Go Back   Home > Forums > Source & Line > Analogue Source
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Analogue Source Turntables, Tonearms, Cartridges, Phono Stages, Tuners, Tape Recorders, etc.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 25th April 2004, 07:21 AM   #51
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Zamboanga, City of Flowers, Mindanao
Send a message via Yahoo to Elso Kwak
Thumbs up The Levinson JC-1AC

Quote:
Originally posted by john curl
The Levinson JC-1AC was developed 29 years ago as an AC version of the JC-1. However, I made a 'fatal' mistake. I used a LOW Z input by using a grounded base connection as the input. This overdamped the MC cartridges. I proved this by rewiring the design to be switchable to either 100 ohms input or grounded base (very low Z) and listened to the difference. 100 ohms input won the contest.
Hello John,
Don't be too modest. The Levinson JC-1AC was the best head amp I could find in that time.
I compared it with numerous head amps from Ortofon, Thorens, Van Den Hul a.o. and even more step up transformers. The JC-1 AC was always the clear winner.
My own JC-1AC was struck by lightning on the electricity grid of the street illumination. Also the cartridge and some modules in the JC-2 were gone. When this happened the model was discontinued so I decided to build my own with the SSM2017.
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th April 2004, 11:50 PM   #52
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: berkeley ca
Elso, it might be that your phono cartridge preferred a summing type input or low Z. The JC-1 AC sounded 'overdamped' with my phono cartridges. I am not criticizing the rest of the design that much, even if I don't use it anymore.
Now, this thread has all sorts of people 'discovering' summing type inputs and while this is OK, it can also be a problem. For example, about 20 years ago, I designed my Vendetta Research SCP-1 (SCP-2 as well) input stage with a link that could be changed to have a summing type input. In future designs I have thought to eliminate this link because it didn't seem necessary for modern moving cartridges. However, JCarr and others have found low Z to be a good load for moving coil cartridges in some models. This is interesting to me, but I do wish that I had a specific model MC, or a design parameter to follow in order to determine what direction to go.
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th April 2004, 02:00 PM   #53
BrianL is offline BrianL  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: USA
So, John, to clarify what people have not stated clearly:

In the "old days" when the summing junction input (transimpedance
amp) was useful for phono cartridges, the cartridges themselves
had very low impedance and very low output. The advent of
MC's with medium/high outputs (and corresponding higher
output impedances <due to more windings of finer wire?>),
the transimpedance input is not the best match.
(the bottom line being that cartridge designers have been
trying to make their designs easier to interface with "normal"
electronics, improve s/n, etc.)

Is this a correct summary?

If so, it would seem that this would still be useful for cartridges
that are still designed using very low-Z.
__________________
bel
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th April 2004, 02:27 PM   #54
diyAudio Senior Member
 
fdegrove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Belgium
Hi,

Quote:
If so, it would seem that this would still be useful for cartridges
IMO, certainly.
The top quality MCs are still very low output and since these tend to be fitted to the best systems around, the capability of the preamp to convert that tiny signal into a usable voltage is still as important and difficult as ever.

Cheers,
__________________
Frank
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th April 2004, 06:37 PM   #55
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: berkeley ca
Actually I don't know what the exact mechansim is, but I was once told that the magnetic assembly is important. Hi Z windings certainly would 'tend' to increase the optimum loading, all else being equal, but many MC's are still low Z and apparently, in one extreme case, best loaded with low Z. Go figure! Where are the phono cartridge designers, now that we need them?
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th April 2004, 06:46 PM   #56
SY is offline SY  United States
diyAudio Moderator
 
SY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Austin, TX
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Where are the phono cartridge designers, now that we need them?
I'm telling you guys, give up this magnetic stuff. FM cartridges are the way to go. Where's Paul Weathers now that we need him?
__________________
“Listening to records is like ****ing a picture of Brigitte Bardot.” - Sergiu Celibidache
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th April 2004, 11:54 PM   #57
diyAudio Senior Member
 
fdegrove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Belgium
Hi,

Not from the one you probably had in mind but here's the specs of one of the best I know:

J.A. MC 2 Finish:

Coil impedance 32 Ohm

Load impedance 845 Ohm

Load capacity 150 pF

Stylus pressure 1.8 Grams, (Max Tolerance 0.05 Gram)

Output Voltage 200 µV

Max tracing capacity 400 µmm

Channel separation 70 dB at 100 Hz

60 dB at 1 Khz

70 dB at 20 Khz

Frequency range 3 Hz to 100 Khz

Total THD % 0.1 %

Total unit weight 10 Grams ( incl. socket screws)

Cheers,
__________________
Frank
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th April 2004, 10:30 PM   #58
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: berkeley ca
I am sorry that we got no feedback from MC cartridge designers. 845 ohms? Oh sure!
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th April 2004, 10:55 PM   #59
SY is offline SY  United States
diyAudio Moderator
 
SY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Austin, TX
Blog Entries: 1
Well, John, going to 847 ohms can ruin the soundstage and smear the transient purity. Or something. At 843 ohms, the timing, rhythm, and pace of the music is altered beyond recognition. Or something.
__________________
“Listening to records is like ****ing a picture of Brigitte Bardot.” - Sergiu Celibidache
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th April 2004, 12:17 AM   #60
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: As far from the NOSsers as possible
Default PRAT?????

You need to stop reading the Naim users group forum.

Jocko
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
DIY phono to replace roksan phono stage seroxatmad Analog Line Level 6 14th December 2008 05:46 PM
new phono stage or old preamp with phono? flohmann Analog Line Level 2 2nd October 2008 09:51 PM
reduce before amplifying? kathodyne Tubes / Valves 11 8th September 2005 11:44 AM
Should I replace Scott 222C phono stage with Claret phono stage? Bing Yang Analogue Source 0 22nd August 2005 06:41 AM
Current amplifying vs. voltage amplifying. roly94 Solid State 14 23rd July 2002 09:32 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 07:31 AM.

Page generated in 0.12098 seconds (79.66% PHP - 20.34% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio