Great entry table Technics SL-220: upgrade paths? - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Source & Line > Analogue Source

Analogue Source Turntables, Tonearms, Cartridges, Phono Stages, Tuners, Tape Recorders, etc.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 8th January 2013, 09:58 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Hamilton, was Ottawa (Canada)
Default Great entry table Technics SL-220: upgrade paths?

Scored a good condition 220 locally for $20 and, after a speed pot cleaning and new belt, she’s up and soundin’ sweet!

From:
Technics SL-220 - AudioKarma.org Home Audio Stereo Discussion Forums
and
Technics SL-220 checklist? - AudioKarma.org Home Audio Stereo Discussion Forums
I’ve gathered some info:

Plastic but TNRC (Technics non-resonant compound)
FG Servo DC motor (less hum)
Similar arm to SL-1200 (same/similar geometry, armtube and headshell and good bearings)

To make servicing even easier, the service manual is available at Vinyl Engine!
Technics SL-220 Owners Manual, Service Manual, Schematics, Free Download | Vinyl Engine

Here are the specs from the manual:

SL-220 specs.jpg

A few cartridges were mentioned:

Grado Prestige line ($80-250)
Audio-Technica AT440MLa ($170), AT120E/t ($100), AT13E2 ($60)
Ortofon FF15E MKII ($)
Shure M91ED ($70) and Shure M97xe ($90)

A good first upgrade would be the cartridge--it came with a Stanton L720.
I’m new to vinyl: how do I match the cart to the arm?

One guy says that the SL-220/230 “works especially well with Grado cartridges. The FG servo DC motor doesn't induce hum and the arm's effective mass is a good match to the compliance of the Grado Prestige line.”

The SL-220 arm is 230mm and 13g. The manual suggests a cart between 5.5 and 8.5g. The Grado Green/Black1 and Red/Blue1 have a weight of 5.5g and a compliance of 20. Is there more to 'compliance' than this?

Any other suggestions?

Cheers,
Jeff

Last edited by AudioLapDance; 8th January 2013 at 10:09 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th January 2013, 06:32 AM   #2
benb is offline benb  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Those Technics speed control pots seem to always be flaky. I wonder if it has DC going through it or what. I can imagine making a "lightspeed" type LED/CDS cell speed control circuit to replace the pot, but I wonder about drift.

I have a SL-1300 (either a thrift store or yard sale buy, it's been so long I forget which) with an AT440MLa that I like. I also have a Grado Blue and I like the AT MUCH better. Amazon had it on sale a couple years ago for $99 which was a bargain.

The compliance is "springiness" of the stylus assembly. It and the effective mass of the tonearm/cartridge combination determine the resonant frequency of the cartridge-arm system. 10Hz is supposed to be ideal. This resonance gets activated anytime there's a bump or sharp warp in the record, so it's mainly a problem with non-flat records.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th January 2013, 06:04 PM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Hamilton, was Ottawa (Canada)
Default Pics of guts

Here are some pics of the guts:

Underside
sl-220 underside.jpg

Speed pots
sl-220 var pots PCB.jpg

Freq Gen PCB bottom
sl-220 speed PCB bottom.jpg

Freq Gen PCB top
sl-220 speed PCB top.jpg
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th January 2013, 06:13 PM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Hamilton, was Ottawa (Canada)
More!

Auto return gears
sl-220 auto return gears.jpg

Strobe
sl-220 strobe.jpg

Under arm, anti-skate
sl-220 under arm anti skate.jpg

FG servo DC motor
sl-220 FG servo dc motor.jpg
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th January 2013, 06:28 PM   #5
sreten is offline sreten  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
Hi,

Grado's are alright if you don't mind the top octave missing.

Three great budget buys are :
Ed Saunders Red Ed Cartridge
and
Amazon.com: at92ecd

The former match your arm a little better than the latter.

rgds, sreten.
__________________
There is nothing so practical as a really good theory - Ludwig Boltzmann
When your only tool is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail - Abraham Maslow

Last edited by sreten; 12th January 2013 at 06:56 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th January 2013, 09:16 PM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Hamilton, was Ottawa (Canada)
Here's the specs for the Red Ed Elliptical

Frequency Response 20Hz-20kHz±3dB
Channel Balance 2dB @ 1kHz
Channel Separation 20dB @ 1kHz
Sensitivity 5mV±2dB, 1kHz @ 5 cm/sec
Static Compliance 16mm/N
Equivalent tip mass 0.7 mg
Vertical Tracking Angle 26°
Stylus Radius Elliptical .007X.003
Load Resistance 47,000 Ohm
Cartridge Weight 4.2g


The SL-220 arm is 230mm and 13g. The manual suggests a cart between 5.5 and 8.5g

The Red Ed is 4.2g is that too light? Does the Red Ed Static Compliance of 16mm/N play into this?

I can't find the weight of the at92ecd?!?

Thanks for the help,
Jeff
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th January 2013, 09:38 PM   #7
sreten is offline sreten  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
Hi,

Both will be fine with your arm, but the RedEd's will match a little better.

Basically you add cartridge mass to the arm effective mass and this
number combined with the cartridge compliance determines the
resonant frequency of the arm/cartridge, should be ~ 10Hz.

The technics arm with original headshell is quite lightweight, compared
to other similar looking arms, and worth $20 on its own, compared to
similar looking others, its not too bad in absolute terms, in fact the
nice original headshell is worth around $20 on its own.

rgds, sreten.
__________________
There is nothing so practical as a really good theory - Ludwig Boltzmann
When your only tool is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail - Abraham Maslow
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th February 2013, 06:31 PM   #8
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Hamilton, was Ottawa (Canada)
Quote:
Originally Posted by sreten View Post
...
Basically you add cartridge mass to the arm effective mass and this
number combined with the cartridge compliance determines the
resonant frequency of the arm/cartridge, should be ~ 10Hz.
...
Hi Sreten, thanks you've put me on a little journey!

I made a spreadsheet to calc resonant frequency (of a few carts I'm considering: Red Ed, M97eX, AT440MLa, 2M Red, Grado[green, black, red, blue], and the OM5E+stylus10 that I have):

Fr calc w a few carts.png

Turntable compliance calculator.zip

The SL-220 arm is 230mm and 13g. The manual suggests a cart between 5.5 and 8.5g. Headshell = 9g , Arm = 13 - 9 = 4 g



The resonant frequency:

Fr= 1000 / [2 pi * sqrt(M * C)]

where, pi = 3.14 (approx), M = total effective mass in gm of the arm plus cartridge, and C = compliance of the cartridge in um/mN (um is micrometer and mN is milliNewton; um/MN is the same unit as micro cm/Dyne).

I understand I should aim for about 10 Hz (between the audio 20 Hz and the resonant freq of the turntable suspension ~1 Hz). I was using 16 as the compliance before (which gave close to 10 Hz!) then I realized I have to use the dynamic compliance not the static compliance. I emailed Ed (what a fascinating guy!) and he said:

They do not list the dynamic. That is not really a meaningful spec. It would be around 25 however.

So with the dynamic compliance of 25, the resonant freq is 7.7Hz
A little less than the 'ideal' 10Hz.

Hmmm ...


Thanks for the help,
Cheers,
Jeff

Last edited by AudioLapDance; 8th February 2013 at 06:39 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th February 2013, 07:47 PM   #9
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Hamilton, was Ottawa (Canada)
I also reverse calced the carts!

5.5g to 8.5g as recommended in the manual:

5.5g, dyn comp~14
8.5g, dyn comp~12

(assuming linear type relationship: 7g, dyn comp~13?)

for Fr~10z

  Reply With Quote
Old 12th February 2013, 12:57 AM   #10
nezbleu is online now nezbleu  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
nezbleu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Get some Duxseal and use it to cove the corners on the underside of the base, and fill some of those gaps. Just be careful not to gum up the auto mechanism. That will add mass and dampen resonances in the plinth, it helps a bit.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Technics sl-1200 mk1 suspension board and isolation upgrade murphythecat8 Analogue Source 19 29th July 2011 10:09 AM
Technics sl b202 - anybody has this one? 2use Analogue Source 0 16th July 2011 06:53 PM
Noob lost in the replacement (upgrade) of the tonearm of the technics sl-1200 jasonthegreat Analogue Source 9 17th June 2011 04:49 AM
Technics SL-220 Recable? Any Ideas? KP11520 Analogue Source 15 11th October 2007 02:32 PM
Technics SL-5 pinkmouse Analogue Source 22 5th July 2006 10:59 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:03 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2