How better is a Turntable compared to a CD?

[SY]

You have control on the sampling rate that is made by clock!

Yes, and that is accurate to a few dozen picoseconds (a couple of nanoseconds max for mixing boards). You may want to read through the page you linked.

 

[45]

You absolutely have control over the time down to the picosecond level. Merely repeating something incorrect does not make it correct. Likewise, your repeated denial of Shannon-Nyquist does not gather weight with repetition.

I think you have no arguments for my questions!

 

[45]

Yes, and that is accurate to a few dozen picoseconds (a couple of nanoseconds max for mixing boards). You may want to read through the page you linked.

I know what it is says. I read before posting.

 

[SY]

You had no questions that I can see, just a string of incorrect assertions.

I know what it is says. I read before posting.

Apparently without understanding it, or perhaps missing the key parts.

 

[jcx]

the signal's noise floor creates a "time smear" way above better crystal oscillator sub nanosecond jitter, dithered 16 bit CD may "only" have single digit ns time resolution

the Shannon-Hartley Channel Capacity Theorem applies to analog signals as well as digital - you simply can't get more than BW*SN bits out of any "channel" - including vinyl

and vinyl's potential ~2x higher bandwidth doesn't come close to making up for the higher noise floor

so CD noise floor advantage by itself gives more accurate audio frequency "time" detail than vinyl playback before adding in all of (orders of magnitude larger) phonograph mechanical and time varying geometry arm ,cantilever, stylus contact patch "time smearing" errors

 

[TonyTecson]

this thread and other threads like these usually go around in circles, so save your energy build something instead, this thread is closed...i will ignore all pm's concerning this thread closure....