Paradise Builders - Page 38 - diyAudio
 User Name Stay logged in? Password
 Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Gallery Wiki Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Search

 Analogue Source Turntables, Tonearms, Cartridges, Phono Stages, Tuners, Tape Recorders, etc.

 Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you. Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
diyAudio Member

Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Both feet on the ground (near Gouda)
Quote:
 Originally Posted by beetle Uled=1.918V Ur102=3.448V
That is 1.9 + 3.4 = 5.3V the expected voltage here is V(L111) + V(L112) - Vbe(Q104) and that is 1.9 + 1.9 - 0.6 = 3.2V. It is actualy 2.1V to high, check the led voltages L111 and L112 and replace them if needed. Replace Q4 and posibly replace Q103.

There is one thing that I do not understand, V(L110) = 1.918V so V(R104) should be 1.9 - 0.6 = 1.3V and I(R104) should be 1.3 / 10 = 130mA and that should not depend on V(TP103), mmm... anyone else?

diyAudio Member

Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Munich, Germany
Quote:
 Originally Posted by FdW I'm not sure where you did measure these, can give your voltages as indicated in the attached PDF? The total wattage from the raw-PSU is being disipated in the regulator (about 120mA @ 24V = 30 Watt (more or less)), if the RIAA is not connected it will get very hot. Check the voltage across the two 10 Ohm (R140/204) resistors, it should be 1.2V.
oops... 120mA @ 24V is 2.88W....

With an input voltage of 30V, and output voltage of 18V, power dissipation in the shunt is 2 x 12V x 120mA = 2.9W, that should be no problem for the heatsink. (that was also the design target).

If the outputs are shorted, all power dissipation goes into the current source transistors, but it will be the same power dissipation. If the outputs are open, the power dissipation goes into all power transistors, still teh same total power. If the amplifier is connected and draws power, the power dissipation in the regulator is reduced accordingly and the temperature should be lower than in the other two cases.

So it should be quite foolproof, unless the stuffing devil has hit you....

diyAudio Member

Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Both feet on the ground (near Gouda)
Quote:
 Originally Posted by hesener oops... 120mA @ 24V is 2.88W.... With an input voltage of 30V, and output voltage of 18V, power dissipation in the shunt is 2 x 12V x 120mA = 2.9W, that should be no problem for the heatsink. (that was also the design target). If the outputs are shorted, all power dissipation goes into the current source transistors, but it will be the same power dissipation. If the outputs are open, the power dissipation goes into all power transistors, still teh same total power. If the amplifier is connected and draws power, the power dissipation in the regulator is reduced accordingly and the temperature should be lower than in the other two cases. So it should be quite foolproof, unless the stuffing devil has hit you....
Ooops one zero too many, sorry for that.

Also: If the RIAA is not connected, then all (potential output) power is consumed by the shunt.

And, yes, it should be 'quite foolproof'

Last edited by FdW; 3rd December 2012 at 09:43 AM.

 3rd December 2012, 09:50 AM #374 diyAudio Member   Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Munich, Germany [QUOTE=FdW;3268178 And, yes, it should be 'quite foolproof' [/QUOTE] That's what we expect from you, and how the shunt actually behaves in reality ;-) I am still considering doing a separate PCB for it (if you don't mind of course) because it can be used in many different applications, due to its very good quality
diyAudio Member

Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Cascais
Quote:
 Originally Posted by hesener I am still considering doing a separate PCB for it (if you don't mind of course) because it can be used in many different applications, due to its very good quality

I agree. Very nice shunt. Already planning to cut off the shunt part of the pcb if nothing comes out of the riaa.

diyAudio Member

Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Both feet on the ground (near Gouda)
Quote:
 Originally Posted by hesener That's what we expect from you, and how the shunt actually behaves in reality ;-) I am still considering doing a separate PCB for it (if you don't mind of course) because it can be used in many different applications, due to its very good quality
Thanks Yes it is a good idea to make a board for it, the number of LED's in the LED-string should be something line 20 for up to 42Volts output. The CroMagnon is, for instance, running at 35Volt and needs 17 LED's in the string.

diyAudio Member

Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Cascais
Here is a picture of the output with a 1k cart loading resistor at input. Approx 7-8mV @8MHz (ignore displayed vertical scale).

When the input is loaded with 47ohm oscillating frequency stays the same but amplitude triples.

So far i have not played with PS decoupling of the input stage or mirrors as presumably the layout works with the particular combination of parts some builders have already tried. Why it doesn't work with what i got from the group buy is indeed a mystery.

Has anyone successfully built a Paradise using the GB parts?
Attached Images
 Parad l-ch.JPG (151.7 KB, 275 views)

 3rd December 2012, 01:07 PM #378 diyAudio Member     Join Date: Oct 2010 Location: Burlington, NC Is it possible that the parts are the issue as i have seen some discussion in that GB thread as to the legitimacy of some components? __________________ ...Shape the sound , Man!
 3rd December 2012, 01:21 PM #379 diyAudio Member     Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Cascais I am aware of the discussion - it seems to be based on the general discontent of one contributor, rather than any solid fact. The problem most probably has to do with the particular batches of transistors, or maybe only the Hfe. Hopefully someone will come up with a solution. Shame about the pretty boards, at least those seem to withstand quite a lot of abuse... Wasn't the initial version scrapped because of oscillations blamed on the output bipolar buffer and hence the fet update? Looks like it wasn't the buffer.
 3rd December 2012, 01:48 PM #380 diyAudio Member   Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Munich, Germany In R1 it was pretty much the entire board oscillating, I was trying to implement a fancty-pantsy-ground layout which basically didnt work. The R2 and R3 (which you have) now have: 1. one BIG ground plane with short connnections 2. SMD footprints on the bottom side of the PCB, right at the mirrors, for local decoupling 3. Much simpler (voltage follower) output stage, which is significantly less prone to oscillation than the R1 output stage My experience seemed to indicate that high HFE will increase the tendency to oscillate. FWIW, I had transistors at around 400 for NPN and PNP, worked beautifully. My recommendation would be to put 400's in the input stage, and use the decoupling caps in both mirrors (100...1000nF X7R ceramic caps, size 1206 or 1210). Keep posting if the problem goes away!

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are Off Pingbacks are Off Refbacks are Off Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post hesener Group Buys 1375 19th September 2016 03:20 AM gingerpimp0069 Vendor's Bazaar 7 21st June 2007 03:07 PM Jolojl Swap Meet 7 7th December 2006 07:42 AM alexmoose Tubes / Valves 3 24th July 2006 05:37 AM Bernhard Pass Labs 3 8th August 2003 11:19 PM

 New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 01:33 PM.