a servo to control the DC output by adjusting the voltage at the lower end of the resistor that represents the ouput of the cascode stage. Anyway, the results are as you described -- super quiet, and it sounds magnificent. Distortion is almost entirely 2nd at around -70dB, a little 3rd as the level comes up, and no higher harmonics I can see down to about -100dB. Peter |
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Previously: Kuei Yang Wang
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Somewhere nice on planet earth
|
Konnichiwa,
Quote:
Here maybe a hint (you might know the source of this).... First, the whole circuit inverts polarity. What you could do is to scale the 3180/318uS part of the RIAA a little, so that you end up with 68K//47n & 6K8. Then use a 750R resistor to the INVERTING input and you have around 20db gain inverting and a 750R load on the preceeding stage. You would probably need to parallel around 4 2SK170, but you would then get around 40db gain in the frontend. Slightly rearrange the cascode to use a negative supply to give near 0V on the output (servo controlled CCS?) and you should have somthing quite unique.... Then the circuit no longer inverts polarity and it owes a lot to a certain famoust Phonostage, but without the added complexity of a rail symmetric folded cascode. Sayonara Edit, attached a quick job on Werners schematic, showing instead of the folded cascode a current mirror with an option to increase the current gain of the circuit above that of the J-Fet.... The input CTRL on the second FET should adjust the current for 0V on the output (servo). The ratio between the resistor in the current mirror should probably be around 5, not 10 as shown, this would give around 150mA/V effective transconductance which with 750Ohm load gives around 41db gain, the OPA627 stage will then give 19db gain for a total gain of 60db overall. Switching the resistors in the Current Mirror and in the source of the second (current source) FET would accomodate a gain adjustment for use with MM Pickups as well....
__________________
Freedom is always the freedom of those who express ideas and views that YOU disagree with. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Belgium
|
Hi T,
of course I know where your interpolation comes from ;-) Have been contemplating similar on and off for a while now. Sadly still no time to build things. The current mirror variant is interesting. The design space expands ... W |
|
|
|
|
#19 | ||
|
Previously: Kuei Yang Wang
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Somewhere nice on planet earth
|
Konnichiwa Ogiers San,
Quote:
Quote:
If we make the input resistor 5k1 (and EQ capacitor 15nF) and scale the feedback EQ network to 510K//6n2 and 51K we get a little more noise than the self noise of the OPA627 but we get the gain we need using just one 30mA/V Yfs J-FET (2 SK170 etc). We can than use a 4.7uF coupling capacitor between cascode and Op-Amp which is still managable in terms of size/cost as film capacitor. The EQ should be "close enough" at 3162/316.2/76.5uS, if we parallel 270K to the 5K1 input resistor we get the exact 75uS.... Then we get the attached.... We may need to adjust R8 to get the DC operating conditions of the cascode right and as said parallel 270K to R1. For a MM Version I suspect the frontend has insuffucient headroom to use just the series resistor, so some additional form of switching may be needed to handle that. Sayonara
__________________
Freedom is always the freedom of those who express ideas and views that YOU disagree with. |
||
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Netherlands
|
Hi Werner,
Since you are coupling the cascode output AC why use an inverted anyway? Just for PSU voltage reasons? Cheers
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| folded cascode | the_tool | Chip Amps | 1 | 27th June 2006 10:53 PM |
| Folded Cascode Sound? | wrenchone | Solid State | 16 | 26th February 2004 06:56 AM |
| folded cascode puzzling | drakonis | Pass Labs | 6 | 30th March 2002 10:04 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.13111 seconds (80.76% PHP - 19.24% MySQL) with 11 queries |