|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Analogue Source Turntables, Tonearms, Cartridges, Phono Stages, Tuners, Tape Recorders, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#61 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
|
the button says something about "speed" and i realize on 45 mode the record spins faster than on 33 (aka higher RPM).
was this like SP/LP/EP on VCR's or something? higher speed = higher quality sound? |
|
|
|
|
#62 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...rd&btnG=Search
in short, they are 7" discs, mostly with a large hole in the middle (requiring a spindle adapter) and mostly ended up being used for singles. (yes there was something said about sound quality too...) you might say, just a chapter in another early format war ;-) |
|
|
|
|
#63 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Survey says: Least happiest city in Canada
|
Quote:
Generally, if a record is to be played at a speed not usual for its diameter, it will say on the label which speed it is to be played at. Further, some will play 45 on one side and 33 on the other. edit: d'oh, eclectic beat me to it.
__________________
"Part of the reason a poot into a toilet bowl sounds the way it does is because of phase shift." -Andrew Eckhardt |
|
|
|
|
|
#64 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Doerun, GA
|
Quote:
On a 45 single, you got the charting song on the "A" side, and (usually) something more obscure on the "B" side. In the mid 70's a 45 cost $0.57 at our local record store when an album was around $5. But you have to get up after EVERY song when playing singles. As you're discovering, analog can be very interactive. Isn't it amazing that a mechanical device can reproduce music so well through wiggling in various ways?
__________________
Tim |
|
|
|
|
|
#65 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Victoria, BC
|
Quote:
If it's just dust or dirt sitting there, cleaning the record with a duster will help. If it's dirt adhered to the grooves, more serious measures - such as washing the record - are called for. If it's a physical deformation, it can't be cleaned away. Quote:
Moral? Keep your records as clean as possible; recognize that this annoyance can be minimized *significantly* by a "good setup" at considerable expense; and in the meantime, live with it. Oh, and be civil to TerryO - he's a good guy and extremely knowledgeable. I'm allowed to diss him, but only because I'm an old fart too, _and_ he knows me well enough to ignore me. Regards. Aengus |
||
|
|
|
|
#66 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
Starting in the early 1980s a number of record producers released 12" disks recorded at 45rpm, this included a lot of early mix (dance music) disks played in clubs as well as releases by some audiophile labels. I have about 20 of these at last count.
45rpm recordings provide significant additional headroom over the more common 33rpm recordings - particularly useful for organ music and very dynamic classical music. Electronic music with a lot of highs and very deep bass also benefits. Why the dance disks were originally recorded at the higher speed I cannot say, but most of the ones I have are 45rpm, and feature anywhere up to 4 different mixes per side. Just a single song per side. I will say these are some of the best sounding recordings I have of this sort of music. Maximum play time is typically under 15 minutes. There were two other speeds - 16rpm which was typically used for talking books (children's stories, etc.) and 78rpm on shellac and later vinyl. There is a huge amount of music on 78s because it was the defacto standard from the mid acoustical era (ended 1928) to the early 1950s when it was supplanted by RCA's 33rpm microgroove LP (not stereo!). These disks are about 10" in diameter and have wildly varying equalization requirements, (speed was not completely standardized either and varied from 76 - 79rpm depending on label) play time was typically well under 10 minutes a side, and symphonic works and operas came in huge sets.. This is the format that made changers a virtual necessity.. Some people collect these and are quite adamant that some of the best sounding electronic recordings of all time were released on these disks. (Mono only of course.) I'm totally monophobic so I wouldn't go that far as stereo is an important element in my enjoyment of the music. Edison cylinder and the Emile Berliner disk (~78rpm) are contemporaneous, however the disk ultimately won the war just like BR won over HDDVD... Just took a whole lot longer.
__________________
www.kta-hifi.net |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Technics SL turntable question | jkeny | Analogue Source | 2 | 23rd September 2008 05:14 PM |
| question re: sony ps-f5 portable turntable | voicegyrl | The Lounge | 0 | 31st July 2008 09:36 PM |
| Question about a Technics turntable | nhuwar | Analogue Source | 3 | 30th July 2007 06:34 PM |
| Old Turntable question | dieselpower | Analogue Source | 15 | 22nd January 2005 03:50 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.12981 seconds (77.23% PHP - 22.77% MySQL) with 11 queries |