|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Analogue Source Turntables, Tonearms, Cartridges, Phono Stages, Tuners, Tape Recorders, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#51 | |
|
Banned
|
Quote:
Don't be too modest. The Levinson JC-1AC was the best head amp I could find in that time. I compared it with numerous head amps from Ortofon, Thorens, Van Den Hul a.o. and even more step up transformers. The JC-1 AC was always the clear winner. My own JC-1AC was struck by lightning on the electricity grid of the street illumination. Also the cartridge and some modules in the JC-2 were gone. When this happened the model was discontinued so I decided to build my own with the SSM2017.
|
|
|
|
|
#52 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: berkeley ca
|
Elso, it might be that your phono cartridge preferred a summing type input or low Z. The JC-1 AC sounded 'overdamped' with my phono cartridges. I am not criticizing the rest of the design that much, even if I don't use it anymore.
Now, this thread has all sorts of people 'discovering' summing type inputs and while this is OK, it can also be a problem. For example, about 20 years ago, I designed my Vendetta Research SCP-1 (SCP-2 as well) input stage with a link that could be changed to have a summing type input. In future designs I have thought to eliminate this link because it didn't seem necessary for modern moving cartridges. However, JCarr and others have found low Z to be a good load for moving coil cartridges in some models. This is interesting to me, but I do wish that I had a specific model MC, or a design parameter to follow in order to determine what direction to go. |
|
|
|
#53 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: USA
|
So, John, to clarify what people have not stated clearly:
In the "old days" when the summing junction input (transimpedance amp) was useful for phono cartridges, the cartridges themselves had very low impedance and very low output. The advent of MC's with medium/high outputs (and corresponding higher output impedances <due to more windings of finer wire?>), the transimpedance input is not the best match. (the bottom line being that cartridge designers have been trying to make their designs easier to interface with "normal" electronics, improve s/n, etc.) Is this a correct summary? If so, it would seem that this would still be useful for cartridges that are still designed using very low-Z.
__________________
bel |
|
|
|
#54 | |
|
diyAudio Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Belgium
|
Hi,
Quote:
The top quality MCs are still very low output and since these tend to be fitted to the best systems around, the capability of the preamp to convert that tiny signal into a usable voltage is still as important and difficult as ever. Cheers,
__________________
Frank |
|
|
|
|
#55 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: berkeley ca
|
Actually I don't know what the exact mechansim is, but I was once told that the magnetic assembly is important. Hi Z windings certainly would 'tend' to increase the optimum loading, all else being equal, but many MC's are still low Z and apparently, in one extreme case, best loaded with low Z. Go figure! Where are the phono cartridge designers, now that we need them?
|
|
|
|
#56 | |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
Quote:
__________________
“Listening to records is like ****ing a picture of Brigitte Bardot.” - Sergiu Celibidache |
|
|
|
|
#57 |
|
diyAudio Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Belgium
|
Hi,
Not from the one you probably had in mind but here's the specs of one of the best I know: J.A. MC 2 Finish: Coil impedance 32 Ohm Load impedance 845 Ohm Load capacity 150 pF Stylus pressure 1.8 Grams, (Max Tolerance 0.05 Gram) Output Voltage 200 µV Max tracing capacity 400 µmm Channel separation 70 dB at 100 Hz 60 dB at 1 Khz 70 dB at 20 Khz Frequency range 3 Hz to 100 Khz Total THD % 0.1 % Total unit weight 10 Grams ( incl. socket screws) Cheers,
__________________
Frank |
|
|
|
#58 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: berkeley ca
|
I am sorry that we got no feedback from MC cartridge designers. 845 ohms? Oh sure!
|
|
|
|
#59 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
Well, John, going to 847 ohms can ruin the soundstage and smear the transient purity. Or something. At 843 ohms, the timing, rhythm, and pace of the music is altered beyond recognition. Or something.
__________________
“Listening to records is like ****ing a picture of Brigitte Bardot.” - Sergiu Celibidache |
|
|
|
#60 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: As far from the NOSsers as possible
|
You need to stop reading the Naim users group forum.
Jocko |
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| DIY phono to replace roksan phono stage | seroxatmad | Analog Line Level | 6 | 14th December 2008 05:46 PM |
| new phono stage or old preamp with phono? | flohmann | Analog Line Level | 2 | 2nd October 2008 09:51 PM |
| reduce before amplifying? | kathodyne | Tubes / Valves | 11 | 8th September 2005 11:44 AM |
| Should I replace Scott 222C phono stage with Claret phono stage? | Bing Yang | Analogue Source | 0 | 22nd August 2005 06:41 AM |
| Current amplifying vs. voltage amplifying. | roly94 | Solid State | 14 | 23rd July 2002 09:32 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.12098 seconds (79.66% PHP - 20.34% MySQL) with 11 queries |