Calculating inductor based passive RIAA - diyAudio
 Calculating inductor based passive RIAA
 User Name Stay logged in? Password
 Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Gallery Wiki Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Search

 Analogue Source Turntables, Tonearms, Cartridges, Phono Stages, Tuners, Tape Recorders, etc.

 Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you. Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
 10th December 2015, 08:01 AM #1 diyAudio Member   Join Date: Oct 2015 Location: Zgorzelec Calculating inductor based passive RIAA I was thinking about making a phono preamp without caps in RIAA circuit. Will this topology be good? If so, how to calculate the inductors and resistor values? (knowing the preceding stage output impedance and following stage grid resistor value).
 10th December 2015, 08:34 AM #2 diyAudio Member   Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Kuala Lumpur Just because something is possible does not make it sensible. Realistic values of grid and output impedance will require very high inductance values
 10th December 2015, 08:51 AM #3 diyAudio Member   Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: .. the right material, construction caps are some of the most linear, near ideal components in electronics for audio frequency the best inductors are usually poor to very bad in nonlinearities, parasitics, frequency dependent losses... Last edited by jcx; 10th December 2015 at 09:04 AM.
 10th December 2015, 09:01 AM #4 diyAudio Member   Join Date: May 2007 Those who wish to use an unusual topology should understand it enough to know why they want to use it instead of the more common better topologies. As a side effect of this, they will know how to calculate it. There are good reasons why people generally use C and R for RIAA networks.
 10th December 2015, 07:01 PM #5 diyAudio Member   Join Date: Oct 2015 Location: Zgorzelec I am fully aware of all limitations and difficulties related with this type of RIAA correction. But I'm willing to try it anyway, just for fun. To be honest, I don't "understand" why I want to use it. But I also don't understand why I'm using turntables and single ended triode amplifiers in 2015 when there's class D amplification and high end digital audio equipment all around :P. From what I know, there ARE some commercial RIAA preamps using L filters, so there are some people who might be preferring them.
 10th December 2015, 07:44 PM #6 diyAudio Member   Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: Berlin The good reasons for building phono correction networks from rc networks is that it requires little thought, little space, little money and little courage. The sound quality you get out of network copied from the RCA manual is the same: little. __________________ I like "effects boxes". As long as the effect is the right one.
 10th December 2015, 07:46 PM #7 diyAudio Member   Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: Berlin __________________ I like "effects boxes". As long as the effect is the right one.
 11th December 2015, 07:35 AM #8 diyAudio Member   Join Date: Oct 2015 Location: Zgorzelec Thanks for the links, a very interesting read. Though I don't consider RC preamps bad sounding (for now), I got bored of making them and LR seems a nice alternative .
diyAudio Member

Join Date: May 2007
Quote:
 Originally Posted by kaputt The good reasons for building phono correction networks from rc networks is that it requires little thought, little space, little money and little courage.
Does "courage" improve audio reproduction?

Quote:
 The sound quality you get out of network copied from the RCA manual is the same: little.
It could still be better than an LR network.

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Pulatom I got bored of making them and LR seems a nice alternative
"Nice" in what sense? More hum pickup, more expensive, more distortion, lower Q (so requiring circuit compensation) - all 'nice' features to have in a circuit.

diyAudio Moderator

Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Chicagoland
Blog Entries: 2
Quote:
 Originally Posted by DF96 "Nice" in what sense? More hum pickup, more expensive, more distortion, lower Q (so requiring circuit compensation) - all 'nice' features to have in a circuit.
Let's be fair- one could easily argue that using a tube amp is similarly crazy, yet you and I both do. Why? It's entertaining to use a (now) uncommon technology, and with proper design and construction, we get performance good enough to be "hi fi."

Now, if one claims that an LR preamp will outperform a competent RC circuit, I would want to see some good data backing up that remarkable claim (or an analogous claim about a tube amplifier outperforming a competent solid state design).
__________________
Remember: life is ten per cent what happens to you, ten per cent how you respond to it, and eighty per cent how good your reflexes are when the Tall Ones come at your throat with their pincers.

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are Off Pingbacks are Off Refbacks are Off Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post PhantomBox Construction Tips 6 9th October 2014 03:44 PM limono Tubes / Valves 12 11th July 2014 11:46 AM dooper Analog Line Level 12 17th December 2012 03:21 PM alexclaber Multi-Way 33 19th May 2008 08:06 AM Herrmann Everything Else 0 23rd July 2002 08:10 PM

 New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:23 PM.