Go Back   Home > Forums > Source & Line > Analogue Source
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Analogue Source Turntables, Tonearms, Cartridges, Phono Stages, Tuners, Tape Recorders, etc.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 29th August 2010, 08:25 AM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Ulverston in Cumbria
Default Rega MDF platter

Can anyone give me some details about the MDF platter as used by Rega on some Planars. I notice from photos that there is a recess underneath. Is this for the sub platter to fit in or is it clearance for the motor and drive belt as well? Also, is it a full 12" diameter platter? I am basing a new turntable build on Rega mechanicals and I am considering machining a new and heavier MDF platter. I just want to get an idea of how the Rega one is designed first.
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th September 2010, 09:07 PM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Kidwelly
Quote:
Originally Posted by davecooper View Post
Can anyone give me some details about the MDF platter as used by Rega on some Planars. I notice from photos that there is a recess underneath. Is this for the sub platter to fit in or is it clearance for the motor and drive belt as well? Also, is it a full 12" diameter platter? I am basing a new turntable build on Rega mechanicals and I am considering machining a new and heavier MDF platter. I just want to get an idea of how the Rega one is designed first.
Sorry this is a late reply Dave -the recess is to clear the motor and belt too.


John R.
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th September 2010, 01:43 AM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
bear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: New York State USA
MDF is a problematic material for things that need dimensional stability over time.

Moisture causes it to "grow" in one dimension (thickness) more than the other. I don't know of a way to prevent that completely.

Rega probably sealed the MDF (I would expect) in a coating or paint...

Just a heads up...

_-_-bear
__________________
_-_-bear
http://www.bearlabs.com ...ur feeback please - like/dislike my what I have written? PM/email tnx. --
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th September 2010, 02:41 AM   #4
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
 
planet10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Victoria, BC, NA, Sol III
Blog Entries: 4
If you are going to machine a new platter, use corian... a number of us here with such platters.

dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi
p10-hifi forum here at diyA
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th September 2010, 01:24 PM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Kidwelly
Quote:
Originally Posted by bear View Post
MDF is a problematic material for things that need dimensional stability over time.

Moisture causes it to "grow" in one dimension (thickness) more than the other. I don't know of a way to prevent that completely.

Rega probably sealed the MDF (I would expect) in a coating or paint...

Just a heads up...

_-_-bear

MDF is available in various grades including moisture resistant, alternatively you can seal commercial (diy) grades yourself with a suitable sealer available from diy stores.

We've had great success with mdf which is used in our "Sole" sub-chassis for the Linn LP12. However, mdf in this application is used as a damping layer which is sandwiched between two sheets of aluminum. Results of damping factor tests on our sub-chassis casn be found on the audioqalia website here.. Home - Audio qualia

I dare say Rega sealed and painted their mass loaded Planar 2 mdf platter.

John R
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th September 2010, 05:23 PM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Ulverston in Cumbria
Thanks for the replies. I am beginning to move away from the idea of MDF, due in part to the drawbacks you have all mentioned. However, the Corian option is an interesting one and I may look at this seriously. What I am proposing to build is a classic looking turntable with a deep platter and 60's Audio Technica arm but using more modern underpinnings that are easily available and replaceable. This is why the idea of the Rega machanicals was considered but unlike the Rega however, I am planning a suspended sub chassis.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th September 2010, 11:23 PM   #7
Toaster is offline Toaster  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: South East England
That may not be the best move Dave. After hearing the Rock and the Roksan Xerxes in the '80s and preferring both- in different ways- to the Linn I had at the time, I experimented with a Thorens TD 160 I'd taken to bits and found it sounded better without the springs. It's at least partly a matter of taste, and the sound became less spacious, but the bass seemed tighter and it just sounded more 'together' musically. My suspicion that suspended decks had problems were triggered by watching a friend's Rega 3 in action, oddly enough. Not a suspended deck, but the motor seemed to be in constant motion on it's suspension/ decoupling belt. It struck me then that this must be doing strange things to the speed stability, which seemed to explain the odd bass quality of these decks. Suspended subchassis decks have a similar problem it seems to me, except in the rare cases where the motor is deemed quiet enough to put on the subchassis (Pink Triangle Anniversary) or those that have highly damped suspensions (recent Rock turntables and the SME 20 and 30 series). Just recently I modified the same Systemdek I mentioned on your AT cartridge thread from springs to using sorbothane 'blobs' in their place. Again, to my taste, much better. This was one of the original 'Transcription' decks, later versions of which were known as the 'III'. They are well known for powerful but rather soft bass, but removing the springs completely sorted this out. Slightly less spacious and less bass quantity, but better quality ad a better focused sound. I should point out that all the modified decks were either used on wall shelves or stands on solid concrete floors. All that said, if you prefer sprung turntables, go for it, but you might find it's bunch of effort for worse sound!
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FS: Rega p2/p3 sub platter - bearing diy turntable dhole Swap Meet 0 13th October 2009 08:50 AM
rega p3 platter on a p1? jicas Analogue Source 8 17th January 2008 02:57 PM
Rega Planar 3 Acrylic Platter Drawings guglielmope Analogue Source 1 15th April 2006 10:40 PM
Rega sub platter assembly joeling39 Analogue Source 1 12th August 2004 01:04 PM
MDF/Sand/MDF cabinet details Petter Multi-Way 25 16th April 2002 02:10 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:00 PM.

Page generated in 0.10140 seconds (76.61% PHP - 23.39% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio