Tone arm effective mass - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Source & Line > Analogue Source

Analogue Source Turntables, Tonearms, Cartridges, Phono Stages, Tuners, Tape Recorders, etc.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 18th July 2012, 03:57 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
jan.didden's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Great City of Turnhout, Belgium
Blog Entries: 7
Default Tone arm effective mass

Hi,

I was wondering about tone arm effective mass issues and how that relates to a tangential arm.
(Note that I am a meter reader not a thread tapper ;-)
In this thread: effective pick up arm mass a spreadsheet is given to calculate the effective mass both in vertical and horizontal direction for a regular tone arm, based on arm geometry, weights etc.
This is a very usefull spreadsheet which works like a charm.

But if you use a tangential arm, how do you calculate effective mass?
At any rate, since the real mass and dimensions are much, much smaller, I would expect the effective mass also to be relatively small.
How does that effect selecting a cartridge (cartridge compliance)?

thanks for any advice,

jan didden
__________________
If you don't change your beliefs, your life will be like this forever. Is that good news? - W. S. Maugham
Check out Linear Audio!
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th July 2012, 04:24 PM   #2
DF96 is online now DF96  England
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
You would still need to get the arm-cartridge resonance to sit in the gap between warps and music. I guess this would mean a particularly high compliance cartridge, but as many were too high anyway (for many popular arms) this might not be a problem.
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th July 2012, 04:39 PM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
jan.didden's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Great City of Turnhout, Belgium
Blog Entries: 7
Thanks Doug; am I correct that a radial arm (the moving sleeve or sled or whatever) would have a (much) lower effective mass than a regular tangential arm?

jan
__________________
If you don't change your beliefs, your life will be like this forever. Is that good news? - W. S. Maugham
Check out Linear Audio!

Last edited by jan.didden; 18th July 2012 at 04:44 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th July 2012, 05:13 PM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Depends on execution of tangential arm.
Air beared ones have a vertical fres comparable to a radial arm, but the hor fres would be much lower due very high bearing mass. Sometimes they 2 differnet fres hor depending on construction.
Short arms like Souther/Clearaudio the fres hor and vert are pretty much the same, here the cartridge body weight makes the difference bigger. The tuning of the fres vert can be done with additional weights and counterweights to be in the area of 11hz.
For short arms thats very important to track with warped records. warped records produce here noticable changes in speed and the brightness due the vta changes.

Last edited by Groove-T; 18th July 2012 at 05:15 PM. Reason: forgot to add a few words
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th July 2012, 05:32 PM   #5
dtut is offline dtut  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: California Central Coast
I'm a little reluctant to chime in here because I'm just not sure, but I believe the horizontal eff. mass of a tangent arm equals the mass of all the moving parts of the arm, since it translates rather than pivots, and the vertical eff. mass can be calculated and is considerably less.

Roscoe Primrose discusses arm mass in his version of the Ladegaard air bearing.

Poul Ladegaard's Air Bearing Tangential Tonearm Page

I've gotten good results from various high compliance Shure carts in a roller bearing tangent arm. Reducing mass as much as possible made a definite improvement.

Hope this is helpful.
__________________
Doug Tuthill
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th July 2012, 05:51 PM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
jan.didden's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Great City of Turnhout, Belgium
Blog Entries: 7
Thanks guys; I'm starting to get It

One implementation I was looking at is the attached, but I don't have detailed specs.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg music reference gold 1.jpg (46.3 KB, 208 views)
__________________
If you don't change your beliefs, your life will be like this forever. Is that good news? - W. S. Maugham
Check out Linear Audio!
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th July 2012, 06:15 PM   #7
kevinkr is offline kevinkr  United States
diyAudio Moderator
 
kevinkr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Blog Entries: 6
Jan,
Take a look at the Opus 3 Cantus Parallel Tracking arm thread here: Opus 3 Cantus parallel tracking arm

You might find this design of interest as well.
__________________
"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence." - Carl Sagan
  Reply With Quote
Old 19th July 2012, 05:55 PM   #8
dtut is offline dtut  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: California Central Coast
Jan,

Thanks for that link - it actually works in NeoOffice on my Mac.

What does "slider weight - the part that doesn't effect vertical eff. mass" mean? The only thing I can think of is the bearings and their housing and, with any luck, that doesn't slide.
__________________
Doug Tuthill
  Reply With Quote
Old 19th July 2012, 06:28 PM   #9
diyAudio Member
 
jan.didden's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Great City of Turnhout, Belgium
Blog Entries: 7
I think it is actually called the sleeve - it's the gold-colored sleeve in the picture that slides across the tangential arm.
It doesn't pivot of course but translates horizontally so its weight is the effective weight.

jan
__________________
If you don't change your beliefs, your life will be like this forever. Is that good news? - W. S. Maugham
Check out Linear Audio!
  Reply With Quote
Old 19th July 2012, 06:49 PM   #10
MiiB is offline MiiB  Denmark
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Denmark
one thing that strikes me on that Arm design is the placement of the horizontal pivoting axis. While the short arm may be desirable in terms of mass and flexing then the drawback is that the pivot axis must be placed quite a bit above the stylus, this this translates into speed changes on every warp on the record....

But I guess You can't win them all...
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Effective mass?? dario54 Analogue Source 6 6th August 2008 08:40 PM
40 grams effective mass arm? nghiep Analogue Source 10 25th January 2008 05:07 PM
effective mass IZHAKKATZ Analogue Source 6 6th August 2007 09:48 AM
effective pick up arm mass stewartwen Analogue Source 4 11th April 2006 06:22 PM
effective mass peterr Analogue Source 9 5th April 2002 03:52 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:34 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2