|Analogue Source Turntables, Tonearms, Cartridges, Phono Stages, Tuners, Tape Recorders, etc.|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
||Thread Tools||Search this Thread|
|24th April 2012, 07:58 PM||#1|
A two-stage MC tube based RIAA circuit
My 2SK240/ECC88, 6SJ7 RIAA build
As a student, I made a PAS3X clone of the Dynaco preamplifier. A simple two stage ECC83 concept, with an added buffer stage (three ECC83 sections). It is conformant to the specs, with a warm hint in the lows.
Dynaco PAS circuit.gif
The difference we (actyually my friend Peter Sikorski) had was an added output buffer of ECC83.
I used it for a few years until I bought a Yamaha CA-1000.
Around 1982 I got a subscription on the French magazine L’Audiophile, with Jean Hiraga as editor. A great guy. I made one of his implementations of the Kaneda solid state preamplifier including an RIAA section. I also made his 8W Le Monstre, my version weighted more than 30 kg’s. And I made the Le PrePre. The preamp combo was great.
But after a few years I decided to go triode again. Just for fun. But what to do? I had Hiraga’s design for a tube RIAA (roughly based on a McIntosh C22) from September 1981, but :
To the drawing board!
I decided to start the first stage with a JFET and make a cascode with a triode. I had a pair of 2SK240 at hand, with a very high Gm, and an Idss of 2,5 mA.
[Note: One cannot use two 2SK170, for sheer high Idss of 8-10 mA! Two parallel means 15 mA through the triode, making the choice difficult, and making the anode load a nightmare. As well, they have a high 300-400pF input capacitance due to Miller effect and the high 2SK170 Ciss]
So I thought the ECC88 would handle the 5 mA well of a paralleled pair of one 2SK240. The anode load is a mu stage of this triode as well, not as SRPP. This in fact worked as a marvel on the breadboard. Although the amplification was not high, the the DC working points could be balanced implying at the same time that the output impedance would be changed too . That is bad for an attached filter, but on the other hand, the output impedance can be tweaked a bit.
[build note: ECC88 pins 6/7/8 is designed as the input of a cascoded triode; the pins 1/2/3/ are used for the top of the cascode. The filament/heater differs in the two sections.]
The 2SK240 - 6SJ7-based circuit
This was my first implementation with a 2SK240 at the input.
RIAA 2SK240 - 6SJ7 v1 1987.jpg
In a next post I will give more build details.
|25th April 2012, 08:56 AM||#2|
Hybrid RIAA Design overview
The 2SK240 is a double low-noise FET. I had both FETS parallel per channel. Each has an Idss of 2,5 mA. The JFETS are directly connected to ground.
I took a small drain cap to catch any HF in the source.
The input resistance of 43 ohms is a Dale low inductive type.
I slightly raised the triode grid of the E88CC cascode section (grounded grid) a few volts (3) above ground. I used the + 12 Volts of a heater and a 7805 and some filter and trimmer.
The input circuit anode initially was an active SRPP stage, but I changed it later to a mu-stage because that way I can manage the output impedance better (trim to same both channels). This is feeding to the roll-off filter of the RIAA the 75μSec/2122 Hz filter section.
The second stage was to a steep amplification stage with a 6SJ7, a pentode that I had also used as first stage in a 10Y SET amplifier. To increase the gain I used a fixed bias, and just a small resistor (20 ohm potmeter) for balancing purpose. The 6SJ7 tube is so steep that I once saw sparks coming off the G2 pins at powering up – something I solved by adding 100 pF mica’s from G2 to K on the pins.
The anode load was made up of 2 times 2 parallel 47k resistors (Corning glass tin oxide metal film).
The bias of the 6SJ7 was based on four red LEDS in series (each 1,685 volts), filtered with a bank of solid tantale capacitors. This allowed me to set the Va slightly below the Vg2 of 120V (shunt supply using a 10W 120V zener).
After the pentode the RIAA 318μSec/500,5Hz-3180μSec/50,05Hz. I measured the output impedances of both stages (using the shunt method) and adapted the filter components.
And finally an output buffer with an ECC83. The output buffer has a forward biased diode to overcome start-up problems in the output tube (grid arcing) . Though the circuit shows a 50k cathode load, I quickly changed to an active load of the second half of the ECC83. (Some designers have used a neon instead of a diode. Might be sonically better!)
I used a separated PS box, starting from 550V (440V secondary rectified) that was outputting 400V DC with an active regulator. A bit overdone. The power supply had a 6336 as regulator tube for series regulation from the 400V to 300V. A bit big . . . But it worked.
I liked this hybrid RIAA – it works. MC low input directly to line level! Two amplification stages! Clear sound. Worked well for more than a decade.
In the past few years, I found similar designs from around 2000 of a FET/triode cascode input stage such as from OZLOESCH, using 3 paralleled FETS (2SK367) and later in 2001 Aquablue made a nice preamp with a OZloesch concept of a hybrid 2SK170/417A tube. Also take a look at A Loesch hybrid variation that discusses the use of DHT in this hybrid concept.
Next I'll discuss some improvements I made. I thought I could improve on the 6SJ7.
Last edited by triode_al; 25th April 2012 at 09:03 AM.
|15th May 2012, 02:51 PM||#3|
Second development step of my hybrid
My initial build had a double 2SK240/ECC88 cascode, then a 6SJ7 pentode.
Sounded good for years . . But
beginning 2010 I found that the sound slowly became less than I expected.
I tested the voltages and noted the input triodes were misaligned, one had 100 Va the other 30 Va and was drifting down slowly.
I rolled tubes,
Maybe the mu stage was at fault, so I changed it to a pure anode load. No improvement.
After a lot of tweaking and changing things that were not broken, I found out one of the 2SK240’s (a double FET) had gone mad. After a few minutes the Idss started to rise on both FETS of the pair, forcing the triode to conduct more and more. So I had to take that faulty thing out.
Is the hybrid cascode topology at fault?
No, the hybrid concept is very good. Silent. Fast. Low impedance.
I split the remaining 2SK240 pair over the two channels, consolidated the triode to a cascode with a 43K anode resistor. This however reduced the PSRR and increased in the background hum (power supply) a bit. It is now noticeable when there is no disc - it is at or just below the level of disc surface noise.
I also changed the output buffer of the first stage, an E88CC, as a cathode follower (Rk=13k ohms).
My 2SK240/ECC88, 6SL7 double cascode RIAA build
version 2 developed: the 6SL7 cascode-based second stage.
While I was at it, I also decided to replace the pentode and got me self a pair of 6SL7 triodes for a cascode. The 6SL7 as cascode is much steeper than the 6SJ7 pentode and has significantly lower noise floor.
I added a buffer after the 6SL7 cascode: an E88CC/E188CC cathode follower.
The sound improved a lot in transparency, better than the pentode.
Hybrid RIAA 6SL7 casc0de.jpg
The top view:
audiob RIAA L101662859.jpg
|15th May 2012, 03:17 PM||#4|
Additional background on the hybrid circuit:
see OZloesch hybrid RIAA 2SK369
OZloesch hybrid RIAA.jpg
A nice circuit; and I see we developed some ideas in parallel. I also made a tube based shunt with a TL431 in the cathode lead.
|29th May 2012, 09:01 AM||#5|
Revisiting the circuit
Version 3, May 2012
The hybrid ECC88/6SL7cascode RIAA preamp left me to do some work again.
I made an inverse RIAA.
I quickly decided to improve the PS:
|29th May 2012, 09:21 AM||#6|
RIAA and its inverse
Comments about the RIAA filter.
Because I have a new preamp (SP-6 clone) that is very very ‘clear’ in it’s sound stage, I decided to review the values. My
new SP-6 Light showed some extreme dynamics, brightness, which might imply a small clarity (presence effect) in the vinyl reproduction.
It highLights a part of the spectrum = or it is just a bonus of the line amp.
The first filter section starts with an E88C buffer.
[U]Ideal 2122 Hz filter[U] from the online calculator: 47k3 and 1585 pF. A simple RC filter.
The actual filter, first stage 2122 Hz: Because the output of the cathode follower is about 300 ohms, I had 47k/1585 pF (measured 2010) . This filter section is loaded by an Rg of 1M in the 6SL7, ideally this would be 2M2 (50* as high) to not load the filter.
calulation RIAA poles.png
The second stage filter is a classic compound and starts with an E188CC buffer stage and again here the filter input compensates for this.
The ideal 50/500 filter values : R1 = 102k9 ; C1 = 27,8 nF; R2 = 11k43.
(as measured R/L)
For R1 a 100k 0,1% is used, but I understand this overestimates the output impedance of the ECC88 buffer (something like 300 ohms??).
2010 measurements R2 = 11k42 and C1 = 27,8 nF
2012 measurements: R2 = 11k39 and C1 = 28,12 nF
→ This implies the R1 values should be increased by a small fraction (2k6) and C1 is too high.
However, as with all measurements: what to trust? The second measurements are with improved 5 1/2 digit equipment, so is better ??.
Even testing with an inverse RIAA or anti-RIAA filter made based on actual measurements of component values implies I also there fall in the measurement trap.
Check and recheck: My new 5 digit cap meter is not consistent, my old 4 digit one is.
|29th May 2012, 09:27 AM||#7|
The anti-RIAA circuit
To test the RIAA I have made an anti-RIAA circuit.
An inverse RIAA is used to test the response conformity as follows: a signal generator is connected to the input of the filter. The output of this filter is connected to the RIAA input.
A (manual) sweep in the generator will then have to result in a flat response at the end of the pick up pre-amplifier.
It can then be viewed on the scope and on a dB meter.
Of course one can simulate the actual built circuit, but I have no simulator software any more since I have a Mac .
Filter: While I was at it, I recalculated the whole circuit; measured the values of components, and found some deviations in the order of more than 0,5%. I decided I could do better and revised parts to less than 0,5%. I also added a fourth pole at 50 kHz.
2nd stage: I found out that when I loaded the preamp directly with my generator, at 1 mV in, that the second stage had little headroom, showed severe compression when stretched above 2 mV in.
This was the reason for the roll-off below 150 Hz: it just saturated at these enormous signal levels
Consequently I redesigned stage and discarded the cascode that had too little headroom - good in the listening room and actual signal levels but uneasy on the testbench. The newly dimensioned second stage is based on a SRPP and can output 30V RMS so it does not have any compression effects!
My inverse RIAA
I made two circuits; they theoretically deviate a little bit, in the order of 0,1 dB.
R3=0, R1=883k3 C1=3.6nF R2=75k C2=1nF Rload=604ohm. I use a trick: a potmeter for Rout, so I can set the total resistance to 604 ohms, including the input impedance of the MC input stage of 39 ohms. In fact this then resolves the correct loading when connected directly to the input of 39 ohms.
R3=1910 (I took 1k8 I had at hand); R1=511k C1=6.2nF R2=42k2 C2=1.8nF All except R3 within 1% measured. Load=series 536+60 ohm for -40 and -60dB test signals. I used a 560 ohm and used no extra resistor to earth; connected it directly to the 39 ohm input impedance of my FETS. This then should give the same impedance for the filter.
Background of these implementations, see, Ake Holm’s page on the inverse RIAA
Interesting is that you can see no filter is really 0,00 dB flat conform to the recording association’s standard. I note however, that paralleling two circuits like Holm’s my_filter1 and -2 would give a best implementation …
I choose the implementation by Lipshitz and refined this after looking at
the original article he wrote.
Also interesting is a
recalculated circuit by Hagerman (p5) that has a wider bandwidth than Lipshitz.
|29th May 2012, 10:39 AM||#8|
Revisiting the two stages of the circuit
The two stages of the circuit
The first stage amplifies 57 dB. Read it again: Fifty seven. I increased the source resistor from 1R8 to 10R and this dropped the amplification with 1,8 dB to 55dB. Maximum output of this stage is more than 10 volt RMS.
PU MC pre L101670354.jpg
This picture shows the output of the first stage (2SK240, ECC88 cascode) of some 21V RMS , at 3 mV in from the generator. The solid line in the middle is the reactance of the Salas shunt that was dedicated to feeding the first stage and its buffer; this trace is at 2 mV/cm.
It shows the excellent overdrive capability of the first stage.
The second SRPP stage with 6SL7 amplifies another 30 dB. This brings the sensitivity for 1 volt RMS out (0,7 V RMS is nominal 0 dB) to slightly better than 0,5 mV from a MC cartridge. Two stages from MC to line level, plus two cathode follower buffers. It works. Like a charm.
I have a low output MC element, the MC30 from Ortofon with 0,2 mV at 1000 Hz. It manages that well, full dynamics.
This circuit is a little bit low in output level, maybe 6-10 dB below 0 dB line level, so I have to turn the volume up further. But it is manageable; it is slightly better than my DAC output.
|29th May 2012, 12:58 PM||#9|
I chose a choke loading; with a 5R4 rectifier tube. My transformer is 318Volts AC, and after the 50 V drop of the rectifier and the LCLC, I still have 300V left with a 1,75 H first choke. With a load of 50-6- mA this however starts to drop to 250-240V. A bigger choke has better regulation but higher resistance, so the drop is higher.
Note the good ripple reduction of the rectifier: no peaks, pure 50 Hz that can be regulated very well. Top 1st cell, bottom second:
top 1st cell, bot 2nd cell.jpg
My SSHV: Made on a small perforated board. I use a 2SK585 for the current source, and because of the odd specs (-5V instead of -4V of the IRF6910) and other red LEDS I had to use 5 LEDS for a total of 7+ volts and a bias resistor of 68 ohm for a BIAS of roughly 56 mA.
PU MC pre L101670855.jpg
A 2SK170 with 500 ohm into a 100K wirewound resistor.
I used an IRFIB5n65a N channel 650 V mosfet for the shunt.
No signal and Salas with signal 500 Hz, 6 V pp:
Salas out 2mV:cm.jpg Salas ist stage 500Hz.jpg
Very good in fact!
After some time however my SSHV1 suffered from severe low level sub-Hz line fluctuations (low PSRR, the same problem I had in my old supply). Well I discussed this a long time in Salas’s thread.
For the moment I am not using it.
The OD3 regulator tube surprised me with its low noise and absolutely perfect regulation from the pernicious sub-Herz line changes. It outputs 153 V at 10mA bias.
The tube shows some high frequency noise (above the audible band) of 2 mV RMS. This can reduced with a small cap of 200-300 pF but not too much. Top trace EL84 shunt 50 mV/cm directly on the last cell; bottom OD3 5 mV/cm. No line residue.
top EL84, bot OD3 -20dB.jpg
I tried the OD3 tube as reference: with an EL84 as buffer, the grid connected via a low pass 330k/0,47 uF capacitor: noise as good as the Salas SSHV; and regulation equally as good, and low noise is what counts. I decided to test this for the first stage.
top EL84, with OD3 noise floor 5.jpg
The advantage: the EL84 takes several seconds to warm up, so the first stage tubes are warmed up before they are fired up.
However, the 158 volts it delivers (OD3+EL84) is too little for the first stage; I designed it for 200 V! Otherwise I loose amplification.
EL84 and TL431 regulator
I have made several versions the past years that worked well and were stable. This one is with 750 ohms input as current limiter. Bottom trace previous cell, top is the output trace. The noise frequency is quite a bit higher than the OD3 has.
The Salas however outperformed this version with ease in low noise.
I use a DC heater for all stages.
Power supply version 4, May 15
At the end I dropped this Salas shunt stage and reverted to a power supply with an EL84 as shunt. The Salas was good in the beginning but later became unstable. This is what happened on my SSHV1:
PU MC pre L101672456.jpg
New PS components: Tube reg 5R4, 7H, 4uF, then I have a 750 ohms dropper resistor, then a EL84/TL431 shunt with 30 uF MKP, at this point there is 30 mV 50Hz and no low frequency drifts. Noise floor is hardly visible on 2 mV/cm.
PU MC pre L101672157.jpg
Subsequently a source follower with a power FET with low-pass filter 220k/4 uF in the gate circuit, loaded with 4 uF and a 220 uF electrolytic on the output. All stages have a decoupling with a capacitor (4 to 5 uF MKP, with 5 ohms in series).
The Salas at 200V has a better defined space but I could for some reason not get that stable.
Last edited by triode_al; 29th May 2012 at 01:10 PM.
|29th May 2012, 01:15 PM||#10|
diyAudio Chief Moderator
Nice presentation. Uncool that your take with alternative parts reg gave weird trouble. Maybe an SSHV2 try out with standard designated parts and layout at some point.
|Thread Tools||Search this Thread|
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Tube Based AKM4396 Output Stage||benproiii||Digital Line Level||8||21st December 2011 12:36 AM|
|MC preamp input stage (BJT based) questions||jason12||Analogue Source||5||5th May 2010 06:12 PM|
|Pearl MC stage Fet/tube hybrid||cygnus x1||Analogue Source||3||4th November 2009 07:27 PM|
|Composite RIAA for tube stage||Simpleton||Analogue Source||3||11th March 2005 10:43 AM|
|12v tube output stage for cs43122 based dac?||mbcouple||Tubes / Valves||10||14th August 2004 02:47 AM|
|New To Site?||Need Help?|