|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Analogue Source Turntables, Tonearms, Cartridges, Phono Stages, Tuners, Tape Recorders, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#321 |
|
Account disabled at member's request
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Toronto
|
Here's the HPS4.1 current noise plot. Unfortunately the RIAA correction is already installed, so the increase of the current noise with frequency is masked by the RIAA gain drop at high frequencies.
Anyway, the equivalent input current noise @1KHz is about 5pA/rtHz. This maps to a negligible current noise contribution to the total noise, for a 10-20ohm MC. However, for a MM cartridge having 500ohm, the current noise contribution is 2.5nV/rtHz, which adds to the 0.3nV/rtHz input voltage noise and the 2.8nV/rtHz cartridge noise. This clearly shows that HPS4.1 is not recommended for MM cartridges. OTOH, using something of the HPS4.1 complexity for a MM cartridge doesn't make much sense anyway. A simple, low noise JFET construction with a gain of 40dB (like HPS2.0) will do just fine.
|
|
|
|
|
#322 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
|
I agree and when i find the time i will do a stage for the grados.
|
|
|
|
|
#323 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Thanks, I was looking at the new 2 Ohm 2 mH Grados and it would seem difficult to take complete advantage of its noise floor. Your Benz at 12 Ohms and .4mH puts the trade off far out in frequency.
__________________
2012, our time is running out. Last edited by scott wurcer; 20th December 2009 at 07:16 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#324 |
|
Account disabled at member's request
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Toronto
|
Yep, the new Grado is quite a strange MM animal. Can't imagine how they got to 2ohm and 2mH, that sounds pretty odd to me.
|
|
|
|
|
#325 |
|
Account disabled at member's request
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Toronto
|
I have decided to do a PCB for the raw power supply (rather than using perf board and wiring). See the attached pictures.
Testing went very well, 0.28-0.3nV/rtHz and 0.008% distortions at all frequencies and output levels up to 40Vpp. I also got only 25uV output hum (input shorted), before even throwing everything in the steel case. This is an excellent level, equivalent to 2.5nV input hum. It's actually a little better than HPS3.1 in the same stage (before case), probably because of a better layout of the input stage. But the key to low hum is the dual mono construction and the ground loop(s) handling, as described on my web site under "wiring". ![]()
Last edited by syn08; 24th December 2009 at 06:22 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#326 |
|
Account disabled at member's request
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Toronto
|
|
|
|
|
|
#327 |
|
Account disabled at member's request
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Toronto
|
http://www.synaesthesia.ca the Low Noise Designs part was updated with HPS4.1 schematics, Gerbers, comments, etc... Measurements to follow ASAP (they were mostly posted here, anyway).
Comments welcomed, as usual. |
|
|
|
|
#328 |
|
Account disabled at member's request
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Toronto
|
http://www.synaesthesia.ca the Low Noise Measurements page was updated with the HPS 4.1 measurements.
Currently, continuing the listening tests. So far, I was able to identify two significant differences to HPS 3.1: low level resolution/imaging and the vinyl noise handling. Compared to HPS 3.1, I like better HPS 4.1 at low listening levels. It seems to have better resolution/imaging. With HPS 3.1 I can't resist turning up the volume ![]() Pops are, to me, better handled by HPS 3.1. The entire vinyl noise appears more distinctly in HPS 4.1. HPS 3.1 has a more "soothing" effect on the vinyl noise. I guess it's related to the head amp pulse response (less overshooting in HPS 3.1) because this changes with the MC capacitive loading. 47Kohm/220pF is HPS 3.1 is audibly equivalent to 47Kohm/470pF in HPS 4.1. But also switching both to 100ohm input impedance levels the field?! I'll invite a few friends to capture their opinions as well, then I'll draw the conclusions of this exercise. HPS 5.0 will be a new generation of Peltier cooled devices... Last edited by syn08; 30th December 2009 at 07:24 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#329 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
|
exiting ! You start to listen ! canīt wait to see the "cool" one. I look if i can find some gallium transistors.
|
|
|
|
|
#330 |
|
Account disabled at member's request
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Toronto
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| All DHT Phono Stage | Steve Cresswell | Tubes / Valves | 20 | 31st July 2009 05:03 PM |
| DIY phono to replace roksan phono stage | seroxatmad | Analog Line Level | 6 | 14th December 2008 05:46 PM |
| new phono stage or old preamp with phono? | flohmann | Analog Line Level | 2 | 2nd October 2008 09:51 PM |
| Should I replace Scott 222C phono stage with Claret phono stage? | Bing Yang | Analogue Source | 0 | 22nd August 2005 06:41 AM |
| Phono Stage | ruangrit | Analogue Source | 1 | 11th October 2003 10:13 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.19572 seconds (50.23% PHP - 49.77% MySQL) with 11 queries |