Go Back   Home > Forums > Source & Line > Analogue Source
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Analogue Source Turntables, Tonearms, Cartridges, Phono Stages, Tuners, Tape Recorders, etc.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 13th June 2004, 12:19 AM   #71
diyAudio Senior Member
 
fdegrove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Belgium
Hi,

Quote:
I'm interested to see what happns when you treat a fairly crappy cartidge like the Stanton 680 as a current source operating into a low impedance summing node.
FWIW, the Stanton 68x series aren't even MM cartridges but rather of the moving iron variety.
Not that it would matter for what you're trying to do but still.

Quote:
Jan Didden used a similar circuit quite a while back as an I-V converter for a 1541 DAC.
Dunno what exactly it was JD did but I know a few reasons why one would go down that road for I/V conversion in a DAC (not all of them) iso using say, a resistor, resistively loaded xformer or the ubiquitous opamps.

Catridges aren't DACs and vice versa....so I second Analog_sa 100% here.

Cheers,
__________________
Frank
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th June 2004, 01:53 AM   #72
angel is offline angel  Norway
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Norway
Quote:
Originally posted by john curl
...
This overdamped the MC cartridges. I proved this by rewiring the design to be switchable to either 100 ohms input or grounded base (very low Z) and listened to the difference. 100 ohms input won the contest.
Could you please elaborate as to the sonic difference between the two approaches? There tends to be some differences of opinion about which sound more closely approximates the source. And, I'm curious about whether the sonic improvement was, as you say, due to reducing the cartridge damping, or due to other things, such as increasing the damping of the Q of the inductor, etc..
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th December 2005, 06:02 PM   #73
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Just curios to discover if anybody has built any phono from what it has been discussed here?
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd April 2006, 11:13 AM   #74
diyAudio Member
 
Onvinyl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Germany
Quote:
Originally posted by scott wurcer
Brian - If you want a quick try on this, take the lowest _voltage_ noise CFA you can find, use the cartridge resistance as gain resistor and an appropriate resistor as feedback resistance to get the gain. So if you have a cartridge that measures 5 Ohms say use a 500 Ohm feedback resistor. I don't think any offsets get in the way current or voltage (a few microAmps one way or the other flow in the coil). OTOH you might want to select for lowish Vos or tweek it (pot on the rails with a big divider to the +input, for instance).

Hi,
in my current project (a deviation from rjm's phonoclone), I use the AD811 in the way Scott described here some time ago. I've tried some other chips here, (both cfa and 'normal'), but that one works best. That with -probably Ri-wise- suboptimal DL103.
But, I have a strange issue: without tweaking the offset, I have an input offset of around 0.2 - 0.4 mV. It works with the denon cartridge, but i fear it would fry a cart with say Ri=1 Ohm.
However, if I tweak the offset to zero as described by Scott, the sound gets dull as if the tweeter is missing. Can that be? Or is this something else going wrong?
Rüdiger
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
DIY phono to replace roksan phono stage seroxatmad Analog Line Level 6 14th December 2008 06:46 PM
new phono stage or old preamp with phono? flohmann Analog Line Level 2 2nd October 2008 10:51 PM
reduce before amplifying? kathodyne Tubes / Valves 11 8th September 2005 12:44 PM
Should I replace Scott 222C phono stage with Claret phono stage? Bing Yang Analogue Source 0 22nd August 2005 07:41 AM
Current amplifying vs. voltage amplifying. roly94 Solid State 14 23rd July 2002 10:32 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 06:41 PM.

Page generated in 0.09761 seconds (72.46% PHP - 27.54% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio