|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Analogue Source Turntables, Tonearms, Cartridges, Phono Stages, Tuners, Tape Recorders, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
|
Hi all,
This is my first participation on this forum ! I have a project that will probably sound crazy to some of you... I am not really well versed in the audio mechanics yet, but I would like to turn an horizontal turntable into a vertical one, that I could fix to a wall. I know about the Mitsubishi LT-5V but don't really like it's design, and fancy the challenge of making it from my own hands... ![]() I've found a Beogram 5005 (with a belt-drive tangential arm) pretty cheap in a fair. It's working perfectly horizontally. Having a tangential arm seems pretty necessary if I want to turn it vertical anyway. So I feel pretty comfortable to implement the mechanism so that the vinyl sticks to the platine, centered on the axis and turns smoothly. What I not too sure yet about is will the platine's inside mechanism work if I turn it vertical ? Any ideas ? Thanks a lot for your answers... |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Los Angeles
|
Tangential arm isn't required for vertical use but spring applied tracking force relative to the deck plate is. The old Dual and Thorens turntables from the '70s worked this way and could play vertically out of the box BUT and this IS important - the platter bearings are designed for a horizontal platter so whatever you end up with will need significant engineering and fabrication to make it work vertically. Forget automatics, it's going to be manual only unless you're very determined and clever.
G² |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
|
Hi Stratus,
Thanks a lot for your answer ! Really interesting... I don't quite see a radial arm having a string applied force, and as they all seem weighted to me, I thought installing them vertically would induce some undesired forces as the arm goes its way... Hence the tangential choice. But although I like to fiddle, I don't have much experience with turntables... Could you please give me some references of Dual or Thorens turntables like the ones you're mentioning ? Do you think something like a TD 160 for instance would work vertically out of the box ? If so, I'll take care of the rest. Thanks again ! |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
49 - for the 16th time
diyAudio Member
|
Using a TT designed for horizontal playback for use as a vertical TT will present several problems - the bearings being one - anti-skating correction being another. Some of the TT's that used linear tracking arms could do both and are available from time to time on flea-bay etc. Most were regarded as mid-fi tables at best due primarily with difficulties in keeping the tone arm alignment within spec as the units aged - they could be very temperamental.
If you are attempting to save some space or reduce the effect of "foot fall" disturbance of your TT I suggest that you consider the use of a wall shelf designed for TT use - such as the one listed below. Target - VW1 Wall Mount Turntable Shelf-Audio Advisor BTW - Welcome to diyAudio!!!!
__________________
"You can't always get what you want" K. Richards/M. Jagger *** "Next time I will know some things better" Zen Mod |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Los Angeles
|
The tension on the Thorens IIRC a linear spring. I know with certainty the Dual used a spring similar to that in a clock
File:Alarm Clock Balance Wheel.jpg - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia The arm is balanced with zero force on the spring and then the spring is tightened to add the force. The center of gravity remains centered in the pivots which allows any plane of operation and makes the turntable resistant to skipping if moved / bounced. Anti skate is also not an issue (if spring applied) as the CG of the arm is centered in the pivots. I always thought a calibrated imbalance on the arm was a lazy engineers cheap way out. You want it balanced! G² |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
|
In 1966 (or so) I worked as a tech for the local Dual reps. During a trade fair we had the new 1009 run vertically for 2 weeks, 12 hours a day. No idea what happened to the bearings or what music was played! E
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Hi,
The main issue is the suspension, which simply won't cope, an arm may or may not depending on dynamic balance, and the main bearing will work at least for a bit, basically its not a good idea and a TD160 or any other subchassis turntable would be utterly hopeless. Its not a good idea unless you know exactly what you are doing. I think some technics linear trackers can be wall mounted, recommended. rgds, sreten.
__________________
There is nothing so practical as a really good theory - Ludwig Boltzmann When your only tool is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail - Abraham Maslow |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Glyfada/Athens
|
Why do this, when you can find a cheap LT and tune the hell out of it?
The LT-5V was a very clever design but with production costs in mind. See my thread on this forum for the making of my ultra LT-5V: My last turntable! There are many pointers there of how to overcome all original problems...
__________________
soundofvoid |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: OC,Calif.
|
If you put your hand on the wall and play at realistic levels you will feel way to much "sounding board drumming" . The huge surface area and the air space behind are just magnifying issues you don,t need. Put your hand on a solid turntable stand and these problems are almost non issues, except of course a 2nd story footfall problem. In that case, this might be the only solution I guess.
Regards David |
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
|
Quote:
(Pretty much all houses built in this country have brick or concrete walls, which make excellent mounting surfaces for turntables and loudspeakes)
__________________
Steerpike's Toybox |
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Vertical vs. Horizontal – does it matter? | Joshua_G | Tubes / Valves | 9 | 18th January 2010 01:17 AM |
| Horizontal or vertical? | dobias | Multi-Way | 7 | 11th August 2009 03:41 PM |
| Vertical/Horizontal 2 x JXR6 Linear Array as central speaker ? | fvaille | Full Range | 6 | 11th January 2009 10:20 PM |
| Vertical MT, horizontal woofer | fb | Multi-Way | 5 | 14th October 2008 09:55 PM |
| Horizontal vs. Vertical Alignment | Pano | Multi-Way | 2 | 12th November 2006 09:14 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.12053 seconds (78.95% PHP - 21.05% MySQL) with 11 queries |