Go Back   Home > Forums > Source & Line > Analogue Source
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Analogue Source Turntables, Tonearms, Cartridges, Phono Stages, Tuners, Tape Recorders, etc.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 30th January 2010, 11:33 PM   #31
hdjii is offline hdjii  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Northern Virginia
Bear - Thanks for the input. I guess I have nothing to lose by trying it.

planet10 - What would you recommend for a cartridge in the same price range?

Howrd
  Reply With Quote
Old 31st January 2010, 02:12 AM   #32
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
 
planet10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Victoria, BC, NA, Sol III
Blog Entries: 4
Something that works with a low mass arm. When we were selling these (100s) we put a lot of Grados on them. Grace F9 and Nagaokos worked well. I have a Garrott P77 i'll likely put on mine.

dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi
p10-hifi forum here at diyA
  Reply With Quote
Old 31st January 2010, 10:15 AM   #33
oshifis is offline oshifis  Hungary
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Budapest, Hungary
Quote:
Originally Posted by planet10 View Post
A DL103 is not the best match for a Mayware.

dave
I use exactly the same combination (on a Thorens TD-160 Super). Is this combination not recommended because of the low compliance of the cartridge combined with the low effective mass of the arm? In other words, the resonace of the two is too high? I measured the resonance with the HFN&RR test disc, and it is around 14 Hz.

Or the unipivot principle or the thin wall of the arm is the problem? The low effective mass can be increased by using a piece of flat lead sheet between the headshell and the cartridge (which is quite heavy by itself).
  Reply With Quote
Old 31st January 2010, 11:23 AM   #34
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
You can shim between the front of the cart and headshell to get the pivot point lower.

John C.
  Reply With Quote
Old 31st January 2010, 09:01 PM   #35
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
 
planet10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Victoria, BC, NA, Sol III
Blog Entries: 4
Quote:
Originally Posted by oshifis View Post
Is this combination not recommended because of the low compliance of the cartridge combined with the low effective mass of the arm? In other words, the resonace of the two is too high? I measured the resonance with the HFN&RR test disc, and it is around 14 Hz.
Yes. Isn't 14 hz a bit on the high side?

dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi
p10-hifi forum here at diyA
  Reply With Quote
Old 31st January 2010, 09:09 PM   #36
kevinkr is offline kevinkr  United States
diyAudio Moderator
 
kevinkr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Blog Entries: 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by planet10 View Post
Yes. Isn't 14 hz a bit on the high side?

dave
My take on it too.. Something between 6 - 10Hz is usually considered acceptable IIRC.
__________________
www.kta-hifi.net
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st February 2010, 10:13 AM   #37
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Ok, so let me bring you up to date a little on developments... is this the kind of forum where we can admit stupid mistakes? I hope so! I'm feeling a little sheepish...

So I got a little impatient when I got home and decided to see what might happen if I just applied a little manual pressure to the headshell. Just enough so see if it might bend. What could possible go wrong? Of course it snapped clean off... Sigh.

So then I got to thinking - I have other headshells - even if it's just temporary, I can try a different one out. Of course I knew that the diameter of the arm tube would be a problem as it's pretty thin. So I sawed off the end of the original headshell and machined it into a shim (sort of collar) so that I could fit a Sumiko headshell that I'd bought (originally to attach to the SME 3009 I have).

It took me a while to get it all set up. It's considerably longer than the original headshell and it's not angled correctly, so I knew it would have to be a bit of a bodge. Still, nothing ventured, nothing gained! I had to mount it a little way down the arm and I could only fix the cartridge with one screw due to the angle it needs to sit at in the headshell (did I say it was a bodge? )

I tried a few different setups and quickly realized that the movable weight would need to be the whole way back down the arm to reduce the effective mass at the headshell, given that this headshell already weighs 12g.

Click the image to open in full size.

The overall effect is extremely interesting. Unsurprisingly, it has changed the character of the arm completely. Previously, it had an astonishingly fluid and transparent midrange which had me completely sold. It was slightly light on bass response and occasionally sounded a little uncontrolled, but it was very involving with a superb soundstage. With the heavier headshell, the bass response has improved dramatically, but at the expense of midrange detail. It sounds much more controlled than it did which is still exciting, but in a different way... less immediately impressive, but probably better balanced overall.

Once thing is for sure, it's tracking the inner grooves SO much better now - I suspect that this is more likely due to the fact that the arm is sitting horizontal now.

Click the image to open in full size.

Click the image to open in full size.

I'm going to live with this setup for a while and see how I feel about it. It definitely looks a little odd, but I'm prepared to live with that, at least for now.

Click the image to open in full size.
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st February 2010, 02:21 PM   #38
diyAudio Member
 
bear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: New York State USA
Does it really weigh that much more than the stock?

How about a good couple of pix of the broken one?

Maybe you can do the kludge repair that I suggested earlier, whereby you replace the center section of the bent headshell?? I would go for that...

Btw, another material of interest for this repair would be fiberglass PCB material... it can be epoxied, cut, sawed and drilled, sanded too and painted...

_-_-bear
__________________
_-_-bear
http://www.bearlabs.com ...ur feeback please - like/dislike my what I have written? PM/email tnx. --
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st February 2010, 06:19 PM   #39
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Hi Bear,

The headshell is of no further use as I chopped it up to make the collar for the Sumiko. The Sumiko is significantly heavier than the old one - in fact, the combination of headshell and cartridge is close on 20g. You can see I have the counterweight and collar weight both all the way back to counterbalance it.

I've been experimenting with this setup all day (whilst also working from home, of course ) and oh MAN has it responded to tweaking. The heavier, more rigid headshell is clearly making the stylus work harder and is transmitting less resonance through the arm. Reducing the amount of silicone damping has allowed it to open up again and compensate somewhat. The bass response with the heavier headshell is like night and day - the kick drum sound on the White Stripes is huge - the double bass on the Iron and Wine album I'm listening to really warm and rich.

It's funny just how subjective this stuff all is. I've been experimenting with setups now for the best part of 10 years - it's always fun to read people's opinions of what works with what - but nothing beats the sense of achievement of finding something that just sounds "right"... even if it looks a bit stupid

So I'm sticking with this for now. It is working very nicely indeed.

Ben
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th February 2010, 01:06 PM   #40
diyAudio Member
 
bear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: New York State USA
Yes, Watson, another case solved!!

An idea might be to lighten the headshell you have now by drilling along the length and judiciously filing back at the part where it holds the part that goes into the arm wand...
Might be worth 15-20% of the added mass... you can always put mass back via lead or another metal...

Also, consider making another counterweight so that it can sit closer to the pivot.

_-_-bear
__________________
_-_-bear
http://www.bearlabs.com ...ur feeback please - like/dislike my what I have written? PM/email tnx. --
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FS:tonearm Mayware/Sonus Formula 4 new in box guglielmope Swap Meet 8 28th April 2012 06:49 AM
Mayware Formula 4 Uni-Pivot arm peted Analogue Source 54 22nd March 2012 07:25 AM
Bent woodwork Tip Tenson Multi-Way 36 9th June 2008 06:17 AM
Mayware / JH Labs tonearm problem Stanislav Analogue Source 12 12th January 2007 06:08 AM
what can I do to a bent tone arm audio3chung Analogue Source 15 18th October 2006 01:38 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:30 AM.

Page generated in 0.13089 seconds (78.09% PHP - 21.91% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio