|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Analogue Source Turntables, Tonearms, Cartridges, Phono Stages, Tuners, Tape Recorders, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: San Diego
|
I am refreshing an Akai GX 77 tape playabck circuit with new coupling caps. Unlike other Akai model's circuits, this one has different values for each coupling cap. The other earlier models have 10uf except for the cap before the Radj, which is 0.47uF. Yes the transistors are different compared to the other models, but the layout is the same. Is there any reason i cannot replace them all with 10uF or 22uF? I can do like for like, but if i can improve it, why not. I cannot see why they used what they did. There is no lack of real estate there, and the new caps are genereally smaller than what was put in 25-30 years ago.
Thanks for any help. Here is the GX-77 schematic: |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
|
Larger coupling capacitors increase bass response. Too much can cause instability in some circuits. Otherwise, use what you have on hand.
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
The input impedances in both stages shown is fairly high, so smaller caps were chosen as that was all that was needed to attain the desired frequency response.
You might want to avoid increasing the values of most of these caps as the charging time constants become excessively long which can affect operating point of those stages until the caps are fully charged. Smaller electrolytics tend to have somewhat better HF and small signal performance than larger value caps. You may be able to replace these with low voltage films as well.
__________________
www.kta-hifi.net |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: San Diego
|
Hi,
Thanks, i am still learning. I had thought that bigger was better for coupling caps as it decreases the LF roll of. Guess there is too much of a good thing. i have thought about films, i think they would have to go under. i have to order anyways. |
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Coupling cap replacement in series? | TechnoBeaver | Tubes / Valves | 8 | 8th November 2010 01:33 AM |
| Polar electro with bypass cap to replace nonpolar as coupling cap? | at77 | Parts | 0 | 12th January 2010 02:05 AM |
| choosing cap values for aikido | jayme | Tubes / Valves | 2 | 25th October 2006 02:09 AM |
| Coupling cap. values??? | stoo | Tubes / Valves | 1 | 8th January 2006 04:39 AM |
| changing (de)coupling cap values | Klimon | Tubes / Valves | 14 | 25th April 2005 09:33 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.07443 seconds (71.11% PHP - 28.89% MySQL) with 11 queries |