Go Back   Home > Forums > Source & Line > Analogue Source
Home Forums Articles Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Analogue Source Turntables, Tonearms, Cartridges, Phono Stages, Tuners, Tape Recorders, etc.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 18th August 2004, 05:04 PM   #21
EC8010 is offline EC8010  
diyAudio Moderator
 
EC8010's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Near London. UK
The only reason for having an aerial amplifier is to overcome the losses down the cable to the receiver - and that means it should be a mast-head amplifier, probably with quite low gain (6dB). Anything else is likely to amplify muck and expose the receiver's front-end to overload and intermodulation. Nothing beats a better aerial.

Actually, one thing does. A better feeder. Most aerial cable is so leaky that it picks up as much signal as the aerial. Trouble is, unlike the aerial, it's not tuned and it's not pointed in the right direction. Use a proper low loss professional cable with a foil Rheunissen screen.
__________________
The loudspeaker: The only commercial Hi-Fi item where a disproportionate part of the budget isn't spent on the box. And the one where it would make a difference...
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th August 2004, 08:57 PM   #22
ALW is offline ALW  
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Quote:
Actually, one thing does. A better feeder. Most aerial cable is so leaky that it picks up as much signal as the aerial. Trouble is, unlike the aerial, it's not tuned and it's not pointed in the right direction. Use a proper low loss professional cable with a foil Rheunissen screen.
This is exactly the reason I recommend excessive antenna gain.

Feeder pickup is always a fixed, constant value (for a given installation) and always non-zero. By having excessive gain and therefore signal strength, you can attenuate at the receiver input. This brings the input signal to the correct level, whilst attenuating the fixed, unwanted, cable pickup.

Andy.
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th August 2004, 10:08 PM   #23
EC8010 is offline EC8010  
diyAudio Moderator
 
EC8010's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Near London. UK
Good thought.
__________________
The loudspeaker: The only commercial Hi-Fi item where a disproportionate part of the budget isn't spent on the box. And the one where it would make a difference...
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th August 2004, 11:18 PM   #24
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Auburn, WA (somewhere between Seattle and Tacoma)
Blog Entries: 1
Send a message via ICQ to Damon Hill
I dug out my old Heathkit switched attenuator (up to 70 db)
and plugged it into my mediocre Fisher tuner. No amount of
attenuation will drive most of the local stations into the
noise. Cheap plastic case and open wiring still leaks in
a useable amount of signal. I'll have to try to rewire the
input with proper coax; originally it was 300 ohm balanced, to
which I'd added a balun and a F connector on the back panel.

I was hoping to make a guess as to how much signal that jpole
is pulling in; wonder if my ham neighbor has a RF microvoltmeter?

My presently defunct Heathkit AJ-29 was modified for coax and
that effectively eliminated leakage.

At one time I had a FM band JFET preselector, designed by Bob Cooper, I think; it actually worked fairly well in combination
with the attenuator (which originally came with the IM-57 TV
sweep generator). There are other ham tricks I haven't tried,
such as tuned cavity traps and bandpass filters, but I haven't
been in a position to need such, yet.

I found some general comments on RF amplifiers and preselectors
with a working example of a low-noise MOSFET preamp on this page:

http://www.geocities.com/toddemslie/bf981_preamp.html
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Alpine FM reception sigfrid Car Audio 25 10th October 2007 12:07 AM
Reception On Tuning Scale Not Functioning Right. Need Help 65blkbkgt Car Audio 2 15th July 2007 11:58 AM
tripath amp interfering with radio reception ractis Class D 3 9th May 2007 08:27 PM
Mp3 player FM reception. v-bro Parts 0 4th December 2006 12:06 AM
how to get better radio reception ? My96p71 Car Audio 2 15th August 2004 07:55 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 06:10 PM.

Page generated in 0.07072711 seconds (73.31% PHP - 26.69% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2010 diyAudio