|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Analogue Source Turntables, Tonearms, Cartridges, Phono Stages, Tuners, Tape Recorders, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2010
|
I have been looking for a tube phono stage to build to pair to my DL-103, and after being given a pair of EF40 tubes, I found these:Pentode configuration.jpg
Triode 33dB configuration.jpg Triode 38dB configuration.jpg First of all, I have no experience with RIAA stuff, so for those who do, do these networks check out? Also, they all look to have high output impedance. Would adding a cathode follower be a good idea? Last, seeing as the schematics are so similar, I was thinking about putting all three in the same chassis and using a 3 position switch to move between them. Thanks in advance for any wisdom, Alex |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2010
|
Any help would be really appreciated!
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
Not what you'll want to hear, but nonetheless true: a good RIAA stage is perhaps the most tricky and difficult bit to design and build. The circuits you linked are incomplete, made for a different tube, and far from optimum. This is not a likely path to success.
The EF40 has low microphonics but relatively high noise- is that really the tube you'd want to use?
__________________
“There are no greater liars in the world than quacks, except for their patients.” - Benjamin Franklin |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2010
|
Sy, Have you used the tube? From What I understand, it is the same as the EF86 with a rimlock base, and the EF86 is a relatively well liked tube, no?
About it being incomplete, I did think they looked a bit simple, but not having any real experience with phono stages, I couldn't really tell. What is incomplete about them? |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
Well, you'd need at least one more stage and possible a buffer to bring the signal up to line level and drive volume controls or interconnects.
The characteristics of the EF40 aren't the same as EF86, but are in the ballpark. Unfortunately, the EF86 isn't very quiet either (see, for example, the measurements in Frank Bloehbaum's article in Linear Audio Vol 0). Take a look at my article on MC phono stages ("His Master's Noise")- it's perhaps not the stage you'd want to build, being rather complex, but you can get a sense of the sorts of design analysis you'll need to do. This is also covered very well in Morgan Jones's "Valve Amplifiers," and in a more qualitative way in Allen Wright's Preamp Design Cookbook.
__________________
“There are no greater liars in the world than quacks, except for their patients.” - Benjamin Franklin |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
|
My Mullard book gives the characteristics of the EF40 and EF86 as so similaras to to make no difference in practice. Noise figures are not quoted but I always understood the EF86 was the same valve in a B9A envelope. The EF40 was widely used in the late 40`s / early 50`s for low level preamps before the rush to standardise on B9A valves for signal purposes.
Two of the circuits given use the valve in Triode mode, this gives characteristics not far off an ECC82 / 12AU7 though not identical. I don`t know what this does for the noise but certainly a properly designed Triode preamp is going to be quieter than an EF40 / 86. However, given that you have the valves and the rest of the components are cheap, why not give it a go, you may like the result. As already mentioned you will need additional gain / buffering to drive most amps though. Barry |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
An old timers' trick to get better noise performance out of EF86 is to use the screen grid as the anode. It's still not as quiet as later, better tubes, but more quiet than EF86 run in pentode. As a more conventional triode (screen and plate connected), it's more linear than 12AU7/ECC82, but the gain is low and the noise is still not great.
__________________
“There are no greater liars in the world than quacks, except for their patients.” - Benjamin Franklin |
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
|
Quote:
As an aside , do you know whether the older EF37A was actually quieter than the EF40 / 86? The 1953 EMI BTR2 used them in the replay amp even though the later valves were available. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
Nope, never used an EF37.
The screen trick was unintentionally revived recently- there's an article in Linear Audio Vol 0 where that's used as the bottom tube in a hybrid cascode.
__________________
“There are no greater liars in the world than quacks, except for their patients.” - Benjamin Franklin |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2010
|
thanks for the feedback. It sounds like this might be a viable project, if only for experimentation, but only after I have some better design skills
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| MC preamp kit | Blnd2Spll | Analogue Source | 1 | 7th February 2011 01:10 AM |
| Hampton MC preamp | vacuumhead | Tubes / Valves | 2 | 11th November 2010 02:14 PM |
| Schematic - B & K MC-101 Sonata (Pro-MC-10) Preamp | dtm1962 | Solid State | 0 | 13th June 2006 07:46 PM |
| MC phono preamp | Vortex | Tubes / Valves | 29 | 29th March 2004 10:39 AM |
| MC preamp | KenP | Solid State | 2 | 17th December 2002 12:41 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10949 seconds (78.87% PHP - 21.13% MySQL) with 11 queries |