|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Analogue Source Turntables, Tonearms, Cartridges, Phono Stages, Tuners, Tape Recorders, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#7491 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Guys. This isn't what we talked about. We want transformer - rectifier - cap - choke - cap.
__________________
Best regards: Holger www.holgerbarske.com - Deutschsprachiges Paradise-Support-Forum |
|
|
|
|
|
#7492 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Joachim you have mail
|
|
|
|
|
#7493 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Holger, Algar designed the pre regulator for the pre regulator so to say. I posted in 7490 that i will add chokes and caps.
|
|
|
|
|
#7494 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I think the use of the common mode chokes is correct in this design but for ripple rejection we need the bigger sized stuff from Hammond or Lundahl. Those can be put behind Algars
PCB or could be integrated in a bigger PCB. |
|
|
|
|
#7495 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Wasit not traffo - common mode coke - rectifier - cap - coke - cap ?
Last edited by Bksabath; 6th October 2012 at 08:11 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#7496 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Obrenovac,Serbia
|
Why not use John Curl topology? He attached it in another thread.
|
|
|
|
|
#7497 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
The common mode chokes suppress only HF/RF. For ripple rejection and smoothing we need big coils that work in the audio range.
|
|
|
|
|
#7498 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Denmark
|
To me theres no need to target ripple rejection.. HF is the primary.....
The Paradise has extreme ripple rejection.... all is effective shielded by high impedance current-sources/mirrors. poison is the Hf, that can bleed through stray capacitance. Curls schematic seems rather fine to me or at least a good start. ut no need for the LM's as the Shunt is already onboard..:9 Last edited by MiiB; 6th October 2012 at 12:43 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#7499 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I agree, there is no need for extreme pre regulation but it may be fun. Some may hear a difference, some not, one never knows.
|
|
|
|
|
#7500 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Sorry that to me is straight LM317 and a common mode coke classic straight out of book
Why do we have to put a name on it? In other words.... Besides one may need to step back and see all the work FDW did on the suply before mentioning LM317 Last edited by Bksabath; 6th October 2012 at 11:44 PM. |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
| New To Site? | Need Help? |