|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Analogue Source Turntables, Tonearms, Cartridges, Phono Stages, Tuners, Tape Recorders, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#21 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: dixon ill
|
2 pole air gap variable cap 50-200pf for fine ajustment and switches at 200pf incraments for coarse?
same for resistance. i did this for my xono. i ended up redoing it stock though, k.i.s.s. princapal proved to be true.
__________________
I'm not crazy, my mother had me tested |
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
Quote:
__________________
"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence." - Carl Sagan |
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Budapest, Hungary
|
What about zero (input) impedance loading a MC cartridge, similar to a DAC I/V converter?
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2007
|
Decent plugs and sockets usually have better contacts than switches: more pressure, better wiping action, larger surface area.
Feeding an MC into a short would probably give you an HF cut due to the cartridge inductance. It might (I'm not sure) also affect the compliance and affect damping. An MC is quite different from a DAC current output. |
|
|
|
#27 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
__________________
I build, therefore I am. Last edited by vdi_nenna; 28th November 2012 at 02:36 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2007
|
Not really. Mechanical damping is used for cartridges. Extra electrical damping from a low load impedance might be unhelpful. Whether this is the case would depend on how tightly coupled the mechanical and electrical aspects are. In a speaker they are sufficiently coupled that one affects the other; I don't know about a cartridge but I would suspect the coupling is smaller as efficiency is less of an issue.
|
|
|
|
#29 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
__________________
I build, therefore I am. |
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Nice link Vince !
I have to say... ...having recently read Morgan Jones's enlightening description of 'resistor production techniques' in his exellent book 'Valve Amplifiers'... ...my current 'anxiety dreams' all concern resistors, not parallel position switches. Having dumped 'banana plugs' years ago... ...in favour of the superb 'Neutrik Speakon' connectors... ...I couldn't agree more about 'contact pressure', especially in the signal path. ( heavy currents here, of course ) Also as a user of the equally superb Audio Synthesis DIY built PA-138 stepped-attenuator... ...which has a number of switch-contacts in the signal-path... ...the anxiety level caused by this & the long-serving speaker-cables... ...remains firmly at the bottom of my list of 'system-worries'. ( system sounds good; ALWAYS room for improvement though; we think ) Si. |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| MM cartridge capacitance loading | stevomaso | Analog Line Level | 17 | 10th February 2012 08:18 AM |
| MC v MM Cartridges | Rosinante | Analogue Source | 3 | 19th November 2010 08:07 PM |
| Mm Or Mc | hal1 | Analogue Source | 5 | 9th August 2007 02:51 PM |
| MM Cartridge loading question | gurevise | Analogue Source | 7 | 16th December 2003 12:30 PM |
| MM or MC how to tell which one I have | Rino odorico | Analogue Source | 5 | 22nd September 2002 01:39 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |