Mpp - Page 808 - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Source & Line > Analogue Source

Analogue Source Turntables, Tonearms, Cartridges, Phono Stages, Tuners, Tape Recorders, etc.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11th December 2012, 09:35 PM   #8071
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joachim Gerhard View Post
Your circuit idea drawn up comes soon. It is immensely workable. Hats off.
.. and wallet open please ..
No, nobody will pay me for that cause I am not a highly paid Electrical Engineer .

Indeed it's an old hat as we say, remember our examination in "Impulstechnik" in
Paderborn (Prof. Nowack from Bochum) some 30 years ago. Evaluation of a circuit
like that in your post 8063

Mpp

without the npn was part of the questions. Nothing new under the sun.

Last edited by as_audio; 11th December 2012 at 09:40 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th December 2012, 09:40 PM   #8072
diyAudio Member
 
Joachim Gerhard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Look at the little drawing. That buffer is decent and can be improved on.
Sure, if we go under the audible threshold with distortion, noise and bandwidth one PN junction less may sound better. I always look at it as a very bad capacitor.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th December 2012, 09:43 PM   #8073
diyAudio Member
 
Joachim Gerhard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Do not wory, a friend of mine is working to bring out the MPP thread as a book.
The title is " Book of Thread".
That will make us rich, no question (:
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th December 2012, 09:48 PM   #8074
diyAudio Member
 
Joachim Gerhard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
That study in Paderborn was "Hard Bread" as we say here. Somehow in the back of my mind it must have being ringing a bell.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th December 2012, 09:54 PM   #8075
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joachim Gerhard View Post
That study in Paderborn was "Hard Bread" as we say here. Somehow in the back of my mind it must have being ringing a bell.
I am pretty sure I only remember this exam question, because I did not see the cascode at the time and was consequently downgraded. And so my long folded cascode journey started.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th December 2012, 09:55 PM   #8076
diyAudio Member
 
Joachim Gerhard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Of cause the PNP BJT in the folded cascode has the same purpose of reducing the input capacitance of the J-Fet array BUT with the additional series cascode we can run the J-Fets
on lower voltage, that reduces gate current plus heating and that reduces noise. We also can run that cascode on quite high voltage ( provided we are under the avalanche voltage of the BJT that is another source of noise ) so we have more dynamic range.
I am undecided on this .
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th December 2012, 09:58 PM   #8077
diyAudio Member
 
Joachim Gerhard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
I did not realize that this is a cascode back then. Folding the cascode was VERY exotic in the 70th. Maybe only John Curl new it since the 60th (:
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th December 2012, 10:01 PM   #8078
diyAudio Member
 
Stefanoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: italia - ora USA -WI
ok I have spectacular news for everybody.
I modeled the circuit, we can get the required gain (hopefully same applied in practice).
Also same exact capacitors and value for the RIAA I gave away in these pages can be used to have same exact precision had on Paradise.
Noise wise we are on the good side.
so now the circuit looks very, very promising which means that all the people who took part to the GB will be able to use the same capacitors to build this one too.

EDIT: Output is still out of phase with the input, which is still not a big deal anyway, but I jsut wanted to correct my previous statement.
__________________
Stefano

Last edited by Stefanoo; 11th December 2012 at 10:25 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th December 2012, 10:38 PM   #8079
diyAudio Member
 
Stefanoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: italia - ora USA -WI
and here is the circuit for the joy of everybody.
Unfortunately I won't be able to do much work in the next days as I want want to work on the new linestage design I am helping out with a very regarded user if this forum.
I like to work on both but unfortunately it is impossible...so here is my contribute for now.

Here we go fully simulated and apparantely working (The resistors still need tweaking to get absolute precision)
Attached Files
File Type: pdf BasicIdea Rev2.pdf (35.8 KB, 88 views)
__________________
Stefano
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th December 2012, 11:37 PM   #8080
diyAudio Member
 
Joachim Gerhard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Plus - minus 45 V.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 05:49 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2