|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Analogue Source Turntables, Tonearms, Cartridges, Phono Stages, Tuners, Tape Recorders, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
| View Poll Results: well, do MC carts sound better than MM ones? | |||
| yep |
|
52 | 69.33% |
| nope |
|
23 | 30.67% |
| Voters: 75. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Ireland
|
Well, punk, do they?
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
|
Yes, as a generalization assumming that ancillaries are up to the task.
dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com, frugal-phile.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi p10-hifi forum here at diyA |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
It depends. The best magnetic cart I ever had was a Technics MM. But several MCs that have gone through my living room have also been excellent. So, I can't really generalize.
Best-best cartridges ever weren't magnetic- think Panasonic strain gauge and Weathers FM.
__________________
If there's a sucker born every minute, where do the rest of them come from? |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Sofia
|
It depends a lot on your music and sound preferences. I can't imagine any MM beating a good MC on classical but with rock music MCs are often too polite and lacking a real kick. As i haven't heard a MM cart for at least 20 years, things may have changed.
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Scottish Borders - Kelso; on the famous Tweed River!
|
Being old enough to have had many cartridges through my experience I will say that the MMs I tried - and lived with over many years - included the ADC 25 and 26. These were actually stupid cartridges which were so compliant that they tracked best at under 1 gram. However they jumped around on anything other than the flattest of records and one well known record shop refused to sell me records as I too often returned them as unplayable! BUT when all was well these MMs back then sounded as good as was possible.
I also tried Decca cartridges but although extremely dynamic I found that they had a tiring relentless quality and moved on to MCs. Again I had many of these, but have two favorites (still). One is an early SPU/e Ortofon and thye other is an original Kondo Audionote Io (with elliptical stylus). Both are troublesome as they need a lot of step-up and also they can be nowhere near their best potential in a less than perfect arm. If the bearings are not absolutely right both will shake them to bits! These cartridges produce a lot of energy. Other than the homemade arm I use now, the old SS FR64s or 66s have proven to be the best for purpose. I have not heard many of todays good MCs but those I have heard seem to be too sterile for my liking. They do not in my experience produce the type of sound I like. If I were to have to buy a cartridge within the next few months I would buy an old SPU and have it rebuilt by the Expert Stylus Company here in the UK. THey specialize in this particular cartridge and, having heard a recent sample of their work, I can only say that they do a world class job. For UK £600-700 (total) you get an equivalent to a cartridge retailing at triple that figure. I have had many others but the above are the ones which are at the top of the pile for me. All of the views above are also fully valid. THe Technics - I think it was a 305 or some similar number - was a glorious MM when fitted with the top stylus. Last edited by brianco; 29th September 2009 at 12:56 PM. |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
DIY !
diyAudio Member
|
Impossible question...without a price-range.
No MM will beat a Dyna XX2 in a good arm/drive. But this is more than twice as expensive as any MM Arne K
__________________
Ars longa, vita brevis |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chinook Country.Alberta
|
'cause we all know moving Irons sound the best
![]() Seriously, I have had great success with the moving Irons from Grado.
__________________
stew ☮ -"A sane man in an insane world appears insane." |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Chief Moderator
|
I think that much of that sterile character is down to phono stages. Only little noise from their regs and a Riaa filter not taking into account how an MC measures on an actual test record, just all nice and textbook, can push it too far along with the high gain needed. It takes a ''fizzy'' quality. To the contrary, MM by being naturally subdued in the highs and 18dBV stronger as a generator in average, can come across tamer and limp. Alas, enough info is lost. Of course, correct tone comes first in order to appreciate any info. Else its a drill on endurance to shrill.
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Burlington
|
I worked in a Hi-Fi store for too long. Grados are okay, but only the gold or silver, don't pay any much more for an elliptical tip. A good FG or Fine Line makes a huge difference, surface noise seems to drop big time with more exotic tip geometries.
I dealt with clearaudio, sumiko, ortofon, Benz Micro, Dynavector and a couple others. The best I've heard are the Benz-Micro gear. The aces, ('specially Low output) and Gliders are absolutely sublime. And ofcourse the gullwing ![]() But I'm loathe to spend the kind of money you need to get into the good Benz stuff. I recommend the Ortofon Salsa. It's goofy looking but it sounds amazing for the money (Super Fine Line tip!)
__________________
Wherever you go there you are. |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Dallas
|
I have a Sure in my Technics. I don't even know what kind it is. Sounds fine to me.
But is the issue here is moving mass? Which is less? Moving Coil or Moving Magnet? Has anyone tried Moving Neodymium, or Moving Field Coil (IE: not the pickup coil thats doing the moving)? I'm assuming there is some minimum BL that has to be achieved. And then after that, additional moving mass (even if the signal gets bigger) is dead weight. Is this how it works, or am I completely off the page? |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Looking for a builder of a reference phono stage for MC carts. | ad010685 | Analog Line Level | 4 | 11th October 2006 12:17 PM |
| Grado carts. sensitive, yes, but too much? | DragonMaster | Everything Else | 2 | 31st January 2006 09:28 PM |
| Interesting idea to make MM carts sound better... | Mr.Radar | Analogue Source | 29 | 16th November 2005 11:14 AM |
| Gluing styli to MM carts -- ??? for Dice45 | Lonestar | Analogue Source | 14 | 29th April 2002 11:02 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |