|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Analogue Source Turntables, Tonearms, Cartridges, Phono Stages, Tuners, Tape Recorders, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#321 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Calgary on the Bow
|
Quote:
2) Generally when you design parts that move you design one part to be sorter so that part will wear first. This part is generally the less expensive or the easier part to get to to replace. I think that using a glass tube with a mohs hardness of about 6 and a bearing with a harder material makes thee most sense. I am not sure that I understand your question so if I have missed the point please reword it for me. 3) If you mount your glass tube into a material of similar hardness you can divert the energy some and then deal with it. A layer of shrink tube on the glass will damp it significantly especially if the shrink tube is adhesive lined. It does not always take a lot to damp things at high frequencies. You might have success with a few layers of clear lacquer on the outside of the tube. I see this as a design tweak rather than a major issue as bare glass works extremely well. 4) If you could reduce the drag or friction to zero sure the sled would just be dragged along and that would be fine. I think that some attention to sled geometry with respect to bearing contact and the sleds ability to track in a straight line would be beneficial. When the arm rides a warp the sled is literally dragged up the wall of the tube and gravity pulls it back down for you this is where riding the inside of a tube is so much better than riding on the outside of a tube. Inside gravity works for you and outside it just helps you to fall off. This design of Bo's is so clever and so very simple so very well thought out. I hope this helps and is of some use. Best regards Moray James.
__________________
moray james |
|
|
|
|
#322 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Haha! what a dumb question my no.4 was - if its frictionless its nirvana, not a problem!!!
Right - Nuf talky - more buildy!
__________________
'I have nothing. I owe much. The rest I leave to the poor. - Francois Rabelais satirist & doctor d.1553 |
|
|
|
#323 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: New York
|
Hi everyone,
I learned from this thread about the passing of Bo Hansson, very sorry about this. Does anyone here know whether his company is still selling his Cantus tonearm or parts for it? I've emailed to the address on his website, but my message as returned to me as undeliverable. Thanks for any news, Sean |
|
|
|
#324 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
see if you can find a reseller maybe.
Or build you own
__________________
'I have nothing. I owe much. The rest I leave to the poor. - Francois Rabelais satirist & doctor d.1553 |
|
|
|
#325 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: New York
|
|
|
|
|
#326 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
off the top of my head the only VTA built in on the DIY versions I can remember is to mount the tube 'block' on a large threaded bar.
how about allowing the block to slide up a delrin rod and shim it out as needed? I'm just going to set mine within my cartridges ideal a be done. Guess it depends o the compliance but thats been discussed a few pages back.
__________________
'I have nothing. I owe much. The rest I leave to the poor. - Francois Rabelais satirist & doctor d.1553 |
|
|
|
#327 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Medfield, MA, USA
|
Quote:
Quote:
Just checking in to let you all know I'm still here. Been busy around the house and there were a few clocks to tend to. So nothing much with the Cantus Clone save listening to some music with supper or other odd moments. I'm still very pleased with the LT arm and a polished design is shaping up in my mind. Got to find some good wire soon and come up with a good support for it so that there is no, or at least uniform, drag on the carriage. What I'm using now occasionally causes skips. Most of the time though, no problem. I'm anxious to see some more results on these projects. BillG Last edited by bgruhn; 14th February 2012 at 04:49 AM. Reason: minor correction |
||
|
|
|
#328 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: California Central Coast
|
VTA,
The screw head is captured between the t-nut and the cap. Screwing it in lowers the arm, screwing it out raises it. I thought the pictures would do a better job of showing how things work. If there are questions, I'll be glad to help.
__________________
Doug Tuthill |
|
|
|
#329 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: souht of france
|
Hello everyone,
I take this post in progress and will try to make my small contribution.Here is an arm that I made inspired by the design of "cantus", except that the arm is pneumatic, decoupling and damping of the arm support is provided by a viscous liquid ..
|
|
|
|
#330 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: New York
|
Quote:
Are the other two screws in the top plate holding/leveling the copper tube? I was trying to figure out how to accomplish leveling the tube, the mounting plate and VTA altogether, seems like your version manages it nicely. Thanks! |
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The Ikea curtain rail air parallel tracking tonearm! | ericpeters | Analogue Source | 169 | 15th October 2011 01:08 AM |
| My take on TPA's Opus DAC | orthoefer | Digital Source | 9 | 18th April 2008 01:51 PM |
| Opus Dei! | mikeks | Music | 6 | 25th January 2005 10:37 PM |
| Parallel amps & Parallel Voice coils? | officeboy | Multi-Way | 7 | 26th May 2004 07:12 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.13445 seconds (84.86% PHP - 15.14% MySQL) with 11 queries |