Go Back   Home > Forums > Source & Line > Analogue Source
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Analogue Source Turntables, Tonearms, Cartridges, Phono Stages, Tuners, Tape Recorders, etc.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 19th February 2006, 01:53 PM   #31
diyAudio Member
 
jackinnj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Llanddewi Brefi, NJ
Quote:
Originally posted by Onvinyl
So, anybody who can shine light on the passive riaa case I asked yesterday?
greets,
Rüdiger
Borberly descirbes the passive RIAA in Audio Amateur 4/84 and 1/85. He references articles by Jung and Marsh in those articles. Erno has many of his articles archived on his site (but I don't know if those from the 1980's are there.) www.borberlyaudio.com

Tritschler had an article on passive RIAA in AX -- October 2003 -- the acuracy is very, very good -- a pair of boards is $49 but their (Tritschler) website went off the air a few weeks ago.

In Tritschler's article he used 417a's or their equivalent (5842?)-- but their boards used 6DJ8's.
  Reply With Quote
Old 19th February 2006, 02:32 PM   #32
diyAudio Member
 
Onvinyl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Germany
Quote:
Originally posted by jackinnj


Borberly descirbes the passive RIAA in Audio Amateur 4/84 and 1/85. He references articles by Jung and Marsh in those articles. Erno has many of his articles archived on his site (but I don't know if those from the 1980's are there.) www.borberlyaudio.com

Tritschler had an article on passive RIAA in AX -- October 2003 -- the acuracy is very, very good -- a pair of boards is $49 but their (Tritschler) website went off the air a few weeks ago.

In Tritschler's article he used 417a's or their equivalent (5842?)-- but their boards used 6DJ8's.
Hi,
it's nice to answer, but, as it concerns me, I asked the question 2,5 years ago, I'm done...

Rüdiger
  Reply With Quote
Old 19th February 2006, 05:44 PM   #33
diyAudio Member
 
Pjotr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Netherlands
Hi,

If you want to simulate your circuit in PSpice you can use a Laplace source for the inverted RIAA function:

(1+tau_1*S)*(1+tau_3*S)/(1+tau_2*S)

And if you want to incorporate the 3.18 us time constant:

(1+tau_1*S)*(1+tau_3*S)/((1+tau_2*S)*(1+tau_4*S))

Both describe exactly the inverse RIAA and have a gain of 0 dB at 0 Hz.

tau_1 = 3180u
tau_2 = 318u
tau_3 = 75u
tau_4 = 3.18u

Cheers
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How to correctly use WinISD Zero D Subwoofers 18 24th April 2011 04:40 AM
Am I using Unibox correctly? zimjj Multi-Way 0 8th February 2009 12:26 AM
Any articles on how to bias correctly PRNDL Tubes / Valves 4 1st February 2008 06:39 PM
Am I using UniBox correctly? needtubes Subwoofers 3 12th June 2005 03:02 AM
Are we looking at distortion correctly? mashaffer Solid State 24 14th July 2004 04:04 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:49 PM.

Page generated in 0.08659 seconds (71.16% PHP - 28.84% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio