Go Back   Home > Forums > Source & Line > Analogue Source
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Analogue Source Turntables, Tonearms, Cartridges, Phono Stages, Tuners, Tape Recorders, etc.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 30th June 2010, 04:23 AM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Default cap coupled phono input?

Recently started using a old Linn LK-1 preamp - amongst a number of design features that are either interesting or bizarre -( your choice) both MC and MM inputs are capacitor coupled - why'd they configure it that way ?
Amongst other things - this would seem to make loading down MM carts by simply using the y-plug and parallel resistor technique ineffective ?
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th June 2010, 04:38 AM   #2
Salas is offline Salas  Greece
diyAudio Chief Moderator
 
Salas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Athens-Greece
They use BJT head amp probably and maybe there is significant input offset danger in their design (especially for production run, not lab matched and trimmed input section parameters) to create enough current through the carts. AC loading impedance remains unaffected.
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th June 2010, 05:09 PM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Default 47kOhm plus 47kOhm= 23.5 ?

If I understand this correctly (which implies I understand it at all -clearly not the case)- then adding 47kOhm via external Y-plug across the existing 47kOhm MM section will still yield 23.5 kOhm - the input coupling cap won't make any difference in this ?
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th June 2010, 05:38 PM   #4
Salas is offline Salas  Greece
diyAudio Chief Moderator
 
Salas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Athens-Greece
Will only remain 47K for DC and it will halve for AC. Music is AC. But I would do that inside, soldering the extra resistor on top of the original load resistor for quality reasons anyway. The distance's inductance for the resistor combo will make Y a poor & subjectively misleading choice.

P.S. Have a check it is 47k internally and not 100k, because I just saw a 1989 review that Stereophile's Atkinson had found 100k for MM, 220R for MC and 100k for line despite the published specs. He also confirms it is BJT input with an LM358 DC servo around a cascode dif head amp with tantalum(!) input caps most likely for MC, but thankfully polycarbonate for MM in your case.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Balanced input all DC coupled RIAA preamp FdW Analogue Source 82 5th February 2012 06:22 PM
6T9 push pull with Cathode Coupled input Brit01 Tubes / Valves 5 18th January 2009 11:58 AM
Transparent, Non-Microphonic Input Cap for Phono Preamp? thermionic Solid State 7 31st July 2008 09:17 PM
Simple Cap-Coupled CF Advise Needed dr._sleep Tubes / Valves 6 10th August 2005 06:50 PM
Resistor-Input vs. Choke-Input vs. Cap.Multip. Blitz Pass Labs 13 26th September 2003 04:59 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 05:23 PM.

Page generated in 0.08679 seconds (71.34% PHP - 28.66% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio