|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Analogue Source Turntables, Tonearms, Cartridges, Phono Stages, Tuners, Tape Recorders, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Where the world's best tea come from:Kericho Kenya
|
Hi guys,
Am planning to build this: Linkwitz-Riley Electronic Crossover still working on the pcb layout. I am on a college budget and i have a choice of three opamps:NE5532,most expensive and is recommended for the job;TL072,cheaper than the NE;and a "4558",the cheapest option and is flooding the market,used in most electronics from china. Which will sound decent among the three without eating into my wallet?
__________________
if there are no sparks,it probably doesn't work! |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Banned
|
If you could buy all three and do a double blind, there is a fair chance that you won't be able to tell between any two more closely priced. If it was me, the NE5532 unless you have champagne tastes.
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Sweden
|
NE5532 are about 1 dollar. That's USD 7 in total.
TL072 are about 75 cents. That's USD 5 in total. "4558" are about 50 cents. That's USD 3.5 in total. I would say that the choice of OP-amps from your three candidates is one of the least of your problems. If USD 3.5 is a show stopper then the project is doomed.
__________________
UrSv Those who say it can't be done should not stop those who are doing it. |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
|
On a budget:
Use higher GainBandwidth op-amp ( more pricy ) for the two upper ones ( giving High ). Use lower GainBandwidth op-amp ( cheaper) for the other ones. High frequencies need good op amps, low frequencies don't. If I were to build a 3 way LR filter I would use one OPA2134AP ( for the High ) and three NE5532AN ( for the Mid and Low ). |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Where the world's best tea come from:Kericho Kenya
|
I need a good sounding system.If the human ear can't differentiate between a 'premium device' and an ordinary "4558",why would i go for a device which is three times more pricey?
What am asking here is the sound quality,which will sound good in this crossover?If its the 5532,i'll have no other choice but to go for it then build the power amps some other time.
__________________
if there are no sparks,it probably doesn't work! |
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
|
Quote:
BTW, are you building the suggested P05 power supply to feed your board? An extra capacitor or transistor there will bring you more SQ improvement than the difference between a 4558 and a 5532. -- Greetz, MatchASM |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Where the world's best tea come from:Kericho Kenya
|
Quote:
I already have a +/-15v supply from a pioneer receiver,but i'll look into the p05.Does anyone know the current draw of the crossover?
__________________
if there are no sparks,it probably doesn't work! |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
The TO72 is an excellent performer... it's only real limitation is limited output drive into low impedance loads.
The 4558 is not recommended these days for serious listening... use 4558's in say a CD player DAC for output buffer/and/or/ IV conversion and although it may sound good in isolation when you swap for a more modern device the difference is obvious. As ever it's hard to put into words... a good example is like imagining a £$2000 CD player and a £$30 portable CD player running through £$10'000 worth of amp and speakers. Swap the opamps in the expensive CD player and it will bring it down to the more the performance level of the portable... yet both sound good in their own right. Its when you hear the subtle differences that there's no going back if you take your music seriously. Why not use sockets and experiment. As for current draw... a 5532 pulls around 15ma compared to 3 or 4ma from memory for a TL072 or 4558.
__________________
------------------------------------------------------- A simulation free zone. Design it, build it, test it. |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Banned
|
Hey UrSv,
xeclipse is from Kenya AND a student. Things are vastly different from affluent EU and US standards of wealth and what is achievable. Even a NE5532 is not $1 in Australia; it is about $2. Suggesting to use sockets also doesn't reflect a reality that is achievable; sockets cost too. Frank |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Jeffersonville, Indiana USA
|
I swapped out ST33078 for 4558 in my disco mixer (used to play LP's at 50x gain) and there was a noticable decrease in hiss. 33078 has a noise spec closer to a 5532 than a 4558. Takes an additional 0.1 uf cap on the power supply near the IC, to prevent oscillation, so figure that into your costs. 5532 or TL072 might need the caps, too, the more slew rate the more the amp tends to oscillate. You might get some of those salvage from a dead PC switcher power supply or a radio or something.5532 has way better noise numbers than 4558, if you have speakers that can reproduce the high frequencies. If you make mistakes like input voltage too far from the middle, TL072 latches up.
I'm glad I live here, 33078 is $.38, and the ultimate audio op amp right now, LM4562 from national semi is $2.18 this week. All supplies with a minimum $7 freight for up to 5 kilos from farnell. There is no op amp stocked within 300 km of here. Look at putting your power supply in a different steel box than the op amps, helped my mixer's hum enormously. I'm using an 18 VDC wall transformer from a slot car set with two 1n5344 8.2V zeners in the op amp box to make the center signal reference ("ground").
__________________
Dynakit ST70, ST120, PAS2,Hammond H182(2 ea),H112,A100,10-82TC,Peavey CS800S,SP2-XT's, T-300 HF Projs, Steinway console, Herald RA88a mixer, Wurlitzer 4500 Last edited by indianajo; 16th April 2011 at 12:35 AM. |
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Active XO with LM3886 as opamp | xplod1236 | Chip Amps | 6 | 6th August 2007 01:18 AM |
| Opamp for active crossover | Keruskerfuerst | Parts | 2 | 7th June 2007 06:57 PM |
| Active XOVER....OPAMP or discrete....??? | Lyra | Multi-Way | 8 | 23rd March 2007 12:19 AM |
| Best Opamp for an active crossover? | ShinOBIWAN | Digital Source | 1 | 21st March 2005 03:08 AM |
| XVR1 active crossover, discrete active stage | promitheus | Pass Labs | 18 | 22nd July 2002 01:29 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11460 seconds (88.85% PHP - 11.15% MySQL) with 10 queries |