|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Analogue Source Turntables, Tonearms, Cartridges, Phono Stages, Tuners, Tape Recorders, etc. |
|
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#11 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Ulverston in Cumbria
|
Nanook, can you explain a bit more? I would be interested in the source of these lateral vibrations and how these have a different effect depending on motor position. Is it a case that 7 7:30 is optimum but 9 o clock would be better than 11 etc?
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
|
Nanook,
I have to admit to having not given that much thought. My initial reaction is that it would be a bigger issue for some design directions than for others. For example, a light suspended subchassis design might be particularly sensitive. Noisy motors, like the commonly available steppers and (most) PMBDC types would also be prone to issues. Doesn't seem like it would be too hard to take some meaningful measurements, though. Hmmm...
__________________
"For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong." -- H.L. Mencken |
|
|
|
#13 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chinook Country.Alberta
|
if assuming that the vibrations are random and distributed evenly.
if at the "11 o'clock" position, any vibration will almost always create a much larger vibration (based on vector analysis) in the lateral direction (where it the cantilever and arm can very easily be moved) compared to the dorsal direction (in-line to the tonearm), assuming the arm pivot is firmly located. If at the "7:00 o'clock" position , assuming the pivot is firmly mounted, then the dorsal movement will be very minimal as the angle will be much smaller, therefore the magnitude of the vibration acting on the cantilever will be reduced. to me it seems intuitive. Someplace I did all the math, but lost it all in "the crash of summer 2010"
__________________
stew ☮ -"A sane man in an insane world appears insane." |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Compact Disc Motor and Turntable - Advices for Replace and Motor Service wanted | tiefbassuebertr | Digital Source | 5 | 2nd August 2010 09:19 AM |
| Lambda motor vs. XBL^2 motor vs. any other motor | Thinkcat | Subwoofers | 16 | 23rd December 2008 06:23 AM |
| 25-position switched attenuator using a pair of 5-position switches? | ray_moth | Tubes / Valves | 1 | 4th May 2008 08:02 AM |
| DIY TT: motor, motor PS, platter speed measurements | dice45 | Analogue Source | 52 | 9th May 2006 01:07 PM |
| 2 position servo/stepper motor | breguetphile | Parts | 7 | 12th September 2004 11:31 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |