Mpp - Page 655 - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Source & Line > Analogue Source

Analogue Source Turntables, Tonearms, Cartridges, Phono Stages, Tuners, Tape Recorders, etc.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 3rd August 2012, 08:37 AM   #6541
hesener is offline hesener  Germany
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Munich, Germany
Quote:
Originally Posted by beetle View Post
What do you use to measure such tight tollerances? Or do you just match the chanels?
I used a LCR meter, some older device from HP whose number escapes me right now. I bought it at the ETF 2011, an it works just beautifully. I measured the capacitors that went in there, and combined them with additional small caps to achieve the exact value from the schematic. Yes, I rely on this LCR meter to claim the 0.1%, which is only true if that meter is that precise. But the two channels do match to each other that well. (And I calibrated my meter with another meter that just went through calibration....)

RIAA precision is a different thing. The caps and resistors need to be precise (what I tried to achieve), but as Joachim pointed out the other impedances in the circuit do play a role as well. The Paradise circuit tries to minimize these as much as possible, and as we have seen from Stefanoo's simulations the results are very close. What we are still missing is an actual measurement, using a anti-RIAA circuit, to find out if that is true.

But that raises the question, how precise can that be, when your components are 0.1% or so? This can be calculated (don'T forget the precision of the signal generator), only I haven't done it.... I think Joachim made that estimation in his FPS article....
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd August 2012, 09:02 AM   #6542
Salas is offline Salas  Greece
diyAudio Chief Moderator
 
Salas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Athens-Greece
Its the outcome that counts. So most practical is to measure curves since this circuit responds to impedance division against the filtering components. Without an inverse Riaa feed-through for flat, we can always take the filtered curve and then compare it against the textbook Riaa curve. Here is one FFT of a tube phono that way. And there is no anti-Riaa circuit tolerance creeping in.
Attached Images
File Type: gif ValveItchRiaaCurve.gif (19.8 KB, 274 views)
File Type: jpg Riaa.jpg (30.6 KB, 273 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd August 2012, 12:07 PM   #6543
diyAudio Member
 
Joachim Gerhard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
I have measured the new Pardise with an Anti RIIA and have posted the results. With the value that MiiB has chosen we get 0.75dB plus at 20Hz and 0.25dB plus at 20kHz. In a broad range between 300Hz and 10kHz the response is flat so we have a very slight loudness character. With Stefanos and Ricardos values the response will be flatter.
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd August 2012, 12:20 PM   #6544
Salas is offline Salas  Greece
diyAudio Chief Moderator
 
Salas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Athens-Greece
Will the impedance of the mirrors vary somewhat due to various parameters in every each one of them built?
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd August 2012, 12:27 PM   #6545
diyAudio Member
 
Joachim Gerhard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Not much but 0.1% is optimistic. 1% gives a precision of slightly worse then plus-minus 0.1dB. For me that is good enough provided that the channels match.
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd August 2012, 01:05 PM   #6546
diyAudio Member
 
jacco vermeulen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: At the sea front, Rotterdam or Curaçao
Send a message via Yahoo to jacco vermeulen
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joachim Gerhard View Post
For me that is good enough provided that the channels match.
By 0.2dB ? (0.172)
__________________
The buck stops Here
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd August 2012, 01:27 PM   #6547
diyAudio Member
 
Joachim Gerhard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
With a scope that has two channels and a mathematics function it is quite easy to check if the channels are similar-
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd August 2012, 01:57 PM   #6548
diyAudio Member
 
Stefanoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: italia - ora USA -WI
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joachim Gerhard View Post
With a scope that has two channels and a mathematics function it is quite easy to check if the channels are similar-
Scope usually has a vertical accuracy of 5%.
What I have is a precision 5 1/2 digit Fluke meter and created a reference file with the RIAA using top level HP Meter I had access to for a couple of months.
Then I play the file and measure the output with my Fluke and record the variation and plot it vs. Frequency.
That as proven to be accurate to 0.05dB.

When I get the board I will be able to make reference measurements for all the community here and I will share the results with all of you.
__________________
Stefano
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd August 2012, 02:32 PM   #6549
diyAudio Member
 
jacco vermeulen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: At the sea front, Rotterdam or Curaçao
Send a message via Yahoo to jacco vermeulen
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stefanoo View Post
What I have is a precision 5 1/2 digit Fluke meter
A 5 1/2 digit LCR meter doesn't automatically have a 0.05% accuracy.
Basic accuracy of 0.05% doesn't automatically mean the measurement will be 0.05% accurate.

Capacitors have three parameters, i'd advise you to read an introduction to precise LCR meters, e.g. from Agilent, Wayne Kerr.

(me have a Philips 6340C with 0.05% basic accuracy, took me a course to manage to measure to that level)
__________________
The buck stops Here
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd August 2012, 03:28 PM   #6550
diyAudio Member
 
Stefanoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: italia - ora USA -WI
I meant the reference file I have created has an accuracy under 0.05%.
I created with the topo of the line Agilent meter.

I play the file at a level that will set a good spot for the meter thus allowing it to go down to 0.1% or better.
I got the idea of creating the reference file after going through a lot of pain in trying to measure the RIAA for another project I was developing and I was using an excel spreadsheet with a lot of formula to calculate the accuracy.
The process was really elaborate and I had to come out with a better and faster way but yet precise and that is when I got this idea.

Obviously playing the file also works if you have a flat soundcard to play with and my EMU 0204 is very good for this purpose and that is why I specifically choose this model sa it has a very flat frequency response.

I would recommend this method, it will be very straightforward to plot the frequency response.


Edit: I will definitely read the material you outlined
__________________
Stefano
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 07:53 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2